Article

Cortical differentiation for nouns and verbs depends on grammatical markers.

Centre for Speech, Language, and the Brain, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 4.49). 09/2008; 20(8):1381-9. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20095
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT Here we address the contentious issue of how nouns and verbs are represented in the brain. The co-occurrence of noun and verb deficits with damage to different neural regions has led to the view that they are differentially represented in the brain. Recent neuroimaging evidence and inconsistent lesion-behavior associations challenge this view. We have suggested that nouns and verbs are not differentially represented in the brain, but that different patterns of neural activity are triggered by the different linguistic functions carried by nouns and verbs. We test these claims in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using homophones -- words which function grammatically as nouns or verbs but have the same form and meaning -- ensuring that any neural differences reflect differences in grammatical function. Words were presented as single stems and in phrases in which each homophone was preceded by an article to create a noun phrase (NP) or a pronoun to create a verb phrase (VP), thus establishing the word's functional linguistic role. Activity for single-word homophones was not modulated by their frequency of usage as a noun or verb. In contrast, homophones marked as verbs by appearing in VPs elicited greater activity in the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (LpMTG) compared to homophones marked as nouns by occurring in NPs. Neuropsychological patients with grammatical deficits had lesions which overlapped with the greater LpMTG activity found for VPs. These results suggest that nouns and verbs do not invariably activate different neural regions; rather, differential cortical activity depends on the extent to which their different grammatical functions are engaged.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Verbs and nouns are fundamental units of language, but their neural instantiation remains poorly understood. Neuropsychological research has shown that nouns and verbs can be damaged independently of each other, and neuroimaging research has found that several brain regions respond differentially to the two word classes. However, the semantic-lexical properties of verbs and nouns that drive these effects remain unknown. Here we show that the most likely candidate is predication: a core lexical feature involved in binding constituent arguments (boy, candies) into a unified syntactic-semantic structure expressing a proposition (the boy likes the candies). We used functional neuroimaging to test whether the intrinsic "predication-building" function of verbs is what drives the verb-noun distinction in the brain. We first identified verb-preferring regions with a localizer experiment including verbs and nouns. Then, we examined whether these regions are sensitive to transitivity-an index measuring its tendency to select for a direct object. Transitivity is a verb-specific property lying at the core of its predication function. Neural activity in the left posterior middle temporal and inferior frontal gyri correlates with transitivity, indicating sensitivity to predication. This represents the first evidence that grammatical class preference in the brain is driven by a word's function to build predication structures.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 02/2014; · 4.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Language processing engages large-scale functional networks in both hemispheres. Although it is widely accepted that left perisylvian regions have a key role in supporting complex grammatical compu-tations, patient data suggest that some aspects of grammatical processing could be supported bilaterally. We investigated the distribution and the nature of grammatical computations across language processing networks by comparing two types of combinatorial grammatical sequences—inflectionally complex words and minimal phrases—and contrasting them with grammatically simple words. Novel multivariate analy-ses revealed that they engage a coalition of separable subsystems: inflected forms triggered left-lateralized activation, dissociable into dorsal processes supporting morphophonological parsing and ventral, lexically driven morphosyntactic processes. In contrast, simple phrases activated a consistently bilateral pattern of temporal regions, overlapping with inflectional activations in L middle temporal gyrus. These data confirm the role of the left-lateralized frontotemporal network in supporting complex grammatical computations. Critically, they also point to the capacity of bilateral temporal regions to support simple, linear grammati-cal computations. This is consistent with a dual neurobiological framework where phylogenetically older bihemispheric systems form part of the network that supports language function in the modern human, and where significant capacities for language comprehension remain intact even following severe left hemisphere damage. Hum Brain Mapp 00:000–000, 2014. V C 2014 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 11/2014; · 6.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJETIVO: Este estudo buscou analisar quantitativamente o uso do tempo (presente, passado ou futuro), modo (indicativo, subjuntivo ou imperativo), número (singular ou plural) e pessoa (1ª, 2ª ou 3ª) dos verbos enunciados em situação de fala espontânea por pré-escolares falantes do Português Brasileiro, na cidade de São Paulo, em desenvolvimento normal de linguagem. MÉTODOS: Coleta de amostras de fala de 60 pré-escolares divididos em três grupos pareados por gênero e faixa etária: GI (entre 2:0 e 2:11 anos), GII (entre 3:0 e 3:11 anos) e GIII (entre 4:0 e 4:11 anos). RESULTADOS: A análise intragrupos demonstrou haver predominância do modo indicativo, do tempo presente, do número singular e da 3ª pessoa. A análise intergrupos indicou que o uso do modo indicativo é crescente, enquanto o imperativo é decrescente e o subjuntivo quase não ocorreu nesta amostra. O tempo presente não difere entre os grupos enquanto o passado e o futuro aumentam. Quanto ao número, o singular predomina, mas tanto singular como plural aumentam. Finalmente, a 3ª pessoa predominou, a 2ª decresceu e a 1ª cresceu de GI para GIII. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados demonstraram que os pré-escolares estudados aprimoraram o emprego da morfologia verbal ao longo de seu desenvolvimento, exibindo uma evolução gradual no domínio dos aspectos analisados. Por fim, não foram encontradas diferenças significantes na comparação dos gêneros.
    Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 12/2008; 14(4):470-475.

Full-text

Download
1 Download
Available from