Amount of Time Spent in Sedentary Behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004

Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-1738, USA.
American journal of epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.98). 05/2008; 167(7):875-81. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sedentary behaviors are linked to adverse health outcomes, but the total amount of time spent in these behaviors in the United
States has not been objectively quantified. The authors evaluated participants from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey aged ≥6 years who wore an activity monitor for up to 7 days. Among 6,329 participants with at least one
10-hour day of monitor wear, the average monitor-wearing time was 13.9 hours/day (standard deviation, 1.9). Overall, participants
spent 54.9% of their monitored time, or 7.7 hours/day, in sedentary behaviors. The most sedentary groups in the United States
were older adolescents and adults aged ≥60 years, and they spent about 60% of their waking time in sedentary pursuits. Females
were more sedentary than males before age 30 years, but this pattern was reversed after age 60 years. Mexican-American adults
were significantly less sedentary than other US adults, and White and Black females were similarly sedentary after age 12
years. These data provide the first objective measure of the amount of time spent in sedentary behavior in the US population
and indicate that Americans spend the majority of their time in behaviors that expend very little energy.

Download full-text


Available from: Maciej (Mac) S. Buchowski, Jul 01, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lack of physical activity (PA) is an important modifiable risk factor for bone mineral density (BMD). Time spent in sedentary behaviour (SB), or time spent in non-exercising seated and reclining postures, has recently emerged as a new public health risk, independent of the amount of time someone spends being active. As national surveys report that adults spend on average 8 h per day being sedentary, rising to 10 h a day in older age, it has been hypothesised that a repeated exposure to sitting in modern daily life, whether it is for travelling, working or leisure, might have a deleterious effect on bone health in a way that mirrors the results of studies into the effect of lengthy periods of bed-rest. The aim of this study was to investigate for the first time a) how time spent in SB is associated with bone mineral density (BMD), b) whether this association changes depending on the amount of time spent engaging in different intensity levels of PA, and c) if the pattern of accumulation of SB and long uninterrupted periods of SB are associated with BMD.
    Bone 04/2014; 64. DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.009 · 4.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is generally understood that regular moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) promotes good health from head to toe. Evidence also supports the notion that too much sitting can increase all-cause mortality and risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Moreover, there is evidence that daily MVPA may not offset negative effects of sedentary behavior on systemic risk factors. We extend the discussion to brain structure and function and argue that while MVPA is recognized as a protective behavior against age-related dementia, sedentary behavior may also be an important contributor to brain health and even counteract the benefits of MVPA due to overlapping or interacting mechanistic pathways. Thus, the goals of this review are (1) to outline evidence linking both PA and sedentary behavior to neurobiological systems that are known to influence behavioral outcomes such as cognitive aging and (2) to propose productive areas of future research.
    Mental Health and Physical Activity 03/2014; 7(1). DOI:10.1016/j.mhpa.2014.01.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the SenseWear Pro Armband (SWA) for the measurement of energy expenditure (EE) and step count against a criterion in persons with stroke. Twelve participants with chronic stroke (mean age 64.2 ± 10.4 years; mean gait speed 0.67 ± 0.25 m/sec) completed two trials of a six-minute walk test, while wearing a SenseWear Armband (SWA) on each arm and being continuously monitored using a portable metabolic cart. Agreement between estimates of energy expenditure from the SWA and the metabolic cart was fair for the armband on the hemiplegic arm (intraclass correlation cefficient (ICC) = 0.586) and good for the armband on the unaffected arm (ICC = 0.702). Agreement between the SWA estimate of step count, and step count as measured by the Step Activity Monitor was poor (ICC < 0.352), with significant underestimation by the SWA. Our results show that, for these moderately impaired persons with stroke, the SWA should be used with caution for the measurement of energy expenditure and should not be used to measure step count.
    01/2012; 2012:247165. DOI:10.1155/2012/247165