Article

Teaching Rounds: Teaching when time is limited

University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0410, USA.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 03/2008; 336(7640):384-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39456.727199.AD
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinical teachers face a daunting challenge of simultaneously caring for patients and teaching learners in a time constrained environment. A cohort study of 179 Dutch medical students (79% of the cohort) during an internal medicine clerkship located at 14 different clinical sites found that the quality of supervision has a greater impact on clinical competence and knowledge than does the number of patients seen.1 Even small moments of teaching time can offer important learning opportunities to trainees by providing them with new insights and skills that they would not acquire from simply seeing patients on their own.1To achieve this combined caring and teaching goal in a time efficient manner, clinical teachers use various strategies to (a) identify the needs of each individual learner, (b) teach according to these specific needs, and (c) provide feedback on performance.2 This three step teaching process can be adapted to the environment in which the teaching is taking place. Here we describe several time efficient strategies in relation to each step in this process.

Full-text

Available from: David M Irby, May 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
103 Views
  • 12/2014; 5(1). DOI:10.1016/j.tacc.2014.12.001
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The “One-Minute Preceptor” is a well-known and widely used clinical teaching model which consists of five primary microskills: (1) get a commitment, (2) probe for supporting evidence, (3) teach general rules, (4) reinforce what was right, and (5) correct mistakes. In order to obtain a baseline measurement of the use of these microskills in an established clinical department, we shadowed medical students during rounding experiences and clinical tutorials throughout an 8-week clinical rotation and recorded their exposure to the microskills; combining the latter two into a single domain of “feedback.” We recorded the presence or absence of each microskill within 15-min intervals. Overall, commitment, probing, teaching, and feedback occurred in 49.0, 20.2, 89.9, and 41.8 % of the 15-min intervals, respectively. This observational strategy was an innovative approach to observe the quality and quantity of clinical teaching and provides a baseline to determine the impact of faculty development programs to improve clinical teaching.
    Medical Science Educator 10/2014; DOI:10.1007/s40670-014-0074-6 · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Receiving feedback on daily clinical activities, in whatever form, is crucial for the development of clinical proficiency. Multisource or 360-degree feedback procedures have been recommended to include various co-workers as sources of feedback. In 2008, a web-based multisource feedback (MSF) tool for medical residents was developed at the University Medical Center Utrecht and launched nationally in the Netherlands and has been widely used since then. In 2012, an evaluation was carried out to collect opinions on its use, on the quality of the instrument and on its experienced effectiveness. We approached 408 residents and 59 residency programme directors with an anonymous online survey.Completed surveys were received from 108 residents (26 %) and 22 programme directors (37 %). The tool was well received among the respondents and proved to be a simple, efficient and effective instrument to prepare for information-rich progress interviews of programme directors with their residents. Despite a relatively low response rate, indications were found for the effectiveness of MSF use at four levels of Kirkpatrick's hierarchy based on user impressions: reaction, learning, behaviour change, and impact. This MSF tool, designed for effective formative feedback, was found to meet its purpose and was well received.
    03/2015; 4(2). DOI:10.1007/s40037-015-0173-0