Bactofection of lung epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo using a genetically modified Escherichia coli

Department of Gene Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Gene therapy (Impact Factor: 3.1). 04/2008; 15(6):434-42. DOI: 10.1038/
Source: PubMed


Bacteria-mediated gene transfer ('bactofection') has emerged as an alternative approach for genetic vaccination and gene therapy. Here, we assessed bactofection of airway epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo using an attenuated Escherichia coli genetically engineered to invade non-phagocytic cells. Invasive E. coli expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of a prokaryotic promoter was efficiently taken up into the cytoplasm of cystic fibrosis tracheal epithelial (CFTE29o-) cells and led to dose-related reporter gene expression. In vivo experiments showed that following nasal instillation the vast majority of GFP-positive bacteria pooled in the alveoli. Further, bactofection was assessed in vivo. Mice receiving 5 x 10(8) E. coli carrying pCIKLux, in which luciferase (lux) expression is under control of the eukaryotic cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, showed a significant increase (P<0.01) in lux activity in lung homogenates compared to untransfected mice. Surprisingly, similar level of lux activity was observed for the non-invasive control strain indicating that the eukaryotic CMV promoter might be active in E. coli. Insertion of prokaryotic transcription termination sequences into pCIKLux significantly reduced prokaryotic expression from the CMV promoter allowing bactofection to be detected in vitro and in vivo. However, bacteria-mediated gene transfer leads to a significantly lower lux expression than cationic lipid GL67-mediated gene transfer. In conclusion, although proof-of-principle for lung bactofection has been demonstrated, levels were low and further modification to the bacterial vector, vector administration and the plasmids will be required.

Download full-text


Available from: Dieter C Gruenert, Jun 04, 2014
29 Reads
  • Source
    • "Recombinant invasive E. coli have been used to deliver therapeutically relevant molecules to mouse and human professional and non-professional phagocytic cells [38,66-70]. To date, use of recombinant E. coli as vectors has mainly been for delivering DNA for genetic vaccination. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is no safe, effective human vaccine against brucellosis. Live attenuated Brucella strains are widely used to vaccinate animals. However these live Brucella vaccines can cause disease and are unsafe for humans. Killed Brucella or subunit vaccines are not effective in eliciting long term protection. In this study, we evaluate an approach using a live, non-pathogenic bacteria (E. coli) genetically engineered to mimic the brucellae pathway of infection and present antigens for an appropriate cytolitic T cell response. E. coli was modified to express invasin of Yersinia and listerialysin O (LLO) of Listeria to impart the necessary infectivity and antigen releasing traits of the intracellular pathogen, Brucella. This modified E. coli was considered our vaccine delivery system and was engineered to express Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) or Brucella antigens for in vitro and in vivo immunological studies including cytokine profiling and cytotoxicity assays. The E. coli vaccine vector was able to infect all cells tested and efficiently deliver therapeutics to the host cell. Using GFP as antigen, we demonstrate that the E. coli vaccine vector elicits a Th1 cytokine profile in both primary and secondary immune responses. Additionally, using this vector to deliver a Brucella antigen, we demonstrate the ability of the E. coli vaccine vector to induce specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs). Protection against most intracellular bacterial pathogens can be obtained mostly through cell mediated immunity. Data presented here suggest modified E. coli can be used as a vaccine vector for delivery of antigens and therapeutics mimicking the infection of the pathogen and inducing cell mediated immunity to that pathogen.
    Journal of Immune Based Therapies and Vaccines 02/2009; 7(1):1. DOI:10.1186/1476-8518-7-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improving the means of drug delivery has become an important field of pharmaceutical research. The development of safe and advanced vectors for gene therapy and other novel therapies will allow for targeted delivery of pharmaceutically active agents and carries promise to improve therapies both through increased efficiency (e.g. improved cellular uptake of the active drug) as well as lower toxicity (e.g. through targeted delivery only to the cells requiring treatment) for a large number of pharmaceutical agents. Here we are reviewing the nascent field using live bacteria as vectors for therapeutic and preventive agents in a wide range of areas, from vaccine purposes to gene therapy and delivery of therapeutic RNA interference. This review focuses particularly on the use of E. coli derived strains for therapeutic delivery.
    Current Gene Therapy 02/2009; 10(1):27-33. DOI:10.2174/156652310790945593 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene therapy covers a broad spectrum of applications, from gene replacement and knockdown for genetic or acquired diseases such as cancer, to vaccination, each with different requirements for gene delivery. Viral vectors and synthetic liposomes have emerged as the vehicles of choice for many applications today, but both have limitations and risks, including complexity of production, limited packaging capacity, and unfavorable immunological features, which restrict gene therapy applications and hold back the potential for preventive gene therapy. While continuing to improve these vectors, it is important to investigate other options, particularly nonviral biological agents which include bacteria, bacteriophage, virus-like particles (VLPs), erythrocyte ghosts, and exosomes. Exploiting the natural properties of these biological entities for specific gene delivery applications will expand the repertoire of gene therapy vectors available for clinical use. Here, we review the prospects for nonviral biological delivery vehicles as gene therapy agents with focus on their unique evolved biological properties and respective limitations and potential applications. The potential of these nonviral biological entities to act as clinical gene therapy delivery vehicles has already been shown in clinical trials using bacteria-mediated gene transfer and with sufficient development, these entities will complement the established delivery techniques for gene therapy applications.
    Molecular Therapy 04/2009; 17(5):767-77. DOI:10.1038/mt.2009.41 · 6.23 Impact Factor
Show more