Prevalence of Mental Illness in Immigrant and Non-Immigrant U.S. Latino Groups

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 04/2008; 165(3):359-69. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07040704
Source: PubMed


Although widely reported among Latino populations, contradictory evidence exists regarding the generalizability of the immigrant paradox, i.e., that foreign nativity protects against psychiatric disorders. The authors examined whether this paradox applies to all Latino groups by comparing estimates of lifetime psychiatric disorders among immigrant Latino subjects, U.S-born Latino subjects, and non-Latino white subjects.
The authors combined and examined data from the National Latino and Asian American Study and the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, two of the largest nationally representative samples of psychiatric information.
In the aggregate, risk of most psychiatric disorders was lower for Latino subjects than for non-Latino white subjects. Consistent with the immigrant paradox, U.S.-born Latino subjects reported higher rates for most psychiatric disorders than Latino immigrants. However, rates varied when data were stratified by nativity and disorder and adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic differences across groups. The immigrant paradox consistently held for Mexican subjects across mood, anxiety, and substance disorders, while it was only evident among Cuban and other Latino subjects for substance disorders. No differences were found in lifetime prevalence rates between migrant and U.S.-born Puerto Rican subjects.
Caution should be exercised in generalizing the immigrant paradox to all Latino groups and for all psychiatric disorders. Aggregating Latino subjects into a single group masks significant variability in lifetime risk of psychiatric disorders, with some subgroups, such as Puerto Rican subjects, suffering from psychiatric disorders at rates comparable to non-Latino white subjects. Our findings thus suggest that immigrants benefit from a protective context in their country of origin, possibly inoculating them against risk for substance disorders, particularly if they emigrated to the United States as adults.

Download full-text


Available from: Glorisa Canino,
  • Source
    • "Int J Ment Health Addiction among immigrants. Previous findings are mixed as to whether immigrants are in the risk group for mental health problems in general (e.g., Bhugra and Jones 2001; Algeria et al. 2008). However, previous research has found that there is a higher prevalence of problematic video gaming in East Asian populations, as compared to Western European, North American and Australian populations (King et al. 2012), which might lend support to the idea that immigrants from this region might be more susceptible to develop video game addiction, because of their general interest for gaming, and not because of immigration. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Video gaming has become a popular leisure activity in many parts of the world, and an increasing number of empirical studies examine the small minority that appears to develop problems as a result of excessive gaming. This study investigated prevalence rates and predictors of video game addiction in a sample of gamers, randomly selected from the National Population Registry of Norway (N=3389). Results showed there were 1.4 % addicted gamers, 7.3 % problem gamers, 3.9 % engaged gamers, and 87.4 % normal gamers. Gender (being male) and age group (being young) were positively associated with addicted-, problem-, and engaged gamers. Place of birth (Africa, Asia, South-and Middle America) were positively associated with addicted-and problem gamers. Video game addiction was negatively associated with conscientiousness and positively associated with neuroticism. Poor psychosomatic health was positively associated with problem-and engaged gaming. These factors provide insight into the field of video game addiction, and may help to provide guidance as to how individuals that are at risk of becoming addicted gamers can be identified.
    International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 09/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11469-015-9592-8 · 0.99 Impact Factor
    • "tudies typically find that foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos have lower morbidity and mortality than U.S.-born Hispanics/Latinos (Abraído-Lanza et al., 1999). Recent studies focused on mental health also find lower rates of psychological disorders among foreign-born Hispanics/Latinos compared to U.S.-born Hispanics/Latinos (Alegria et al., 2008; Cook et al., 2009; Vega et al., 2004). These lower rates of mental health problems among the foreign-born puzzle public health researchers given that Hispanic/Latino immigrants typically have low socioeconomic backgrounds and are exposed to stressful conditions during and after their migration to the U.S., two factors associated with poorer mental health (Cook et al., 2009; Vega et al., 2004; Ornelas and Perreira, 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the association between exposure to the U.S. and symptoms of poor mental health among adult Hispanic/Latinos (N = 15,004) overall and by Hispanic/Latino background. Using data from the Hispanic Community Health Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), we estimated logistic regressions to model the risk of moderate to severe symptoms of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety as a function of years in the U.S. and six key psychosocial risk and protective factors. In unadjusted models, increased time in the U.S. was associated with higher risk of poor mental health. After adjustment for just three key factors-perceived discrimination, perceived U.S. social standing, and the size of close social networks-differences in the odds of poor mental health by years in the U.S became insignificant for Hispanics/Latinos overall. However, analyses by Hispanic/Latino background revealed different patterns of association with exposure to the U.S. that could not be fully explained.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease 07/2015; 203(9). DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000350 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Over half (53.1%) of the foreign-born US population originates from Latin America and the Caribbean , and as such represents a substantial subgroup. Hispanics in the US, regardless of migration status, have been identified as a highrisk group for depression along with other mental health ailments [11]. It is speculated that the stressful experiences immigrants encounter , including linguistic, financial, acculturative, legal, and discriminatory challenges, contribute to poorer mental health [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to examine levels of depression and quality of life in Spanish-speaking (less acculturated) immigrants with epilepsy compared with those in English-speaking US-born persons with epilepsy (PWEs). The study included 85 PWEs - 38 Spanish-speaking immigrants with epilepsy and 47 US-born PWEs. All patients underwent video-EEG monitoring and completed depression and quality-of-life inventories in their dominant language (Spanish/English). Chart review of clinical epilepsy variables was conducted by an epileptologist. Our study revealed that depression scores were significantly higher in Hispanic PWEs (21.65±14.6) than in US-born PWEs (14.50±10.2) (t (64.02)=-2.3, two-sided p=.025). Marital status, medical insurance, antidepressant use, seizure frequency, and number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were tested as covariates in the ANCOVA framework and were not statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level. Fewer Hispanics were prescribed antidepressant medications (13.15% for Hispanics and 40.42% for US-born, χ(2) (1,85) 7.71, p=.005) and had access to comprehensive health insurance coverage (χ(2) (1,85)=13.70, p=0.000). Hispanic patients were also found to be receiving significantly less AEDs compared with their US-born peers (t (83, 85)=2.33, p=.02). Although quality of life was diminished in both groups, Seizure Worry was worse for Hispanics after accounting for potential effects of marital status, medical insurance, use of antidepressants, seizure frequency, and number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) ((1, 83), F=7.607, p=0.007). The present study is the first of its kind to examine depression and quality of life in Spanish-speaking US immigrants with epilepsy. Spanish-speaking immigrants with epilepsy have been identified as a group at risk. They demonstrated higher depression scores and more Seizure Worry independent of epilepsy and demographic characteristics compared with their US-born peers. The Hispanic group was receiving less treatment for depression, was taking less AEDs, and had less access to comprehensive health coverage compared with non-Hispanics. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 07/2015; 51(2015):146-151. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.07.024 · 2.26 Impact Factor
Show more