Errors in EEG Interpretation and Misdiagnosis of Epilepsy

Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
European Neurology (Impact Factor: 1.36). 02/2008; 59(5):267-71. DOI: 10.1159/000115641
Source: PubMed


The overinterpretation of EEGs is common and is an important contributor to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. We reviewed our experience in order to clarify which EEG patterns are commonly overread as epileptiform.
We identified patients who were seen at our epilepsy clinic and were ultimately diagnosed as having conditions other than epilepsy. We selected those who had previously had an EEG read as showing epileptiform discharges and whose EEG was available for our own re-review.
37 patients met the above criteria. Eventual diagnoses were psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (10), syncope (7), other miscellaneous diagnoses (5) and unexplained nonspecific symptoms (15). None of the EEGs had epileptiform discharges. The descriptions of the abnormalities included 'temporal sharp waves' in 30, 'frontal sharp waves' in 2 and 'generalized spike-wave complexes' in 2. Three had no reports available to identify the alleged abnormality. The benign patterns mistaken for temporal (30) and frontal (2) sharp waves were simple fluctuations of background activity with temporal phase reversals.
By far the most common patterns overread as epileptiform are nonspecific fluctuations of background in the temporal regions, which are misread as temporal sharp waves.

Download full-text


Available from: Selim R Benbadis,
  • Source
    • "" Interictal epileptiform discharges " consist of spikes, polyspikes, and sharp waves on EEG, ECoG, or magnetoencephalography (MEG). Sharp transients or sharply-contoured waves explainable as physiological activities are not considered as interictal epileptiform discharges [4] [5]. " Ictal discharges " are defined here as sustained, rhythmic electrographic discharges accompanied by subsequent clinical habitual seizure symptoms; not simply explained by state changes and clearly distinguished from background and interictal electrographic activity [3] [6] [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Focality in electro-clinical or neuroimaging data often motivates epileptologists to consider epilepsy surgery in patients with medically-uncontrolled seizures, while not all focal findings are causally associated with the generation of epileptic seizures. With the help of Hill's criteria, we have discussed how to establish causality in the context of the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. The strengths of EEG include the ability to determine the temporal relationship between cerebral activities and clinical events; thus, scalp video-EEG is necessary in the evaluation of the majority of surgical candidates. The presence of associated ictal discharges can confirm the epileptic nature of a particular spell and whether an observed neuroimaging abnormality is causally associated with the epileptic seizure. Conversely, one should be aware that scalp EEG has a limited spatial resolution and sometimes exhibits propagated epileptiform discharges more predominantly than in situ discharges generated at the seizure-onset zone. Intraoperative or extraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) is utilized when noninvasive presurgical evaluation, including anatomical and functional neuroimaging, fails to determine the margin between the presumed epileptogenic zone and eloquent cortex. Retrospective as well as prospective studies have reported that complete resection of the seizure-onset zone on ECoG was associated with a better seizure outcome, but not all patients became seizure-free following such resective surgery. Some retrospective studies suggested that resection of sites showing high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) at >80Hz on interictal or ictal ECoG was associated with a better seizure outcome. Others reported that functionally-important areas may generate HFOs of a physiological nature during rest as well as sensorimotor and cognitive tasks. Resection of sites showing task-related augmentation of HFOs has been reported to indeed result in functional loss following surgery. Thus, some but not all sites showing interictal HFOs are causally associated with seizure generation. Furthermore, evidence suggests that some task-related HFOs can be transiently suppressed by the prior occurrence of interictal spikes. The significance of interictal HFOs should be assessed by taking into account the eloquent cortex, seizure-onset zone, and cortical lesions. Video-EEG and ECoG generally provide useful but still limited information to establish causality in presurgical evaluation. A comprehensive assessment of data derived from multiple modalities is ultimately required for successful management.
    Brain & development 05/2013; 35(8). DOI:10.1016/j.braindev.2013.04.004 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interiktale epilepsietypische Aktivität (ETA) besteht aus spitzen/scharfen Potenzialen, iktale ETA aus rhythmischen Mustern. Physiologische scharf konturierte Potenziale existieren in Form von λ-Wellen, „positive occipital sharp transients of sleep“ (POSTS) und Vertex-Wellen sowie auch manchmal ungewöhnlich spitz konfiguriertem α- und μ-Rhythmus. Zudem gibt es physiologische rhythmische Muster wie hypnagoge θ-Gruppen im Kindesalter und intermittierende rhythmische δ-Aktivität unter Hyperventilation. Aufgrund ihrer ähnlichen morphologischen Eigenschaften besteht die Gefahr ihrer Überinterpretation als ETA. Dies gilt auch für den pathologischen Knochenlückenrhythmus und verschiedene Muster ohne gesicherten Bezug zu Epilepsien, die entweder eine spitze, scharfe Form oder einen hervorstechenden rhythmischen Charakter haben: 6-Hz-“spike-wave“-Komplexe, benigne epileptiforme Transienten des Schlafs (BETS),14- und 6-Hz-positive Spitzen, „wicket spikes“, „subclinical rhythmic electrographic discharges of adults“ (SREDA) und rhythmisches temporales θ der Schläfrigkeit. Die Hauptkriterien, diese nichtepilepsietypischen Muster von ETA differenzieren zu können, werden diskutiert, um Epilesiefehldiagnosen, beruhend auf Überinterpretation dieser Aktivitäten, vermeiden zu können.
    Zeitschrift für Epileptologie 11/2011; 24(4). DOI:10.1007/s10309-011-0225-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Summary form only given. Techniques of optical spectroscopy - fluorescence emission and Raman and elastic scattering - can be used to diagnose diseased tissue and extract biochemical and morphological information. Data can be obtained in real time during clinical procedures using optical fiber contact probes, needles, and endoscopic imaging techniques. Clinical results and their biological basis are presented. Prospects for spectral imaging in two and three dimensions are discussed.
Show more