Survey of Trauma Registry Data on Tourniquet Use in Pediatric War Casualties

U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Ft. Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 03/2008; 64(2):295-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163b875
Source: PubMed


There have been no large cohort reports detailing the wounding patterns and mechanisms in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Joint Theater Trauma Registry was queried for all US service members receiving treatment for wounds (International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes 800-960) sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom from October 2001 through January 2005. Returned-to-duty and nonbattle injuries were excluded from final analysis.
This query resulted in 3,102 casualties, of which 31% were classified as nonbattle injuries and 18% were returned-to-duty within 72 hours. A total of 1,566 combatants sustained 6,609 combat wounds. The locations of these wounds were as follows: head (8%), eyes (6%), ears (3%), face (10%), neck (3%), thorax (6%), abdomen (11%), and extremity (54%). The proportion of head and neck wounds is higher (p < 0.0001) than the proportion experienced in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam wars (16%-21%). The proportion of thoracic wounds is a decrease (p < 0.0001) from World War II and Vietnam (13%). The proportion of gunshot wounds was 18%, whereas the proportion sustained from explosions was 78%.
The wounding patterns currently seen in Iraq and Afghanistan resemble the patterns from previous conflicts, with some notable exceptions: a greater proportion of head and neck wounds, and a lower proportion of thoracic wounds. An explosive mechanism accounted for 78% of injuries, which is the highest proportion seen in any large-scale conflict.

Download full-text


Available from: Charles Wade, Dec 13, 2013
153 Reads
  • Source
    • "The introduction of individual body armour has resulted in significant reductions in the incidence and severity of wounds sustained by soldiers on combat operations in the modern age [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. However there is a constant drive to develop novel methods of providing protection as well as to refine existing designs of body armour [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: There is a requirement in the Ministry of Defence for an objective method of comparing the area of coverage of different body armour designs for future applications. Existing comparisons derived from surface wound mapping are limited in that they can only demonstrate the skin entry wound location. The Coverage of Armour Tool (COAT) is a novel three-dimensional model capable of comparing the coverage provided by body armour designs, but limited information exists as to which anatomical structures require inclusion. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of COAT, in the assessment of neck protection, using clinically relevant injury data. Method: Hospital notes and post mortem records of all UK soldiers injured by an explosive fragment to the neck between 01 Jan 2006 and 31 December 2012 from Iraq and Afghanistan were analysed to determine which anatomical structures were responsible for death or functional disability at one year post injury. Using COAT a comparison of three ballistic neck collar designs was undertaken with reference to the percentage of these anatomical structures left exposed. Results: 13/81 (16%) survivors demonstrated complications at one year, most commonly upper limb weakness from brachial plexus injury or a weak voice from laryngeal trauma. In 14/94 (15%) soldiers the neck wound was believed to have been the sole cause of death, primarily from carotid artery damage, spinal cord transection or rupture of the larynx. COAT objectively demonstrated that despite the larger OSPREY collar having almost double the surface area than the two-piece prototype collar, the percentage area of vulnerable cervical structures left exposed only reduced from 16.3% to 14.4%. Discussion: COAT demonstrated its ability to objectively quantify the potential effectiveness of different body armour designs in providing coverage of vulnerable anatomical structures from different shot line orientations. To improve its utility, it is recommended that COAT be further developed to enable weapon and tissue specific information to be modelled, and that clinically significant injuries to other body regions are also incorporated.
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 10/2014; 52(8):e125. DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.247 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Modern military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan emphasize the use of explosive devices, and as a result, about 80% of combat-related injuries are associated with blast injury (Owens et al., 2008; Warden, 2006). Due to advances in the quality of protective equipment worn by servicemen, casualties resulting from explosive blasts are less common, and injuries are less severe than in previous conflicts (Warden, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The increased use of explosives in combat has resulted in a large number of returning veterans suffering from blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and self-reported complications. It remains unclear whether this increase in self-reported difficulties is unique to the blast mechanism or stressful preinjury environment and whether cognitive-functioning deficits correspond with these difficulties in the postacute phase. This study examined the relationship between cognitive performance and self-reported psychological and somatic symptoms of blast-related mTBI compared with civilian mTBI, independent of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Twelve veterans with blast-related mTBI were compared to 18 individuals with civilian mTBI on cognitive tests and self-report questionnaires. Univariate analyses failed to reveal differences on any individual cognitive test. Further, veterans reported more psychological and somatic complaints. These self-reported difficulties were not significantly correlated with neuropsychological performance. Overall, preliminary results suggest that in the postacute phase, subjective complaints related to blast-related mTBI do not covary with objective cognitive performance. Additionally, cognitive outcomes from blast-related mTBI were similar to those of civilian forms of mTBI. Future studies should identify the cognitive and self-reported sequelae of blast-related mTBI independent of comorbid PTSD in a larger sample of veterans.
    Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 06/2014; 22(2):1-9. DOI:10.1080/23279095.2013.845823 · 0.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Also, the wounding pattern in the Iraqi conflict had notable differences from the patterns in previous conflicts. There was a greater proportion of head and neck wounds than in World War 2, and the Korea and Vietnam wars (30% vs. 16–21%, P < 0.001), and a lower proportion of thoracic wounds than in World War 2 and Vietnam (6% vs. 13%, P < 0.001) [5]. Notably, this study shows that penile injuries were caused by IEDs in 67% of patients and by individual arms in 33%, while injuries to the posterior urethra were caused by IEDs in only 17% and by individual firearms in 83% (Table 1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To determine the incidence, mechanism of injury, wounding pattern and surgical management of urethral and penile injuries sustained in civil violence during the Iraq war. Patients and methods In all, 2800 casualties with penetrating trauma to the abdomen and pelvis were received at the Al-Yarmouk Hospital, Baghdad, from January 2004 to June 2008. Of these casualties 504 (18%) had genitourinary trauma, including 45 (8.9%) with urethral and/or penile injuries. Results Of 45 patients, 29 (64%) were civilians and 16 (36%) were Iraqi military personnel. The injury was caused by an improvised explosive device (IED) in 25 (56%) patients and by individual firearms in 20 (44%). Of the patients, 24 had penile injuries, 15 had an injury to the bulbar urethra and six had an injury to the posterior urethra. Anterior urethral injuries were managed by primary repair, while posterior urethral injuries were managed by primary realignment in five patients and by a suprapubic cystostomy alone in one. An associated injury to major blood vessels was the cause of death in eight of nine patients who died soon after surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusion Urethral and penile injuries were caused by IEDs and individual firearms with a similar frequency. Most of the casualties were civilians and a minority were military personnel. Injuries to the anterior urethra can be managed by primary repair, while injuries to the posterior urethra can be managed by primary realignment. An associated trauma to major blood vessels was the leading cause of death in these casualties.
    Arab Journal of Urology 06/2014; 12(2). DOI:10.1016/j.aju.2013.11.002
Show more