Article

Geographic variation and risk of skin cancer in US women - Differences between melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 04/2008; 168(5):501-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.5.501
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Occurrences of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have been associated with varying geography. Our goal was to evaluate differences in risk of these skin cancers according to residence at varying UV indices at 3 time points.
Prospective 1984-2002 study of 84 836 female nurses who lived in different UV index regions of the United States at birth and at 15 or 30 years of age. The outcome measure was diagnosis of melanoma, SCC, or BCC.
During the 18-year study, 420 cases of melanoma, 863 cases of SCC, and 8215 cases of BCC occurred. At 30 years of age, age-adjusted risks for SCC were 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.76) and 1.90 (95% CI, 1.51-2.36) for women residing in states with a UV index of 6 (medium) and 7 or more (high), respectively. Although elevated, the age-adjusted risk of BCC at 30 years of age associated with residence in these states was substantially less. Although the risk of melanoma was not elevated for women living in these states at 30 years of age, it was significantly elevated among women living in states with UV indices of 6 at birth and at 15 years of age. There was no material change in risk estimates with multivariate adjustment. For women who reported living in states with UV indices of 7 or more at all 3 time points, the multivariate risk of SCC was highest.
The risk of SCC is independently affected by residence in locations with medium and high UV indices; the gradient of risk is weaker for BCC; and the risk of melanoma does not change significantly across this gradient.

Full-text

Available from: Graham A Colditz, Dec 07, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
73 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First-degree relatives of melanoma survivors have a substantially higher lifetime risk for melanoma than individuals with no family history. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the primary modifiable risk factor for the disease. Reducing UV exposure through sun protection may be particularly important for children with a parental history of melanoma. Nonetheless, limited prior research has investigated sun protection practices and sun exposure among these children. The California Cancer Registry was used to identify melanoma survivors eligible to participate in a survey to assess their children's sun protection practices and sun exposure. The survey was administered by mail, telephone, or web to Latino and non-Latino white melanoma survivors with at least one child (0-17 years; N = 324). Sun exposure was high and the rate of sunburn was equivalent to or higher than estimates from average-risk populations. Use of sun protection was suboptimal. Latino children were less likely to wear sunscreen and hats and more likely to wear sunglasses, although these differences disappeared in adjusted analyses. Increasing age of the child was associated with lower sun protection and higher risk for sunburn, whereas higher objective risk for melanoma predicted improved sun protection and a higher risk for sunburns. Perception of high barriers to sun protection was the strongest modifiable correlate of sun protection. Interventions to improve sun protection and reduce sun exposure and sunburns in high-risk children are needed. Intervening in high-risk populations may help reduce the burden of melanoma in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 169-77. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
    Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 01/2015; 24(1):169-77. DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0650 · 4.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:There are limited data on the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and melanoma skin cancer (MSC) among thiopurine-treated patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Our aim was to investigate the risk while on, by cumulative years, and after stopping thiopurine therapy.METHODS:Nationwide data were obtained from the Veterans Affairs (VA) health-care system during 2001-2011. We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with UC. Cox regression was used to investigate the association between thiopurines use and time to NMSC while adjusting for demographics, ultraviolet radiation exposure, and VA visiting frequency. A matched nested case-control study was conducted to investigate the association between thiopurine use and MSC.RESULTS:We included 14,527 patients with UC in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 8.1 years. A total of 3,346 (23%) patients used thiopurines for a median duration of 1.6 years. We identified 421 NMSC and 45 MSC cases. The adjusted hazard ratios of developing NMSC while on and after stopping thiopurines were 2.1 (P<0.0001) and 0.7 (P=0.07), respectively, as compared with unexposed patients. The incidence rate of NMSC among those who never used thiopurines was 3.7 compared with 5.8, 7.9, 8.3, 7.8, and 13.6 per 1,000 person-years for the 1st, 2nd, 3th, 4th, and 5th year of thiopurine use, respectively. No statistically significant association was observed between thiopurine use and MSC, odds ratio 0.8 (P=0.6).CONCLUSIONS:In this predominantly white male nationwide cohort, there was a twofold increase in the risk of NMSC while on thiopurines. The incidence rate of NMSC significantly increased with subsequent years of cumulative exposure to thiopurines. Stopping thiopurines reduced the risk of NMSC to pre-exposure levels irrespective of the prior exposure duration.Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 23 September 2014; doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.298.
    The American Journal of Gastroenterology 09/2014; 109(11). DOI:10.1038/ajg.2014.298 · 9.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Previous studies suggest that solar UV exposure in early life is predictive of cutaneous melanoma risk in adulthood, whereas the relation of BRAF mutation with sun exposure and disease prognosis has been less certain. We investigated the associations between BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61R mutations and known risk factors, clinicopath-ologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of melanoma in a case series of primary invasive cutaneous melanoma from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS). Methods Somatic BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61R mutations of 127 primary invasive melanomas from the NHS cohort were determined by pyrosequencing using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded block tissues. Logistic regression analyses were performed to detect the associations of mutations with melanoma risk factors, and Kaplan–Meier method was used to examine associations between mutations and survival. Results The odds ratios for harboring BRAF V600E mutations were 5.54 (95 % CI 1.19–25.8, p trend = 0.02) for women residing in states with UV index ≥7 versus those residing in states with UV index ≤5 at 30 years of age. Patients with BRAF V600E mutations tended to have shorter melanoma-specific survival when compared to patients with wild type at both loci (median survival time 110 vs. 159 months) (p = 0.03). No association was found between NRASQ61R mutation and melanoma risk factors or melanoma-specific survival. Conclusions BRAF V600E mutations in primary cutaneous melanomas were associated with residence in locations with medium and high UV indices in mid-life. BRAF V600E may be associated with an unfavorable prognosis among melanoma patients.
    Cancer Causes and Control 07/2014; 25(10). DOI:10.1007/s10552-014-0443-x · 2.96 Impact Factor