Article

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Human Nutrition Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.92). 04/2008; 87(3):627-37.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Inconsistent findings from observational studies have prolonged the controversy over the effects of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) on the risk of certain chronic diseases.
The objective was to evaluate the association between GI, GL, and chronic disease risk with the use of meta-analysis techniques.
A systematic review of published reports identified a total of 37 prospective cohort studies of GI and GL and chronic disease risk. Studies were stratified further according to the validity of the tools used to assess dietary intake. Rate ratios (RRs) were estimated in a Cox proportional hazards model and combined by using a random-effects model.
From 4 to 20 y of follow-up across studies, a total of 40 129 incident cases were identified. For the comparison between the highest and lowest quantiles of GI and GL, significant positive associations were found in fully adjusted models of validated studies for type 2 diabetes (GI RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.59; GL RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.45), coronary heart disease (GI RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.56), gallbladder disease (GI RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.40; GL RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.60), breast cancer (GI RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.16), and all diseases combined (GI RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.19; GL RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.15).
Low-GI and/or low-GL diets are independently associated with a reduced risk of certain chronic diseases. In diabetes and heart disease, the protection is comparable with that seen for whole grain and high fiber intakes. The findings support the hypothesis that higher postprandial glycemia is a universal mechanism for disease progression.

0 Followers
 · 
157 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Examine the effect of experimental sleep restriction (SR) on adolescents' subjective hunger and perceived appeal of sweet/dessert foods versus other foods. A secondary goal was to replicate previous findings on the effects of SR on dietary intake. Randomized cross-over sleep restriction-extension paradigm. Sleep was obtained and monitored at home. Outcome measures were gathered during office visits. 31 typically-developing adolescents aged 14-17 years. The three-week protocol consisted of a baseline week, followed randomly by five consecutive nights of SR (6.5 hours in bed) versus healthy sleep duration (HS; 10 hours in bed), a 2-night wash-out period, and a 5-night cross-over. Sleep was monitored via actigraphy. The morning after each experimental condition, teens rated their hunger, underwent a 24-hour diet recall interview, and rated the appeal of a series of pictures of sweet/dessert foods (e.g., ice cream, candy) and non-sweets (meat, eggs, fruits, vegetables). Teens rated pictures of sweet/dessert foods to be more appealing after SR than after HS (Cohen's d = .41, t = 2.07, p = .045). The sleep manipulation did not affect self-reported hunger or the appeal of non-sweet foods (p >.10). Consistent with our prior work, intake of overall calories was 11% higher and consumption of sweet/dessert servings was 52% greater during SR than HS. Adolescent SR appears to increase the subjective appeal of sweet/dessert foods, indicating a potential mechanism by which SR might contribute to weight gain and the risk for obesity and chronic illness.
    PLoS ONE 02/2015; 10(2):e0115434. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115434 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes in insulin sensitivity (IS) and insulin secretion occur with perturbations in energy balance and glycemic load (GL) of the diet that may precede the development of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Determinants of changes in IS and insulin secretion with weight cycling in non-obese healthy subjects remain unclear. In a 6wk controlled 2-stage randomized dietary intervention 32 healthy men (26±4y, BMI: 24±2kg/m2) followed 1wk of overfeeding (OF), 3wks of caloric restriction (CR) containing either 50% or 65% carbohydrate (CHO) and 2wks of refeeding (RF) with the same amount of CHO but either low or high glycaemic index at ±50% energy requirement. Measures of IS (basal: HOMA-index, postprandial: Matsuda-ISI), insulin secretion (early: Stumvoll-index, total: tAUC-insulin/tAUC-glucose) and potential endocrine determinants (ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, thyroid hormone levels, 24h-urinary catecholamine excretion) were assessed. IS improved and insulin secretion decreased due to CR and normalized upon RF. Weight loss-induced improvements in basal and postprandial IS were associated with decreases in leptin and increases in ghrelin levels, respectively (r = 0.36 and r = 0.62, p<0.05). Weight regain-induced decrease in postprandial IS correlated with increases in adiponectin, fT3, TSH, GL of the diet and a decrease in ghrelin levels (r-values between -0.40 and 0.83, p<0.05) whereas increases in early and total insulin secretion were associated with a decrease in leptin/adiponectin-ratio (r = -0.52 and r = -0.46, p<0.05) and a decrease in fT4 (r = -0.38, p<0.05 for total insulin secretion only). After controlling for GL associations between RF-induced decrease in postprandial IS and increases in fT3 and TSH levels were no longer significant. Weight cycling induced changes in IS and insulin secretion were associated with changes in all measured hormones, except for catecholamine excretion. While leptin, adiponectin and ghrelin seem to be the major endocrine determinants of IS, leptin/adiponectin-ratio and fT4 levels may impact changes in insulin secretion with weight cycling. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01737034.
    PLoS ONE 02/2015; 10(2):e0117865. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117865 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: To compare the cumulative (three-day) effect of prolonged sitting on metabolic responses during a mixed meal tolerance test (MTT), with sitting that is regularly interrupted with brief bouts of light-intensity walking. Research design and methods: Overweight/obese adults (n=19) were recruited for a randomized, three-day, outpatient, crossover trial involving: 1) 7-hour days of uninterrupted sitting (SIT); and, 2) 7-hour days of sitting with light-intensity activity breaks [BREAKS; 2-minutes of treadmill walking (3.2 km/hour) every 20 minutes (total: 17 breaks/day)]. On days 1 and 3, participants underwent a MTT (75g carbohydrate, 50g fat), and the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was calculated from hourly blood samples. GEE models were adjusted for gender, BMI, energy intake, treatment order and pre-prandial values to determine effects of time, condition and time x condition. Results: The glucose iAUC was 1.3 ± 0.5 and 1.5 ± 0.5 mmol.hr.L-1 (mean difference ± SEM) higher in SIT compared with BREAKS on days 1 and 3 respectively (condition effect: P=0.001), with no effect of time (P=0.48) or time x condition (P=0.8). The insulin iAUC was also higher on both days in SIT (Day 1: ∆151 ± 73, Day 3: ∆91 ± 73 pmol.hr.L-1, P=0.01), with no effect of time (P=0.52) or time x condition (P=0.71). There was no between-treatment difference in triglycerides iAUC. Conclusion: There were significant between-condition effects but no temporal change in metabolic responses to MTT, indicating that breaking up sitting over three days sustains, but does not enhance, the lowering of postprandial glucose and insulin.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
90 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014