Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Complex I (NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase) from Escherichia coli and Comparison to the Enzyme from Mitochondria †

Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0XY, United Kingdom.
Biochemistry (Impact Factor: 3.19). 04/2008; 47(12):3964-71. DOI: 10.1021/bi702243b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The generation of reactive oxygen species by mitochondrial complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) is considered a significant cause of cellular oxidative stress, linked to neuromuscular diseases and aging. Defining its mechanism is important for the formulation of causative connections between complex I defects and pathological effects. Oxygen is probably reduced at two sites in complex I, one associated with NADH oxidation in the mitochondrial matrix and the other associated with ubiquinone reduction in the membrane. Here, we study complex I from Escherichia coli, exploiting similarities and differences in the bacterial and mitochondrial enzymes to extend our knowledge of O2 reduction at the active site for NADH oxidation. E. coli and bovine complex I reduce O2 at essentially the same rate, with the same potential dependence (set by the NAD (+)/NADH ratio), showing that the rate-determining step is conserved. The potential dependent rate of H2O2 production does not correlate to the potential of the distal [2Fe-2S] cluster N1a in E. coli complex I, excluding it as the point of O2 reduction. Therefore, our results confirm previous proposals that O2 reacts with the fully reduced flavin mononucleotide. Assays for superoxide production by E. coli complex I were prone to artifacts, but dihydroethidium reduction showed that, upon reducing O2, it produces approximately 20% superoxide and 80% H2O2. In contrast, bovine complex I produces 95% superoxide. The results are consistent with (but do not prove) a specific role for cluster N1a in determining the outcome of O2 reduction; possible reaction mechanisms are discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: Martin Stephen King, Dec 19, 2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In Chlamydomonas, unlike in flowering plants, genes coding for Nd7 (NAD7/49kDa) and Nd9 (NAD9/30kDa) core subunits of mitochondrial respiratory-chain complex I are nucleus-encoded. Both genes possess all the features that facilitate their expression and proper import of the polypeptides in mitochondria. By inactivating their expression by RNA interference or insertional mutagenesis, we show that both subunits are required for complex I assembly and activity. Inactivation of complex I impairs the cell growth rate, reduces the respiratory rate, leads to lower intracellular ROS production and lower expression of ROS scavenging enzymes, and is associated to a diminished capacity to concentrate CO2 without compromising photosynthetic capacity.
    Mitochondrion 12/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.mito.2013.11.004 · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by respiratory Complex I from Escherichia coli was studied in bacterial membrane fragments and in the isolated and purified enzyme, either solubilized or incorporated in proteoliposomes. We found that the replacement of a single amino acid residue in close proximity to the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-binding catalytic site (E95 in the NuoF subunit) dramatically increases the reactivity of Complex I towards dioxygen (O2 ). In the E95Q variant short-chain ubiquinones exhibit strong artificial one-electron reduction at the catalytic site, also leading to a stronger increase in ROS production. Two mechanisms can contribute to the observed kinetic effects: (a) a change in the reactivity of flavin mononucleotide (FMN) towards dioxygen at the catalytic site, and (b) a change in the population of the ROS-generating state. We propose the existence of two (closed and open) states of the NAD(+) -bound enzyme as one feature of the substrate-binding site of Complex I. The analysis of the kinetic model of ROS production allowed us to propose that the population of Complex I with reduced FMN is always low in the wild-type enzyme even at low ambient redox potentials, minimizing the rate of reaction with O2 in contrast to E95Q variant.
    Molecular Microbiology 12/2013; 90(6):1190-200. DOI:10.1111/mmi.12424 · 5.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of hypoxia preconditioning (HPC) on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and optimize novel non-invasive methods to assess the effect of biological interventions aimed to increased cell survival. MSCs from rat femur, with or without HPC, were exposed to hypoxic conditions in cell culture (1% O(2) for 24h) and cell survival (by the LDH release assay and Annexin-V staining) was measured. Oxidant status (conversion of dichloro-fluorescein-DCF- and dihydro-ethidium-DHE-, protein expression of oxidant enzymes) was characterized, together with the mobility pattern of cells under stress. Furthermore, cell survival was assessed non-invasively using state-of-the-art molecular imaging. Compared to controls, Hypoxia resulted in increased expression of the oxidative stress enzyme NAD(P)H oxidase (subunit 67(phox): 0.05 ± 0.01AU and 0.48 ± 0.02AU, respectively, p<0.05) and in the amount of ROS (DCF: 13 ±1 and 42 ± 3 RFU/μg protein, respectively, p<0.05) which led to a decrease in stem cell viability. Hypoxia preconditioning preserved cell biology, as evidenced by preservation of oxidant status (16 ± 1 RFU/μg protein, p<0.05 vs. hypoxia), and cell viability. Most importantly, the beneficial effect of HPC can be assessed non-invasively using molecular imaging. HPC preserves cell viability and function, in part through preservation of oxidant status, and its effects can be assessed using state-of-the-art molecular imaging. Understanding of the mechanisms underlying the fate of stem cells will be critical for the advancement of the field of stem cell therapy.
    Life sciences 11/2010; 88(1-2):65-73. DOI:10.1016/j.lfs.2010.10.023 · 2.30 Impact Factor