Physical Performance and Risk of Hip Fractures in Older Men

Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94107-1762, USA.
Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (Impact Factor: 6.59). 07/2008; 23(7):1037-44. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080227
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of these analyses was to describe the association between physical performance and risk of hip fractures in older men. Performance on five physical function exams (leg power, grip strength, usual walking pace, narrow walk balance test, and five repeated chair stands) was assessed in 5902 men >or=65 yr of age. Performance (time to complete or strength) was analyzed as quartiles, with an additional category for unable to complete the measure, in proportional hazards models. Follow-up averaged 5.3 yr; 77 incident hip fractures were confirmed by physician review of radiology reports. Poor physical performance was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. In particular, repeated chair stand performance was strongly related to hip fracture risk. Men unable to complete this exam were much more likely to experience a hip fracture than men in the fastest quartile of this test (multivariate hazard ratio [MHR]: 8.15; 95% CI: 2.65, 25.03). Men with the worst performance (weakest/slowest quartile or unable) on at least three exams had an increased risk of hip fracture compared with men with higher functioning (MHR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.46, 6.73). Nearly two thirds of the hip fractures (N = 49, 64%) occurred in men with poor performance on at least three exams. Poor physical function is independently associated with an increased risk of hip fracture in older men. The repeated chair stands exam should be considered in clinical settings for evaluation of hip fracture risk. Concurrent poor performance on multiple physical function exams is associated with an increased risk of hip fractures.

Download full-text


Available from: Robin L Fullman, Aug 24, 2015
  • Source
    • "Osteoporosis is a metabolic disorder which is characterized by deterioration of bone tissue and loss of bone mass with a consequent increased risk of fracture. It is due to decreased activities of osteoblasts and increased activities of osteoclasts [1]. In both sexes, estrogens and testosterones play a vital role in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oxidative stress and free radicals have been implicated in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Therefore, antioxidant compounds have the potential to be used in the prevention and treatment of the disease. In this study, we investigated the effects of virgin coconut oil (VCO) on bone microarchitecture in a postmenopausal osteoporosis rat model. VCO is a different form of coconut oil as it is rich with antioxidants. Three-month-old female rats were randomly grouped into baseline, sham-operated, ovariectomized control (Ovx), and ovariectomized rats fed with 8% VCO in their diet for six weeks (Ovx+VCO). Bone histomorphometry of the right femora was carried out at the end of the study. Rats supplemented with VCO had a significantly greater bone volume and trabecular number while trabecular separation was lower than the Ovx group. In conclusion, VCO was effective in maintaining bone structure and preventing bone loss in estrogen-deficient rat model.
    Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 09/2012; 2012(3):237236. DOI:10.1155/2012/237236 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: About one in three osteoporotic fractures occur in men, and the consequences of fractures are more severe in men. However, only too few men at high risk of fracture are detected and treated. There is no consensus definition of osteoporosis in men based on bone mineral density (BMD), and therapeutic decisions should be based on absolute fracture risk as estimated from age, BMD, fracture history, and additional clinical risk factors. In men, secondary osteoporosis deserves particular attention. Genetically determined alterations of bone mass acquisition during growth are involved in idiopathic osteoporosis in the young, whereas senile osteoporosis involves progressive bone loss throughout adult life. Estradiol appears to be the predominant sex steroid involved in regulation of bone maturation and metabolism. The evidence base for the long-term efficacy and safety of therapies for osteoporosis in men, including the bone-active agents (i.e. bisphosphonates and teriparatide), is limited, so that they should be applied with discernment based on clinical judgement and careful estimation of fracture risk.
    Best Practice & Research: Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 11/2008; 22(5):787-812. DOI:10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.005 · 4.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the validity of a parsimonious frailty index (components: weight loss, inability to rise from a chair, and poor energy (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index)) with that of the more complex Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) index (components: unintentional weight loss, low grip strength, poor energy, slowness, and low physical activity) for prediction of adverse outcomes in older men. Prospective cohort study. Six U.S. centers. Three thousand one hundred thirty-two men aged 67 and older. Frailty status categorized as robust, intermediate stage, or frail using the SOF index and criteria similar to those used in CHS index. Falls were reported three times for 1 year. Disability (>or=1 new impairments in performing instrumental activities of daily living) ascertained at 1 year. Fractures and deaths ascertained during 3 years of follow-up. Analysis of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) statistics compared for models containing the SOF index versus those containing the CHS index. Greater evidence of frailty as defined by either index was associated with greater risk of adverse outcomes. Frail men had a higher age-adjusted risk of recurrent falls (odds ratio (OR)=3.0-3.6), disability (OR=5.3-7.5), nonspine fracture (hazard ratio (HR)=2.2-2.3), and death (HR=2.5-3.5) (P<.001 for all models). AUC comparisons revealed no differences between models with the SOF index and models with the CHS index in discriminating falls (AUC=0.63, P=.97), disability (AUC=0.68, P=.86), nonspine fracture (AUC=0.63, P=.90), or death (AUC=0.71 for model with SOF index and 0.72 for model with CHS index, P=.19). The simple SOF index predicts risk of falls, disability, fracture, and mortality in men as well as the more-complex CHS index.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 02/2009; 57(3):492-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02137.x · 4.22 Impact Factor
Show more