Use of collagen-sealing device in hepatic resection: a comparative analysis to standard resection technique

Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
HPB (Impact Factor: 2.68). 02/2006; 8(3):194-9. DOI: 10.1080/13651820600593087
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Blood transfusion has been reported as an independent risk factor for poor outcome after liver resection in spite of its well known benefits. Refinements in parenchymal dissection have been pursued to reduce blood loss and transfusion. A collagen-sealing device (CSD) has recently been touted as an alternative technique that aids in blood conservation. We report the results of our initial series of patients undergoing a CSD-assisted resection and present a historical comparison.
Consecutive patients who were undergoing liver resection at a single tertiary cancer centre were enrolled in this study. The Ligasure Atlas device (Valleylab Inc., Division of Tyco Healthcare) was used for parenchymal division in the CSD group. Known blood conservation techniques (i.e. low central venous pressure, ultrasonic dissection, Pringle clamp) were standardized in both groups. Clinical and outcome variables including operative time, estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements were collected. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 8.2e.
In all, 28 consecutive patients underwent CSD-assisted hepatic resection between October 2003 and September 2004. The control group included 188 patients treated between January 1991 and September 2003. In the CSD group, we observed a reduction in mean estimated blood loss (930 vs 1450 ml, p=0.002) and mean transfusion requirements (0.46 vs 1.19 units, p=0.002). There was no increase in operative time with the new instrument (326 vs 363 min, p=0.167).
Use of a CSD has the potential to further reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements without increasing operative time.

9 Reads
  • Source
    • "It has been available since October 2007 and is designed for open procedures. It has been used for dissection in surgery of the liver, gallbladder, thyroid and breast [13-18]. It has been used in other lymphatic dissections in an attempt to reduce lymphatically related complications and has been shown to reduce operative times and reduce lymphatic spillage with similar rates of lymph node harvest for both modified lateral neck dissections and central neck dissections in thyroid cancer[16,17]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For patients with axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer, performance of a complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard approach. Due to the rich lymphatic network in the axilla, it is necessary to carefully dissect and identify all lymphatic channels. Traditionally, these lymphatics are sealed with titanium clips or individually sutured. Recently, the Harmonic Focus®, a hand-held ultrasonic dissector, allows lymphatics to be sealed without the utilization of clips or ties. We hypothesize that ALND performed with the Harmonic Focus® will decrease operative time and reduce post-operative complications. Retrospective review identified all patients who underwent ALND at a teaching hospital between January of 2005 and December of 2009. Patient demographics, presenting pathology, treatment course, operative time, days to drain removal, and surgical complications were recorded. Comparisons were made to a selected control group of patients who underwent similar surgical procedures along with an ALND performed utilizing hemostatic clips and electrocautery. A total of 41 patients were included in this study. Operative time was not improved with the use of ultrasonic dissection, however, there was a decrease in the total number of days that closed suction drainage was required, although this was not statistically significant. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. In this case-matched retrospective review, there were fewer required days of closed suction drainage when ALND was performed with ultrasonic dissection versus clips and electrocautery.
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology 08/2011; 9(1):90. DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-9-90 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different surgical transection methods have been used for distal pancreatectomy (DP), but none of them has yet achieved perfect results. This study compares 2 standard transection techniques with the alternative LigaSure technique. Forty-eight pigs underwent a DP. Sixteen animals were operated on with a scalpel followed by hand suturing. Sixteen pigs received a DP using an Endo GIA, and the pancreas of 16 pigs was transected with LigaSure. The transection surface of remnant pancreas was observed for liquid collection and abscess on postoperative day 7. Operating time on the day of DP was significantly different, with a shorter operating time in the stapler and LigaSure groups. The morbidity on postoperative day 7 was similar in all groups. In the present experimental animal study, LigaSure seems to be fast and safe as well as comparable with the standard transection and closure techniques in DP.
    Surgical Innovation 02/2011; 18(4):329-37. DOI:10.1177/1553350610395032 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreatic surgery requires extensive preparation and tissue dissection. Therefore, LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) provides an alternative to conventional dissection techniques. The aim of the present study was to describe the feasibility, safety, and cost efficiency of LigaSure in pancreatoduodenectomy. Seven patients underwent surgery with the Ligasure and 7 patients underwent surgery with conventional dissection techniques. The patients were investigated for surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, mortality, duration of hospital stay, and surgery-related costs. Surgical time was 207 minutes in the LigaSure group and 255 minutes in the conventional group (P = .020). Intraoperative blood loss was 271 and 771 mL, respectively (P = .010). Other perioperative outcomes were comparable. The respective surgery-related costs averaged €4,125 and €4,931 (P = .023). The use of LigaSure in pancreatoduodenectomy seems to be feasible and safe. In addition, it might lead to a reduction in the surgery-related costs.
    American journal of surgery 02/2011; 201(2):166-70. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.023 · 2.29 Impact Factor
Show more


9 Reads
Available from