Patients with head and neck cancers and associated postirradiated carotid blowout syndrome: endovascular therapeutic methods and outcomes.

Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Journal of Vascular Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.98). 05/2008; 47(5):936-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.030
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study retrospectively evaluated the technical and hemostatic outcomes of reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular management in patients with head and neck cancers associated with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS).
Twenty-four patients with head and neck cancers with CBS involving the main trunk of carotid artery underwent endovascular therapy. This included reconstructive management with self-expandable stent grafts to preserve the diseased carotid artery in 11 patients and deconstructive management with balloons, coils, or acrylic adhesives to occlude the diseased carotid artery in 13 patients. Based on clinical severity and therapeutic priority, we classified CBS in our patients into two groups: acute or impending and threatened. The angiographic severity was graded from 0 to 3. Evaluation of technical outcome included technical success, initial and delayed complications, and patency of stent graft in the reconstructive group. The hemostatic outcome was evaluated by immediate hemostatic result, rebleeding, and duration of hemostasis. Sex, age, clinical and angiographic severities, local wound complications, and location of the pathologic lesion were examined as predictors of the technical and hemostatic outcomes of endovascular management by using Cox regression method.
Technical success and immediate hemostasis were achieved in all patients of both groups. Initial complications during the procedures were encountered in four patients (36.4%) who underwent reconstructive management and in one patient (7.7%) who underwent deconstructive management (P = .142). Delayed complications during the follow-up were seen in one patient (9.1%) with reconstructive management and one patient (7.7%) with deconstructive management (P > .99). Rebleeding occurred in five patients (45.5%) in the reconstructive management group and in three patients (23.1%) in the deconstructive management group (P = .659). The mean duration of hemostasis after initial reconstructive and deconstructive management was 4.0 +/- 8.1 and 8.5 +/- 10.1 months, respectively (P = .249). Rebleeding was noted in 7 of 11 patients (63.6%) with acute CBS and in 1 of 13 patients (7.7%) with impending and threatened CBS (P = .008).
There is no significant difference in technical and hemostatic outcomes between the reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular management methods. Hemostatic results were influenced by clinical severity. The rebleeding rate is higher in patients with advanced and acute clinical severity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In high-risk head and neck cases treated with tumor resection and associated radical neck dissection, orocutaneous fistulas and wound breakdowns in the neck are relatively frequent and can have serious consequences, such as carotid blowout syndrome (CBS), the need for salvage reoperations, and prolonged recovery time. The authors present the application of a prophylactic chimeric anterolateral thigh (ALT) and vastus lateralis (VL) flap to prevent complications. A retrospective review was performed of a historical group (96 patients) of patients with head and neck cancer treated with tumor resection, radical neck dissection, and microsurgical reconstruction of the tumor site only and a prospective cohort (21 patients) in which a chimeric ALT-VL flap was used to simultaneously reconstruct the tumor site and sternocleidomastoid muscle to fill dead space and protect the carotid artery. The rate of complications was higher in the historical group: CBS occurred in 4.1% and orocutaneous fistulas in 11.5% of patients; 5.2% of patients required major salvage surgery for a wound complication. In the cohort group, no CBS or orocutaneous fistula occurred and no major salvage surgical procedure was needed. Prophylactic ALT-VL flaps in high-risk head and neck cancers provide adequate and long-lasting soft tissue coverage for the carotid artery, with minimal additional morbidity, and could be beneficial in preventing serious and life-threatening wound complications and the need for reoperation.
    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 11/2013; · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Contemporary Oncology / Wspólczesna Onkologia 01/2014; 18(5):371-376. · 0.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Carotid blowout syndrome is a rare but devastating complication in patients with head and neck malignancy, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Bleeding from the carotid artery or its branches is a well-recognized complication following treatment or recurrence of head and neck cancer. It is an emergency situation, and the classical approach to save the patient's life is to ligate the carotid artery. But the surgical treatment is often technically difficult. Endovascular therapies were recently reported as good alternatives to surgical ligation. Retrospective review of three cases of acute or threatened carotid hemorrhage managed by endovascular therapies. Two patients presented with acute carotid blowout, and one patient with a sentinel bleed. Two patients had previously been treated with surgery and chemo radiation. One patient was treated by chemo radiation. Two had developed pharyngocutaneous fistulas, and one had an open necrosis filled wound that surrounded the carotid artery. In two patients, stent placement resolved the acute hemorrhage. In one patient, superselective embolization was done. Mean duration follow-up was 10.2 months. No patient had residual sequelae of stenting or embolization. Management of carotid blow syndrome is very critical and difficult. A multidisciplinary approach is very important in the management of carotid blow syndrome. Correct and suitable management can be life saving. An endovascular technique is a good and effective alternative with much lower morbidity rates than surgical repair or ligation.
    Journal des Maladies Vasculaires 11/2013; · 0.24 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014