Article

Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: an open randomised trial

Imelda Gastrointestinal Clinical Research Centre, Bonheiden, Belgium.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 03/2008; 371(9613):660-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60304-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Most patients who have active Crohn's disease are treated initially with corticosteroids. Although this approach usually controls symptoms, many patients become resistant to or dependent on corticosteroids, and long exposure is associated with an increased risk of mortality. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of early use of combined immunosuppression with conventional management in patients with active Crohn's disease who had not previously received glucocorticoids, antimetabolites, or infliximab.
We did a 2-year open-label randomised trial at 18 centres in Belgium, Holland, and Germany between May, 2001, and January, 2004. We randomly assigned 133 patients to either early combined immunosuppression or conventional treatment. The 67 patients assigned to combined immunosuppression received three infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg of bodyweight) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with azathioprine. We gave additional treatment with infliximab and, if necessary, corticosteroids, to control disease activity. 66 patients assigned to conventional management received corticosteroids, followed, in sequence, by azathioprine and infliximab. The primary outcome measures were remission without corticosteroids and without bowel resection at weeks 26 and 52. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00554710.
Four patients (two in each group) did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 26, 39 (60.0%) of 65 patients in the combined immunosuppression group were in remission without corticosteroids and without surgical resection, compared with 23 (35.9%) of 64 controls, for an absolute difference of 24.1% (95% CI 7.3-40.8, p=0.0062). Corresponding rates at week 52 were 40/65 (61.5%) and 27/64 (42.2%) (absolute difference 19.3%, 95% CI 2.4-36.3, p=0.0278). 20 of the 65 patients (30.8%) in the early combined immunosuppression group had serious adverse events, compared with 19 of 64 (25.3%) controls (p=1.0).
Combined immunosuppression was more effective than conventional management for induction of remission and reduction of corticosteroid use in patients who had been recently diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Initiation of more intensive treatment early in the course of the disease could result in better outcomes.

1 Follower
 · 
145 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. Real-world epidemiological data on tuberculosis (TB) infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving TNF-α inhibitors are scarce. We investigated the risks for and case characteristics of TB in a large cohort of IBD patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors in Korea, where TB is endemic. Materials and methods. We performed an observational study on all TB cases identified in a cohort of 873 IBD subjects treated with TNF-α inhibitors from January 2001 to December 2013. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of TB was calculated using data from the matched general population. Results. A total of 25 newly developed TB cases were identified in the cohort (pulmonary TB, 84% [21/25]; extrapulmonary TB, 16% [4/25]). The adjusted SIR of TB was 41.7 (95% confidence interval, 25.3–58.0), compared with that of the matched general population. Nineteen of the 25 patients (76%) developed TB within 2–62 months of initiation of TNF-α inhibitor treatment despite screening negative for latent TB infection (LTBI), whereas three patients with LTBI (12%, 3/25) developed TB 3 months after completion of chemoprophylaxis. The outcomes of TB treatment were mostly favorable, although one death from peritoneal TB was noted. The type of TNF-α inhibitor prescribed (infliximab) was a significant predictor of TB (p = 0.033). Conclusions. TNF-α inhibitor treatment strikingly increases the risk of TB infection in an IBD population from a TB endemic area. Continuous evaluation of the development of de novo TB infection in IBD patients subjected to long-term TNF inhibitor therapy is mandatory.
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2015; 50(3). DOI:10.3109/00365521.2014.1000960 · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: TNF-α antagonists have transformed the treatment of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is the third TNF-α antagonist to be approved for use in the United States but is not currently approved in Europe.Areas covered: This review evaluates the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of CZP in CD. Safety, immunogenicity and its use in pregnancy have also been assessed. A literature search was conducted using Pub Med (2004 – 2014) for the terms ‘Crohn’s disease’ and ‘certolizumab pegol’ or ‘certolizumab’ or ‘cimzia’. Additional studies were identified from other sources including citation.Expert opinion: As a Fab’ fragment, CZP is effective in binding TNF-α, but does not cause Fc-mediated effects. PEGylation has improved its pharmacokinetic profile and allowed for an increased half-life of 2 weeks. Benefit for inducing response (an improvement in symptoms) and maintenance of remission has been shown. However, the benefit is less clear for the more stringent end-points of inducing remission and mucosal healing. There may be an advantage from the PEGylated formulation of CZP in terms of reduced injection-site reactions, reduced placental transfer in pregnancy and as a treatment option in patients who are unable to tolerate infliximab.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &amp Toxicology 01/2015; 11(2). DOI:10.1517/17425255.2015.995166 · 2.93 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
12 Downloads
Available from
Sep 11, 2014