Article

An increased risk of stroke among young schizophrenia patients

School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 4.43). 04/2008; 101(1-3):234-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.12.485
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study sets out to estimate the risk of stroke developing among young schizophrenia patients during a five-year follow-up period after hospitalization for episodes of acute exacerbation.
Hospitalized schizophrenia patients under 45 years of age were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for the year 1998 (n=5001). Two age-matched cases were randomly selected for each schizophrenia patient from among patients who underwent appendectomies in the same year (n=10,002). Each individual patient was retrospectively followed up from 1998 until the end of 2003 to determine whether any had developed strokes. Cox proportional hazard regressions were carried out to compute the adjusted five-year survival rate.
A total of 219 patients (1.46%) developed strokes during the five-year follow-up period, with the attacks occurring among 2.46% of schizophrenia patients and 0.94% of the comparison cohort. Following adjustment for patients' demographic characteristics, select comorbid medical disorders and substance abuse, schizophrenia patients were found to be 2.02 times (p<0.001) more likely to develop strokes during the follow-up period than age-matched appendectomy patients. The adjusted hazard ratios of developing stroke for male and female schizophrenia patients were, respectively, 1.64 (p<0.001) and 2.87 (p<0.001) times greater than their counterparts in the comparison group.
As compared with the comparison group, young schizophrenia patients demonstrated a two-fold increased risk of developing stroke during the five-year period after hospitalization. The risk of developing stroke among schizophrenia patients was found to be much higher for females than males.

Full-text

Available from: Fei-Hsiu Hsiao, Apr 19, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
127 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate whether patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have an increased risk of stroke or poststroke mortality. Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 30,165 patients with new TBI and 120,660 persons without TBI between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004. The risk of stroke was compared between 2 cohorts through December 31, 2008. To investigate the association between in-hospital mortality after stroke and history of TBI, we conducted a case-control study of 7751 patients with newly diagnosed stroke between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2008. The TBI cohort had an increased stroke risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.86-2.11). Among patients with stroke, those with a history of TBI had a higher risk of poststroke mortality compared with those without TBI (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.13-2.19). In the TBI cohort, factors associated with stroke were history of TBI hospitalization (HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.77-3.56), emergency care for TBI (HR, 3.37; 95% CI, 2.88-3.95), brain hemorrhage (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.43-2.99), skull fracture (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.42-3.71), low income (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.16-3.25), and high medical expenditure for TBI care (HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 2.09-2.43). The severity of TBI was also correlated with poststroke mortality. Traumatic brain injury was associated with risk of stroke and poststroke mortality. The relationship between TBI and poststroke mortality does not seem to transcend all age groups. This research shows the importance of prevention, early recognition, and treatment of stroke in this vulnerable population.
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 02/2014; 89(2):163-72. DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.019 · 5.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies on unmet needs during the last decades have played a significant role in the development and dissemination of evidence-based community practices for persistent schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders. This review has thoroughly considered several blocks of unmet needs, which are frequently related to schizophrenic disorders. Those related to health have been the first block to be considered, in which authors have examined the frequent complications and comorbidities found in schizophrenia, such as substance abuse and dual diagnosis. A second block has been devoted to psychosocial and economic needs, especially within the field of recovery of the persistently mentally ill. Within this block, the effects of the current economic difficulties shown in recent literature have been considered as well. Because no patient is static, a third block has reviewed evolving needs according to the clinical staging model. The fourth block has been dedicated to integrated evidence-based interventions to improve the quality of life of persons with schizophrenia. Consideration of community care for those reluctant to maintain contact with mental health services has constituted the fifth block. Finally, authors have aggregated their own reflections regarding future trends. The number of psychosocial unmet needs is extensive. Vast research efforts will be needed to find appropriate ways to meet them, particularly regarding so-called existential needs, but many needs could be met only by applying existing evidence-based interventions. Reinforcing research on the implementation strategies and capacity building of professionals working in community settings might address this problem. The final aim should be based on the collaborative model of care, which rests on the performance of a case manager responsible for monitoring patient progress, providing assertive follow-up, teaching self-help strategies, and facilitating communication among the patient, family doctor, mental health specialist, and other specialists.
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 01/2014; 10:97-110. DOI:10.2147/NDT.S41063 · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • International journal of cardiology 03/2014; 173(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.101 · 6.18 Impact Factor