Article

[Reasons for referral to a gerontopsychiatric department].

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Vivantes Klinikum Hellersdorf, Myslowitzer Strasse 45, 12621 Berlin.
Der Nervenarzt (Impact Factor: 0.86). 04/2008; 79(3):340-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The need of specific gerontopsychiatric wards has not been estimated thus far, although psychiatric disorders are very common among the elderly.
The purpose of this study was to describe reasons for referral of old patients to a psychiatric department providing full services for 252,000 inhabitants.
All 975 admissions within 2 years were evaluated in this prospective study.
During the study period 645 patients aged over 64 years were admitted 830 times to the gerontopsychiatric wards. About half of them were referred by physicians in private practice, about 30% came via the emergency room, and 18% were transferred from other departments or hospitals. The most frequent reasons for referral were disorientation, confusion, or delirious states (31.9%), hallucinations or delusion (21.6%), aggression or excitation (17.7%), depression (17.6%), refusal of feeding or drinking (14.4%), agitation or restlessness (13.9%), suicidality or suicide attempt (13.3%), and disruptive behaviour (13.0%). In 81.8% of the cases, behaviour endangering themselves or others was an important cause of referral. The amount of specific gerontopsychiatric beds needed in hospital was estimated as ten beds per 10,000 inhabitants aged 65 or more.
The greatest proportion of the patients referred to gerontopsychiatric wards showed behaviour endangering themselves or others-typical indications for psychiatric inpatient treatment.

0 Followers
 · 
70 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. The growing geriatric population in the United States (US) has prompted better understanding of treatment of the elderly in the hospital and emergency room (ER) settings. This study examines factors influencing the disposition of psychogeriatric patients after their initial presentation in the ER. Methods. Data was collected on patients 65 years of age or older arriving at the ER of a large urban hospital in the USA (January 2009-December 2010). Results. Of the total subjects (n = 95) included in the study, majority were females (66.3%) with an average age of 75.5 years. The chief complaint for psychogeriatric patients coming to the ER was delirium (61.6%). Caucasians were significantly more likely than African-American patients to get a psychiatric consult (33% versus 9%). Patients with delirium were less likely than patients with other psychiatric complaints to get a psychiatric consult in the ER (1.2% versus 47.2%) and less likely to be referred to a psychiatric inpatient unit compared to patients with other psychiatric complaints (2.4% versus 16.7%). Conclusion. Even though delirium is the most common reason for ER visits among psychogeriatric patients, very few delirium patients got a psychiatric consultation in the ER. A well-equipped geriatric psychiatry unit can manage delirium and associated causes.
    03/2014; 2014:413572. DOI:10.1155/2014/413572
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensions of agitation in dementia patients using the Turkish version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-T). The study included 100 patients diagnosed as dementia, according to the DSM-IV-TR. The CMAI-T was administered to the patients' caregivers via face-to-face interviews. The Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE) was used to assess cognitive functions. The severity of depression and the functional state of the patients were assessed using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Principal component analysis and varimax rotation were used to determine the factor structure of the CMAI-T. Factor analysis of the CMAI-T indicated a 3-factor structure: physically aggressive agitation, verbal agitation, and physically non-aggressive agitation. In 92% of the patients there was ≥1 agitation behavior during the previous 2 weeks. The CMAI-T total and factor scores were negatively correlated with the SMMSE scores, and positively correlated with the CSDD and the FAQ scores. The CMAI-T yielded 3 factors (physically aggressive agitation, verbal agitation, and physically non-aggressive agitation), which indicated the scale had construct validity. Agitation behaviors were associated with cognitive dysfunction, symptoms of depression and general level of functioning. Additional research is necessary to identify the predictors of these dimensions in different dementia samples, and to determine the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
    Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry 01/2014; 26(2). DOI:10.5080/u7628 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The German mental healthcare system is currently undergoing discussions regarding the assessment of mental healthcare quality and the identification of potentials for optimizing mental healthcare. Quality assurance projects play an important role in the optimization of the care for the mentally ill in Germany. This review describes the most recent results of quality assurance programs from Germany as identified by a systematic literature search covering the time span 1 January 2008 until 1 June 2009. The German mental healthcare system is characterized by a high degree of structural quality. Quality assurance research in German mental healthcare is multifaceted and several projects are underway to determine the cost-effectiveness of procedures in mental healthcare and the development of quality indicators. In Germany, mental healthcare research is a rapidly developing field. Potentials for improvements can be identified in the assessment of process and outcome quality, the regional distribution, and the coordination among service providers. More studies are needed to identify the best methods to assess quality in mental healthcare with a view to improve process and outcome quality.
    Current opinion in psychiatry 09/2009; 22(6):636-42. DOI:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283317c00 · 3.55 Impact Factor