Neuro-regulation of lower esophageal sphincter function as treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

World Journal of Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 2.37). 03/2008; 14(7):985-90.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The junction between the esophagus and the stomach is a specialized region, composed of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and its adjacent anatomical structures, the gastric sling and crural diaphragm. Together these structures work in a coordinated manner to allow ingested food into the stomach while preventing reflux of gastric contents across the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) into the esophagus. The same zone also permits retrograde passage of air and gastric contents into esophagus during belching and vomiting. The precise coordination required to execute such a complicated task is achieved by a finely-regulated high-pressure zone. This zone keeps the junction between esophagus and stomach continuously closed, but is still able to relax briefly via input from inhibitory neurons that are responsible for its innervation. Alterations of the structure and function of the EGJ and the LES may predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Download full-text


Available from: George Triadafilopoulos, Nov 03, 2014
16 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Induction of gastroesophageal reflux after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may have an impact on the progression of esophageal injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the acute effect of RFCA on distal esophageal acidity using leadless pH-metry capsules. A total of 31 patients (27 male and 4 female; 25 with paroxysmal AF) who underwent RFCA and esophagoscopy 24 hours before and after ablation were assessed for reflux and esophageal lesions. A leadless pH-metry capsule was inserted into the lower esophagus to screen for pH changes, number and duration of refluxes, and the DeMeester score (a standardized measure of acidity and reflux). No patient had a history of reflux or was taking proton pump inhibitors within 4 weeks before and 24 hours after ablation. Five patients (16.1%) who presented with asymptomatic reflux prior to ablation were excluded from further examination. Of the remaining 26 patients, 5 (19.2%) demonstrated a significant pathologic increase in DeMeester score after ablation. No statistical differences in baseline parameters, method of sedation, ablation approach, and total energy delivered on the posterior wall were observed between patients with and those without a pathologic DeMeester score. One patient with asymptomatic reflux prior to ablation developed esophageal ulceration. A significant number of patients undergoing RFCA of AF develop pathologic acid reflux after ablation. In addition, a subgroup of patients has a preexisting condition of asymptomatic reflux prior to ablation. This finding may explain a potential mechanism for progression of esophageal injury to atrio-esophageal fistulas in patients undergoing RFCA.
    Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society 07/2009; 6(10):1457-62. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.06.022 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anticholinergic effects of medications are factors in autonomic control of the lower esophageal sphincter function. Changes in sphincter control often lead to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a chronic disease with a prevalence of up to 25% for adults. This effect is a consideration in the treatment of depression, the fourth-leading disease burden. Lower esophageal-sphincter changes are well documented in association with tricyclic antidepressants. The newer medications, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, are often used as first-line agents. This case report reviews the emergence of GERD in association with the use of newer agents.The patient, a 55-year-old woman, presented to her primary care physician with complaints of low energy, dysphoric mood, and anhedonia of several months' duration. Trials of citalopram and escitalopram were associated with reports of persistent nausea and gastric reflux unresolved by changes in dosing schedule or positioning. Over-the-counter omeprazole on an as-needed basis was added. Ultimately, the patient was successfully managed with desvenlafaxine for dysphoric mood and low energy and scheduled administration of omeprazole for GERD. The adverse drug reaction was evaluated using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. This methodology indicated a probable relationship (score of 7 out of 12) between initiation of antidepressant therapy and the presentation of GERD symptoms.When evaluating patient response to medication, inquiring about new-onset symptoms may help assess pharmacotherapy, identify potential medication-related effects such as the anticholinergic profile, evaluate the need to add an antisecretory/antispasmodic agent, or consider an alternative treatment strategy.
    The Consultant pharmacist: the journal of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists 04/2011; 26(4):274-8. DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2011.274
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease may be clinical or surgical. The clinical consists basically of the use of drugs; however, there are new techniques to complement this treatment, osteopathic intervention in the diaphragmatic muscle is one these. The objective of the study is to compare pressure values in the examination of esophageal manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and immediately after osteopathic intervention in the diaphragm muscle. Thirty-eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - 16 submitted to sham technique and 22 submitted osteopathic technique - were randomly selected. The average respiratory pressure (ARP) and the maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) of the LES were measured by manometry before and after osteopathic technique at the point of highest pressure. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney, and magnitude of the technique proposed was measured using the Cohen's index. Statistically significant difference in the osteopathic technique was found in three out of four in relation to the group of patients who performed the sham technique for the following measures of LES pressure: ARP with P= 0.027. The MEP had no statistical difference (P= 0.146). The values of Cohen d for the same measures were: ARP with d= 0.80 and MEP d= 0.52. Osteopathic manipulative technique produces a positive increment in the LES region soon after its performance.
    Diseases of the Esophagus 06/2012; 26(5). DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01372.x · 1.78 Impact Factor
Show more