Influence of antibiotic therapy on the cytological diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia

Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Intensive Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 7.21). 06/2008; 34(5):865-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1015-x
Source: PubMed


To assess the influence of antibiotics on the value of various cytological parameters, and their combinations, in diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Prospective study.
The general intensive care unit (17 beds) of the University Hospital Maastricht.
Three hundred and thirty-five episodes of clinically suspected VAP (defined by the clinical and radiological criteria previously described by Bonten et al.) in 282 patients were studied.
No additional interventions were conducted.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology included a total cell count per millilitre, differential cell count and the percentage of infected cells (cells containing phagocytised organisms). Antibiotic therapy from 72 h prior to lavage was recorded. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for various cytological parameters and their combinations, in patients with and without antibiotic therapy. In 126 episodes (37.6%) in 106 patients, VAP was confirmed. There was no difference in AUCs between patients with and without antibiotic therapy for any parameter studied. The most prominent AUCs were (for patient groups with and without antibiotics combined): total cell count, 0.65; percentage polymorphonuclear neutrophils, 0.71; and percentage infected cells, 0.90. The combination of percentage infected cells with any other cytological parameter did not increase the AUC.
Antibiotic therapy did not influence the predictive value of the percentage infected cells in BALF in diagnosing VAP.

Download full-text


Available from: M. Drent, Oct 07, 2015
13 Reads
  • Source
    • "Bronchoscopy with subsequent lavage was performed as described previously [Linssen et al., 2008]. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were transported to the laboratory within 15 min after collection and processed immediately upon arrival at the microbiology laboratory. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (APMV) belongs to the amoebae-associated microorganisms. Antibodies to APMV have been found in patients with pneumonia suggesting a potential role as a respiratory pathogen. In addition, positive serology for APMV was associated with an increased duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. The aim of the present study was to assess the presence of APMV in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples of critically ill patients suspected of ventilator-associated pneumonia. The study was conducted in the intensive care unit of the Maastricht University Medical Centre. All consecutive bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples obtained between January 2005 and October 2009 from patients suspected of ventilator-associated pneumonia were eligible for inclusion. All samples were analyzed by real-time PCR targeting the APMV. A total of 260 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from 214 patients (139 male, 75 female) were included. Bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia was confirmed microbiologically in 105 out of 260 (40%) suspected episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (86 patients). The presence of APMV DNA could not be demonstrated in the bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia positive or in the bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia negative bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Although suspected, APMV appeared not to be present in critically ill patients suspected of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and APMV does not seem to be a frequent cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J. Med. Virol. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Medical Virology 10/2013; 85(10). DOI:10.1002/jmv.23655 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, the percentage of ICOs is not influenced by antibiotic therapy in the 72 hours prior to the BAL. This makes it an important parameter for distinguishing VAP from non-VAP conditions [15]. However, BAL fluid workup and its microscopic analysis are time-consuming and must be done by experienced technicians. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clara cell protein 10 (CC-10) has been associated with inflammatory and infectious pulmonary diseases. This study evaluates CC-10 concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid as a potential marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Between January 2003 and December 2007, BAL fluid samples obtained from critically ill patients at the intensive care unit of the Maastricht University Medical Centre clinically suspected of having VAP were included. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) microbiologically confirmed VAP (the VAP group) and (2) microbiologically unconfirmed VAP (the non-VAP group). The concentration of CC-10 was measured by means of a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, and retrospective analysis was performed. Areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for CC-10 concentrations. A total of 196 patients (122 men, 74 women) were included. A total of 79 (40%) of 196 cases of suspected VAP were microbiologically confirmed. The median CC-10 concentration in the VAP group was 3,019 ng/mL (range, 282 to 65,546 ng/mL) versus 2,504 ng/mL (range, 62 to 30,240 ng/mL) in the non-VAP group (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in CC-10 concentrations between patients treated with or without corticosteroids (P = 0.26) or antibiotic therapy (P = 0.9). The CC-10 concentration did not differ significantly between patients with Gram-positive versus Gram-negative bacteria that caused the VAP (P = 0.06). However, CC-10 concentrations did differ significantly between the late-onset VAP group and the non-VAP group. The CC-10 concentration in BAL fluid yielded low diagnostic accuracy in confirming the presence of VAP.
    Critical care (London, England) 01/2011; 15(1):R14. DOI:10.1186/cc9418 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Infections were retrospectively determined using the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria [16] and modified CDC criteria [17] in case of clinical suspicion of a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were only assigned when other infections could be ruled out. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been shown to decrease the infection rate and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs); Lactobacillus plantarum 299/299v plus fibre (LAB) has been used for infection prevention and does not harbour the potential disadvantages of antibiotics. The objective was to assess whether LAB is not inferior to SDD in infection prevention. Two hundred fifty-four consecutive ICU patients with expected mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h and/or expected ICU stay ≥ 72 h were assigned to receive SDD: four times daily an oral paste (polymyxin E, gentamicin, amphotericin B), enteral solution (same antibiotics), intravenous cefotaxime (first 4 days) or LAB: two times daily L. plantarum 299/299v with rose-hip. The primary endpoint was infection rate. A difference <12% between both groups indicated non-inferiority of LAB. The trial was prematurely stopped after a study reporting increased mortality in critically ill pancreatitis patients receiving probiotics. No significant difference in infection rate [31% in the LAB group, 24% in the SDD group (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.91-3.08; p = 0.10)] was found. ICU mortality was 26% and not significantly different between the LAB and SDD groups. Gram-positive cocci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were significantly more frequently isolated from surveillance cultures in the SDD group compared to the LAB group (for sputum: 18 vs. 10% and 33 vs. 14%). Significantly more Enterobacteriaceae were found in the LAB group (23 vs. 50%). No increase in antibiotic resistance was found during and after SDD or LAB use. The trial could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of LAB compared with SDD in infection prevention. Results suggest no increased ICU mortality risk in the LAB group.
    Intensive Care Medicine 01/2011; 37(1):110-7. DOI:10.1007/s00134-010-2002-6 · 7.21 Impact Factor
Show more