Article

The circadian clock protein BMAL1 is necessary for fertility and proper testosterone production in mice.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Journal of Biological Rhythms (Impact Factor: 3.32). 03/2008; 23(1):26-36. DOI: 10.1177/0748730407311254
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although it is well established that the circadian clock regulates mammalian reproductive physiology, the molecular mechanisms by which this regulation occurs are not clear. The authors investigated the reproductive capacity of mice lacking Bmal1 (Arntl, Mop3), one of the central circadian clock genes. They found that both male and female Bmal1 knockout (KO) mice are infertile. Gross and microscopic inspection of the reproductive anatomy of both sexes suggested deficiencies in steroidogenesis. Male Bmal1 KO mice had low testosterone and high luteinizing hormone serum concentrations, suggesting a defect in testicular Leydig cells. Importantly, Leydig cells rhythmically express BMAL1 protein, suggesting peripheral control of testosterone production by this clock protein. Expression of steroidogenic genes was reduced in testes and other steroidogenic tissues of Bmal1 KO mice. In particular, expression of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene and protein, which regulates the rate-limiting step of steroidogenesis, was decreased in testes from Bmal1 KO mice. A direct effect of BMAL1 on StAR expression in Leydig cells was indicated by in vitro experiments showing enhancement of StAR transcription by BMAL1. Other hormonal defects in male Bmal1 KO mice suggest that BMAL1 also has functions in reproductive physiology outside of the testis. These results enhance understanding of how the circadian clock regulates reproduction.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Teri S Ord, Jul 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
191 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rhythmic oscillations that repeat every 24h can be found in numerous behavioral and physiological functions. Beside the endogenous master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), peripheral oscillators exist that can disengage from the master clock rhythm by different mechanisms. The fact that core clock genes in peripheral tissues do not always have the same characteristics as in the SCN suggests that their function may vary in different organs. Additionally, suggestions about species-specific variation in expression peak and nadir times, especially in the testis, led to the need for systematical investigations on clock gene expression patterns in different organs and species under standardized methodological conditions. Therefore, daily gene expression patterns of the clock genes Bmal1, Period1, Period2, Clock, Cryptochrome1 and Cryptochrome2 were recorded at each of eight time points during a 24hour period in the testis, kidney, liver, spleen and heart of three hamster species (Phodopus sungorus, Phodopus roborovskii and Cricetulus griseus; family: Cricetidae). Clock gene expression was found to be rhythmic in all investigated organs, however with inconsistent results in the testis. Complex cosinor analysis revealed species differences in temporal gene expression patterns regarding their orthophase, number of peaks, and amplitude for all genes and organs with most pronounced differences in the testis. The results of this study strongly indicate that clock gene expression is species-specific and that their function in peripheral tissues might be at least partly connected to clock-unrelated traits that vary between the investigated species. Further studies should aim at clarifying the specific roles of clock genes in the testis.
    Gene 07/2014; 548(1). DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.019 · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is a long-standing view that the circadian clock functions to proactively align internal physiology with the 24-h rotation of the earth. Recent studies, including one by Schmutz and colleagues (pp. 345-357) in the February 15, 2010, issue of Genes & Development, delineate strikingly complex connections between molecular clocks and nuclear receptor signaling pathways, implying the existence of a large-scale circadian regulatory network coordinating a diverse array of physiological processes to maintain dynamic homeostasis.
    Genes & development 04/2010; 24(8):741-7. DOI:10.1101/gad.1920710 · 12.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Circadian clocks guide the metabolic, cell-division, sleep-wake, circadian and seasonal cycles. Abnormalities in these clocks may be a health hazard. Circadian clock gene polymorphisms have been linked to sleep, mood and metabolic disorders. Our study aimed to examine polymorphisms in four key circadian clock genes in relation to seasonal variation, reproduction and well-being in a sample that was representative of the general population, aged 30 and over, living in Finland. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the ARNTL, ARNTL2, CLOCK and NPAS2 genes were genotyped in 511 individuals. 19 variants were analyzed in relation to 31 phenotypes that were assessed in a health interview and examination study. With respect to reproduction, women with ARNTL rs2278749 TT genotype had more miscarriages and pregnancies, while NPAS2 rs11673746 T carriers had fewer miscarriages. NPAS2 rs2305160 A allele carriers had lower Global Seasonality Scores, a sum score of six items i.e. seasonal variation of sleep length, social activity, mood, weight, appetite and energy level. Furthermore, carriers of A allele at NPAS2 rs6725296 had greater loadings on the metabolic factor (weight and appetite) of the global seasonality score, whereas individuals with ARNTL rs6290035 TT genotype experienced less seasonal variation of energy level. ARNTL and NPAS2 gene variants were associated with reproduction and with seasonal variation. Earlier findings have linked ARNTL to infertility in mice, but this is the first time when any polymorphism of these genes is linked to fertility in humans.
    PLoS ONE 04/2010; 5(4):e10007. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0010007 · 3.53 Impact Factor