Article

Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: A multi-gene study

The Structural Genomics Consortium, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Protein Expression and Purification (Impact Factor: 1.51). 06/2008; 59(1):94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The efficiency of heterologous protein production in Escherichia coli (E. coli) can be diminished by biased codon usage. Approaches normally used to overcome this problem include targeted mutagenesis to remove rare codons or the addition of rare codon tRNAs in specific cell lines. Recently, improvements in technology have enabled cost-effective production of synthetic genes, making this a feasible alternative. To explore this option, the expression patterns in E. coli of 30 human short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase genes (SDRs) were analyzed in three independent experiments, comparing the native and synthetic (codon-optimized) versions of each gene. The constructs were prepared in a pET-derived vector that appends an N-terminal polyhistidine tag to the protein; expression was induced using IPTG and soluble proteins were isolated by Ni-NTA metal-affinity chromatography. Expression of the native and synthetic gene constructs was compared in two isogenic bacterial strains, one of which contained a plasmid (pRARE2) that carries seven tRNAs recognizing rare codons. Although we found some degree of variability between experiments, in normal E. coli synthetic genes could be expressed and purified more readily than the native version. In only one case was native gene expression better. Importantly, in most but not all cases, expression of the native genes in combination with rare codon tRNAs mimicked the behavior of the synthetic genes in the native strain. The trend is that heterologous expression of some proteins in bacteria can be improved by altering codon preference, but that this effect can be generally recapitulated by introducing rare codon tRNAs into the host cell.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nicola A Burgess-Brown, Apr 28, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
156 Views
  • Source
    • "Production of therapeutic proteins in a soluble and biologically functional form is desired for safety reasons and can significantly simplify downstream purification processes. There has been much effort spent to develop methods to improve soluble protein production from E. coli [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]. Production of a desired protein as a fusion protein in E. coli is a common approach to increase the efficiency of expression of soluble protein and to simplify its purification. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein production can be improved if methods for soluble protein expression are developed. Interferon consensus (IFN-con) is used to treat hepatitis C. IFN-con has superior activity compared to other clinically used interferon α subtypes. However IFN-con is a challenging protein to produce in a soluble form using an E.coli expression system. Here we describe the expression of soluble and active recombinant IFN-con in E. coli. The IFN-con gene sequence was optimised for expression in E.coli, which was then cloned into the Champion™ pET SUMO expression vector downstream of the SUMO fusion protein and under strong T7lac promoter. The SUMO-IFN-con fusion protein was efficiently expressed using the SHuffle™ E.coli strain and existed in soluble form as 86-88% of the total IFN-con. After removal of the SUMO fusion partner, approximately 50 mg of recombinant IFN-con of at least 98% purity (by RP-HPLC) was obtained from a 1L fermentation culture. Using an A549/EMCV antiviral assay, the specific activity of the recombinant IFN-con was determined to be 960 ×106 IU/mg as calculated to NIBSC standard for IFN-con (3x105 pfu/mL virus titre). Comparison of the antiviral activity of the produced IFN-con to IFN α -2a showed that IFN-con displays 2.8 times greater activity, which is in good agreement with what has been reported in the literature for pure protein. IFN-con expression in a soluble form from E. coli allowed us to use a simple, two-step purification process to yield highly pure and active IFN-con which is more efficient than obtaining IFN-con from inclusion bodies.
    Protein Expression and Purification 07/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2014.03.009 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Paramount factors to obtain high yields of protein are gene of interest, expression vector, gene dosage, transcriptional regulation, codon usage, translational regulation , host design, growth media and culture conditions or fermentation conditions available for manipulating the expression conditions, specific activity or biological activity of the protein of interest, protein targeting, fusion proteins, molecular chaperones, protein degradation [3] [4] [5] [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, high yield expression of proteins in E. coli has witnessed rapid progress with developments of new methodologies and technologies. An important advancement has been the development of novel recombinant cloning approaches and protocols to express heterologous proteins for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) studies and for isotopic enrichment. Isotope labeling in NMR is necessary for rapid acquisition of high dimensional spectra for structural studies. In addition, higher yield of proteins using various solubility and affinity tags has made protein over-expression cost-effective. Taken together, these methods have opened new avenues for structural studies of proteins and their interactions. This article deals with the different techniques that are employed for over-expression of proteins in E. coli and different methods used for isotope labeling of proteins vis-à-vis NMR spectroscopy.
    Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 06/2013; 4(06):751-767. DOI:10.4236/abb.2013.46099
  • Source
    • "For example, mutations that affect that translation rate may cause diseases, and viruses tend to exhibit adaptation to the tRNA pool of their host; thus, gene translation is strongly related to human health [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In addition, manipulating the translation efficiency of genes may have important biotechnological applications [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Finally, it is impossible to understand evolution [3], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], functional genomics [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], and systems biology [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [23], [5] without considering translation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A central biological process in all living organisms is gene translation. Developing a deeper understanding of this complex process may have ramifications to almost every biomedical discipline. Reuveni et al. recently proposed a new computational model of gene translation called the Ribosome Flow Model (RFM). In this paper, we consider a particular case of this model, called the Homogeneous Ribosome Flow Model (HRFM). From a biological viewpoint, this corresponds to the case where the transition rates of all the coding sequence codons are identical. This regime has been suggested recently based on experiments in mouse embryonic cells. We consider the steady-state distribution of the HRFM. We provide formulas that relate the different parameters of the model in steady state. We prove the following properties: 1) the ribosomal density profile is monotonically decreasing along the coding sequence; 2) the ribosomal density at each codon monotonically increases with the initiation rate; and 3) for a constant initiation rate, the translation rate monotonically decreases with the length of the coding sequence. In addition, we analyze the translation rate of the HRFM at the limit of very high and very low initiation rate, and provide explicit formulas for the translation rate in these two cases. We discuss the relationship between these theoretical results and biological findings on the translation process.
    IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics / IEEE, ACM 11/2012; 9(6):1724-1736. DOI:10.1109/TCBB.2012.120 · 1.54 Impact Factor