Article

The effects of cigarette costs on BMI and obesity.

Economics Graduate Program, Economics and Finance Department, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, USA.
Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.14). 03/2008; 18(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1340
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT About 30% of Americans are currently obese, which is roughly a 100% increase from 25 years ago. Public health officials have consequently become alarmed because recent research indicates that societal costs of obesity now exceed those of cigarette smoking and alcoholism. Cigarette taxes may have exacerbated the prevalence of obesity. In 1964, the US Surgeon General issued its first report relating smoking and health, and since that time, federal and state governments have increased cigarette taxes in a successful effort to reduce cigarette smoking. However, because cigarette smoking and obesity seem inversely related, cigarette taxes may have simultaneously increased obesity. This paper examines the effects of cigarette costs on BMI and obesity and finds that they have significant positive effects. This paper attempts to reconcile conflicting evidence in the literature by controlling more carefully for correlation with state-specific time trends using panel data. Results indicate that the net benefit to society of increasing cigarette taxes may not be as large as previously thought, though this research in no way concludes that they should be decreased to prompt weight loss.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Occasional smokers are an increasingly important segment of the smoking population. We explore the effects of occasional smoking on body mass index (BMI) in comparison to non-smoking and daily smoking in adults age 18-50. Data are compiled from the 2005-2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Occasional smoking is found to have a negative and substantial, albeit smaller than that of daily smoking, effect on body weight. Differences in the effect of occasional smoking on body weight across BMI categories are small. Unlike daily smoking, the effects of occasional smoking on BMI are larger for females.
    Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 09/2014; 36(3):479-503. DOI:10.1093/aepp/ppu008 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This work examines the role of fast-food consumption on body weight in the United Kingdom, by means of two recent waves from the British Household Panel Survey. We use quantile regression to examine whether increases in consumption of this unhealthy food category affect differently individuals located at selected quantiles of the body mass index distribution. Our results support some findings in the literature, but also point to new conclusions. Quantile regression estimates suggest that fast-food consumption affects individuals with higher body mass index more heavily, especially women. Irrespective of gender, we also find a negative and significant correlation between the price of take-away meals and snacks and weight. Some policy implications are discussed on the basis of our main results.
    Food Policy 03/2014; 46(I):94-105. DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.004 · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper explores the association between Body Mass Index and a set of variables concerning consumer interest toward nutritional information, quality and marketing characteristics of food products. Socio-demographic and life-style aspects are also examined to profile excess weight consumers. The survey was conducted in a region of northern Italy, and the sample analysed is composed of 908 consumers. An Ordinal Regression Model was used in which the dependent variable is discrete and ordered and is expressed in terms of BMI ordinal categories. The analysis revealed that people with excess weight display a high level of interest in nutrition claims, namely, short and immediately recognised messages. Conversely, obese individuals assign less importance to marketing attributes (price, brand, and flavour) compared with normal weight consumers. Socio-demographic and life-style characteristics affect the rate of obesity, highlighting that the most vulnerable segments of population are more susceptible to excess weight problems.
    Food Policy 12/2014; 49:241–249. DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.09.001 · 2.33 Impact Factor