Effect of group racial composition on weight loss in African Americans.

Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 03/2008; 16(2):306-10. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.49
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We do not know how racial composition of a group influences behavior change for African Americans (AAs) in group-based weight loss programs. We tested the hypothesis that AA who participate in all AA weight loss intervention groups will lose more weight than AA who participate in mixed race groups.
This observational study was ancillary to Phase 1 of the Weight Loss Maintenance Study, a multi-center trial of strategies to maintain weight loss after a 20-week behavior modification program. Three of four centers recruited several all-AA intervention groups. Remaining groups were combinations of AA and non-AA participants. All participants received the same weight loss intervention. Change in weight was the primary outcome, comparing participants of all-AA groups with AA participants of mixed race groups conducted by the same AA interventionists. Secondary outcomes included measures of intervention adherence and behavior change.
Participants of all-AA groups (n = 271) were comparable to other AA participants (n = 106). The mean proportion of AA in mixed race groups was 56%. All-AA group participants had similar weight loss as those in mixed groups (-4.2 vs. -4.2 kg, P = 0.97). There were no differences between the groups in mean number of sessions attended or changes in dietary intake.
Significant weight loss was observed in both groups, with no effect of group composition on adherence or weight loss outcomes. Special logistics to accommodate all-AA groups may not be necessary. Despite varying instructional environments, AA appeared to respond positively to intervention messages with significant changes in dietary intake, physical activity (PA), and weight.

Download full-text


Available from: Carmen Samuel-Hodge, Oct 03, 2014
  • Source
    • "This often meant delivering the intervention in existing ethnically appropriate locations (Lasco et al. 1989) or adapting locations to be appropriate , for example, to respect the group's gender values (e.g., by employing for some South Asian populations only female lifeguards for women-only swimming sessions) (Kousar, Burns, and Lewandowski 2008). The delivery also considered appropriate activities; the population's preferred methods of communication and learning (Andrews et al. 2007; Utz et al. 2008); the preferred format of individual or group sessions (Boltri et al. 2008) to encourage social support (Yanek et al. 2001); and the preference of an exclusive (single ethnic group) or open (mixed ethnic groups) intervention environment (Ard et al. 2008). This forty-six-item Typology of Adaptation Approaches is presented in more detail, and with definitions, in table 2. The adaptations identified in the 107 studies are summarized in appendix 3. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adapting behavior change interventions to meet the needs of racial and ethnic minority populations has the potential to enhance their effectiveness in the target populations. But because there is little guidance on how best to undertake these adaptations, work in this field has proceeded without any firm foundations. In this article, we present our Tool Kit of Adaptation Approaches as a framework for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers interested in delivering behavior change interventions to ethnically diverse, underserved populations in the United Kingdom. We undertook a mixed-method program of research on interventions for smoking cessation, increasing physical activity, and promoting healthy eating that had been adapted to improve salience and acceptability for African-, Chinese-, and South Asian-origin minority populations. This program included a systematic review (reported using PRISMA criteria), qualitative interviews, and a realist synthesis of data. We compiled a richly informative data set of 161 publications and twenty-six interviews detailing the adaptation of behavior change interventions and the contexts in which they were undertaken. On the basis of these data, we developed our Tool Kit of Adaptation Approaches, which contains (1) a forty-six-item Typology of Adaptation Approaches; (2) a Pathway to Adaptation, which shows how to use the Typology to create a generic behavior change intervention; and (3) RESET, a decision tool that provides practical guidance on which adaptations to use in different contexts. Our Tool Kit of Adaptation Approaches provides the first evidence-derived suite of materials to support the development, design, implementation, and reporting of health behavior change interventions for minority groups. The Tool Kit now needs prospective, empirical evaluation in a range of intervention and population settings.
    Milbank Quarterly 12/2013; 91(4):811-51. DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12034 · 5.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the overall obesity epidemic, the burden of obesity and related health problems is particularly high among African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and Pacific Islanders—both children and adults. The often asked question of what types of obesity interventions work in these populations reflects uncertainty about how applicable standard interventions are to diverse socio-cultural groups and socio-environmental contexts. A meta-analysis in this issue of Preventive Medicine (Seo and Sa, 2008. A meta-analysis of psycho-behavioral obesity interventions among US multiethnic and minority adults) includes selected multi-ethnic and minority-focused studies that in total had 40% minority participants. Although the authors' conclusions were congruent with current general guidance for weight loss programs, insights about how to intervene with minority populations were limited by the small amount and nature of the available evidence. Ethnic minorities in the aggregate are now a third of the U.S. population. We should be purposeful in identifying research needs and quality standards for conducting and reporting studies with these populations and in motivating related research. Improving the relevance to and quality of evidence on obesity prevention and treatment for a more diverse set of populations will also improve the weight control literature as a whole.
    Preventive Medicine 12/2008; 47(6-47):583-586. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.09.012 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more