Article

Influence of antibiotic therapy on the cytological diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Intensive Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.54). 06/2008; 34(5):865-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1015-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the influence of antibiotics on the value of various cytological parameters, and their combinations, in diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Prospective study.
The general intensive care unit (17 beds) of the University Hospital Maastricht.
Three hundred and thirty-five episodes of clinically suspected VAP (defined by the clinical and radiological criteria previously described by Bonten et al.) in 282 patients were studied.
No additional interventions were conducted.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology included a total cell count per millilitre, differential cell count and the percentage of infected cells (cells containing phagocytised organisms). Antibiotic therapy from 72 h prior to lavage was recorded. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for various cytological parameters and their combinations, in patients with and without antibiotic therapy. In 126 episodes (37.6%) in 106 patients, VAP was confirmed. There was no difference in AUCs between patients with and without antibiotic therapy for any parameter studied. The most prominent AUCs were (for patient groups with and without antibiotics combined): total cell count, 0.65; percentage polymorphonuclear neutrophils, 0.71; and percentage infected cells, 0.90. The combination of percentage infected cells with any other cytological parameter did not increase the AUC.
Antibiotic therapy did not influence the predictive value of the percentage infected cells in BALF in diagnosing VAP.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
98 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infection is a common complication seen in ICU patients. Given the correlation between infection and mortality in these patients, a rapid etiological diagnosis and the determination of antimicrobial resistance markers are of paramount importance, especially in view of today's globally spread of multi drug resistance microorganisms. This paper reviews some of the rapid diagnostic techniques available for ICU patients with infections. A narrative review of recent peer-reviewed literature (published between 1995 and 2014) was performed using as the search terms: Intensive care medicine, Microbiological techniques, Clinical laboratory techniques, Diagnosis, and Rapid diagnosis, with no language restrictions. The most developed microbiology fields for a rapid diagnosis of infection in critically ill patients are those related to the diagnosis of bloodstream infection, pneumonia -both ventilator associated and non-ventilator associated-, urinary tract infection, skin and soft tissue infections, viral infections and tuberculosis. New developments in the field of microbiology have served to shorten turnaround times and optimize the treatment of many types of infection. Although there are still some unresolved limitations of the use of molecular techniques for a rapid diagnosis of infection in the ICU patient, this approach holds much promise for the future.
    BMC Infectious Diseases 01/2014; 14(1):593. DOI:10.1186/s12879-014-0593-1 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The clinical picture of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) can be mimicked by other infectious and non-infectious diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the alternative diagnoses and to develop a diagnostic flow chart for patients suspected of having VAP not meeting the diagnostic broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) criteria. Methods: Adult intensive care patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP and negative BAL results were included. The clinical suspicion of VAP was based on the combination of clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. BAL was considered positive if cell differentiation revealed ≥ 2% cells with intracellular organisms and/or quantitative culture results of ≥ 10(4) cfu/ml. The most likely alternative diagnosis of fever and pulmonary densities was retrospectively determined by two authors independently. Results: In all, 110 of 207 patients with suspected VAP did not meet the diagnostic BAL criteria and required further diagnostic evaluation. In 67 patients an alternative diagnosis for fever could be found. In 51 patients an alternative diagnosis of both fever and pulmonary densities could be established. In almost 40% of patients no alternative diagnosis could be provided. Non-bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed in 10 patients with Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) as the most common pathogen. In eight patients non-infectious pneumonitis was diagnosed. Conclusion: Due to the wide range of alternative diagnoses and applied tests the diagnostic work-up proved to be necessarily individualized and guided by repeated clinical assessment. The most frequently found alternative diagnoses were viral pneumonia and non-infectious pneumonitis.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Authoritative guidelines state that the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) can be established using either endotracheal aspirate (ETA) or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis, thereby suggesting that their results are considered to be in accordance. Therefore, results of ETA Gram stain and semi-quantitative cultures were compared to results of paired BALF analysis. Different thresholds for positivity of ETAs were assessed.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
76 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014