Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to predict reparability of longitudinal full-thickness meniscus lesions
Centre Hospitalier A Mignot, Versailles, France.Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (Impact Factor: 3.05). 03/2008; 16(5):482-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0479-5
Prediction of meniscus reparability is useful for surgeons to optimise surgical scheduling and to inform patients about postoperative management. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of MRI in predicting the reparability of longitudinal full-thickness meniscus lesions. We studied 100 MRIs of longitudinal full-thickness medial or lateral meniscus lesions located from the meniscosynovial junction to the axial part of the meniscus. The MRI criteria of reparability were a peripheral rim smaller than 4 mm and a lesion longer than 10 mm. At arthroscopy the menisci were considered as reparable when the lesion was located in red-red or red-white zones and when it was more than 1 cm in length. A heterogeneous or homogeneous aspect of the meniscus body was also considered. The length of the meniscus lesion averaged 17.6 mm and the thickness of the rim 3.4 mm. A heterogeneous signal of the axial fragment and of the rim was found in 11 cases and in 48 cases, respectively. In 90 cases, there was no difference between the MRI-predicted reparability and the arthroscopic findings. Global sensitivity of MRI to determine reparability of full-thickness meniscus lesions was 94%, increasing to 96% for the medial meniscus and dropping to 83% for the lateral meniscus. Global specificity was 81%, and was higher for the lateral meniscus (90%) than for the medial one (82%). Global positive predictive value was 0.94 and global negative predictive value was 0.82. A heterogeneous aspect of the rim did not compromise arthroscopic reparability whereas a heterogeneous aspect of the axial fragment indicated an irreparable meniscus. The described MRI criteria can predict meniscus reparability. Their accuracy is limited for lateral meniscus lesions close to the popliteal hiatus and for very young active patients in whom repair of white-white lesions can be attempted. Longitudinal full-thickness meniscus lesions are a good indication for repair in young active patients.
- Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 12/2009; 95(8). DOI:10.1016/j.rcot.2009.09.008
Article: MR imaging of the knee[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Since its introduction into clinical use, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become well established in the diagnosis of injuries of the knee joint and has replaced diagnostic arthroscopy as the primary evaluation method. Traumatic lesions of the ligaments, menisci, and articular surfaces are common injuries that can be confidently detected using MRI. This article reviews the basic principles of the examination technique of the knee, the normal MRI anatomy of the internal joint structures, and the typical findings in injuries of the cruciate ligaments, collateral ligaments, and mensci, in traumatic dislocation of the patella, and in acute osteochondral lesions.Der Radiologe 02/2008; 47(12):1131-43; quiz 1144-5. DOI:10.1007/s00132-008-1212-x · 0.43 Impact Factor
Article: MR Imaging of the Knee[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for the imaging evaluation of the knee. Moreover, advances in magnetic field strength, gradient strength, and coil design have facilitated the development of new pulse sequences, which have transformed knee MRI from routine morphologic imaging to metabolic imaging and imaging of ultrastructure. This article will review MRI of meniscal injury and anterior cruciate ligament injury, as well as new developments in MRI of the knee such as 3 T imaging and techniques for cartilage imaging such as T2 mapping, T1ñ, and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage.Sports medicine and arthroscopy review 04/2009; 17(1):56-67. DOI:10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181974353 · 1.68 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.