Superoxidase dismutase (SOD) topical use in oncologic patients: treatment of acute cutaneous toxicity secondary to radiotherapy.

Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Clinical and Translational Oncology (Impact Factor: 1.6). 04/2008; 10(3):163-7. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-008-0174-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of SOD applied topically in oncologic patients affected by acute radiodermatitis.
This study includes 57 patients who showed a dermatitis grade 2 or superior; they were administered SOD ointment b.i.d. (40 mg, weekly) and follow-up continued for 12 weeks.
At the end of radiotherapy, 77.1% of the patients ameliorated completely or partially, and at the end of the 12-week period 100% of patients were free of toxicity. No acute toxicity relapses were reported. Response time reduced during radiotherapy, as well as the treatment time at the end of it.
The employment of SOD topically is efficient in the treatment of radiodermatitis, which is an acute side effect of radiotherapy.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The application of enzyme technologies to industrial research, development, and manufacturing has become a very important field. Since the production of crude rennet in 1874, several enzymes have been commercialized, and used for therapeutic, supplementary, and other applications. Recent advancements in biotechnology now allow companies to produce safer and less expensive enzymes with enhanced potency and specificity. Antioxidant enzymes are emerging as a new addition to the pool of industrial enzymes and are surpassing all other enzymes in terms of the volume of research and production. In the 1990s, an antioxidant enzyme--superoxide dismutase (SOD)--was introduced into the market. Although the enzyme initially showed great promise in therapeutic applications, it did not perform up to expectations. Consequently, its use was limited to non-drug applications in humans and drug applications in animals. This review summarizes the rise and fall of SOD at the industrial level, the reasons for this, and potential future thrust areas that need to be addressed. The review also focuses on other industrially relevant aspects of SOD such as industrial importance, enzyme engineering, production processes, and process optimization and scale-up.
    Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 10/2010; 31(1):65-76. · 7.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyes have a long history and constitute an important component in our daily lives. The dye industry began by using natural plant and insect sources, and then rapidly turned to synthetic manufacturing processes. Unfortunately, several of the synthetic dyes, especially azo dyes, have been found to be toxic and mutagenic, and are banned throughout the world. However, because of their low cost and other desirable properties, the use and manufacture of azo dyes continues even today. Removal and treatment of azo dyes from wastewater presents a very special challenge. Since azo dyes are recalcitrant to the conventional aerobic biological treatment, and physical/chemical treatment processes are neither ecofriendly nor economical, innovative remediation approaches need to be explored. In the current scenario, a combination of biological and advanced oxidation processes seem to be the most desired solution. Moreover, mechanistic studies of the pathways and enzymes involved in dye degradation and detoxification need to be undertaken for process optimization. This paper critically and comprehensively reviews recent research advances and the knowledge-base of the previously mentioned areas, including history and chemistry of dyes, mechanistic studies on their persistence, ecotoxicity, and carcinogenicity, and potential remediation methods. Particular emphasis has been given towards critical evaluation of the existing dye wastewater treatment methods and their full-scale applications; based on which recommendations have been made for future developments of the treatment technologies and their assessment methods. In the Authors' opinion, a more holistic and large-scale approach is required to tackle the chronic problem of dye pollution.
    Environmental Reviews 01/2011; 19:350-370. · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solar energy has a number of short- and long-term detrimental effects on skin that can result in several skin disorders. The aim of this review is to summarise current knowledge on endogenous systems within the skin for protection from solar radiation and present research findings to date, on the exogenous options for such skin photoprotection. Endogenous systems for protection from solar radiation include melanin synthesis, epidermal thickening and an antioxidant network. Existing lesions are eliminated via repair mechanisms. Cells with irreparable damage undergo apoptosis. Excessive and chronic sun exposure however can overwhelm these mechanisms leading to photoaging and the development of cutaneous malignancies. Therefore exogenous means are a necessity. Exogenous protection includes sun avoidance, use of photoprotective clothing and sufficient application of broad-spectrum sunscreens as presently the best way to protect the skin. However other strategies that may enhance currently used means of protection are being investigated. These are often based on the endogenous protective response to solar light such as compounds that stimulate pigmentation, antioxidant enzymes, DNA repair enzymes, non-enzymatic antioxidants. More research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of new alternatives to photoprotection such as use of DNA repair and antioxidant enzymes and plant polyphenols and to find an efficient way for their delivery to the skin. New approaches to the prevention of skin damage are important especially for specific groups of people such as (young) children, photosensitive people and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Changes in public awareness on the subject too must be made.
    International Journal of Radiation Biology 12/2010; 86(12):999-1030. · 1.84 Impact Factor