The effects of cigarette cost on BMI and obesity

Economics Graduate Program, Economics and Finance Department, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, USA.
Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.23). 01/2009; 18(1):3-19. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1340
Source: PubMed


About 30% of Americans are currently obese, which is roughly a 100% increase from 25 years ago. Public health officials have consequently become alarmed because recent research indicates that societal costs of obesity now exceed those of cigarette smoking and alcoholism. Cigarette taxes may have exacerbated the prevalence of obesity. In 1964, the US Surgeon General issued its first report relating smoking and health, and since that time, federal and state governments have increased cigarette taxes in a successful effort to reduce cigarette smoking. However, because cigarette smoking and obesity seem inversely related, cigarette taxes may have simultaneously increased obesity. This paper examines the effects of cigarette costs on BMI and obesity and finds that they have significant positive effects. This paper attempts to reconcile conflicting evidence in the literature by controlling more carefully for correlation with state-specific time trends using panel data. Results indicate that the net benefit to society of increasing cigarette taxes may not be as large as previously thought, though this research in no way concludes that they should be decreased to prompt weight loss.

15 Reads
  • Source
    • "It is worth noting that the use A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t of longitudinal data is not frequent in this literature. As exceptions, [4] and [9] used the National "

    Economics & Human Biology 11/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2015.11.002 · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "With these premises, estimation of the causal effect of smoking on BMI was hindered by the presence of indigeneity, due to unobservable characteristics or reverse causality. To solve this problem, part of the literature uses a DID strategy with panel data (see, e.g., Baum [6] and French et al. [21]), which accounts for individual unobservable time-invariant characteristics affecting cigarette consumption and weight differently for treatment and control groups. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This article estimated the causal effect of quitting smoking on body weight gains in the United Kingdom to evaluate whether savings in health costs deriving from smoking prevention and its related diseases are greater than the costs associated with increased obesity. Methods: We used a longitudinal data set extracted from two waves (2004-2006) of the British Household Panel Survey, which includes information on smoking and a large number of sociodemographic variables. We modeled the effect of quitting smoking on body weight accounting for heterogeneous responses from individuals belonging to different clinical classes of body mass index (BMI) (i.e., overweight and obese individuals). National Health Service costs associated with smoking were then used to implement a cost-benefit analysis, comparing the advantages of smoking reductions with the costs associated with increased obesity. Results: The BMI was found to increase by 0.26 points for quitters compared with those who continued to smoke. The estimated BMI increase was larger for overweight (0.49 points) and obese (0.76 points) people. This result does not change when different control groups are examined. From an economic perspective, the National Health Service cost reductions attributable to quitting smoking were £156.81 million whereas the lost benefit for unintended increases in body weight was £24.07 million. Conclusions: This article found that the health benefits associated with quitting smoking are greater than the costs associated with increased overweight and obesity.
    Value in Health 09/2015; 18(6):791-799. DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2015.06.008 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Philipson, 2001). Therefore, understanding the determinants of obesity is subject to increasing research in empirical literature (Baum, 2009). While ample studies link globalization, socio-economic development, and sedentary lifestyles to obesity (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The antecedents of the 'weights of nations' have been in the center of theoretical and empirical discussion over the past decades. In this research, we contribute to extant studies by investigating the effect of general intelligence, measured by nation IQ, on the Body Mass Indices (BMI) of male and female populations for 187 countries of the world. Our results suggest an inverted U-shaped link between intelligence and BMI. The results remain robust to a number of robustness checks such as controlling for urbanization, globalization and trade.
    Personality and Individual Differences 08/2015; 87:105-109. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.033 · 1.95 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications