Supervising Children During Parental Distractions

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, MLC 3015, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.91). 04/2008; 33(8):833-41. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn021
Source: PubMed


To examine the effects of parenting distractions on supervising behaviors in relation to child risky behaviors.
Forty preschool-aged children and their parents were randomly assigned to occupy a simulated home living room for 45 min with the parent involved in either (a) no planned distraction, (b) a telephone call distraction, (c) a TV show distraction, or (d) a computer assignment distraction. Parent and child behaviors were recorded and coded.
Parent supervising behaviors were significantly intercorrelated but revealed no relation to risky child behavior. Children showed higher risky behavior during parental distractions and steadily over time when parent distractions occurred. Additionally, younger children were more likely to engage in risky behavior when compared to older children.
Parents showed significant reductions in their ability to supervise children during distractions, limiting the ability to provide education or to take immediate action necessary to prevent or minimize possible injuries.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard E Boles, Jan 08, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A paucity of literature regarding strategies for injury prevention in children for mothers with substance abuse exists. Substance abuse propagates distractions such as inattention; therefore, these mothers should be targeted for injury prevention education. A quasi-experimental design compared the results of traditional classroom teaching with an innovative home hazard simulation activity to teach injury prevention to mothers recovering from substance abuse. Study results identified a need to employ multiple modalities when teaching injury prevention. Information obtained from this research suggests a need for continued study and adaptation of current teaching strategies for injury prevention education in other high-risk populations.
    Journal of Community Health Nursing 07/2013; 30(3):155-163. DOI:10.1080/07370016.2013.806720 · 0.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: (empirical) There is a paucity of research investigating multivariate factors in paediatric unintentional injury, yet uni- or bivariate risk factors do not suffice in explicating complex aetiological pathways. A first-phase pilot study was conducted to explore relations and structure of three toddler-variables proposed in a model of unintentional injury. The study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of measures and assess feasibility of methods. Forty-eight toddlers (15-26 months) comprised the sample, and were observed for 10 minutes in a playroom (a parent was present but facing away). The room was fit out with pseudo-risky items (e.g., plastic knife and fork, water-filled cleaning bottle) to mirror real-world environmental hazards. Parents completed questionnaires about child’s temperament and injury history prior to testing. Sound reliability and validity was found for the five observed Risky Behaviours (latency to engage with risky item; proximity to parent; visual-verbal interactions; innocuous engagement; hazardous engagement). Parent-report temperament and Injury Scores, derived from a novel, post-data collection rating scale for injury histories, revealed good internal consistency and convergent validity. Results revealed only one of five temperament factors (comprised of three traits: positive anticipation, low intensity pleasure, and sociability), was significant, revealing an interaction with toddler’s sex to produce differential risk of unintentional injury in girls and boys. It is concluded that multivariate investigations reveal important interactions that cannot be intuitively or statistically discerned through single or dual variables alone.
    11/2013, Degree: fourth year psychology, Supervisor: Dr Merrilyn Hooley
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To explore maternal perceptions of supervision and childhood unintentional injury in order to develop understanding and explanation for differences in unintentional injury rates between an advantaged and disadvantaged area. Background Unintentional injury is the second cause of mortality and a significant cause of morbidity in the zero to four year age group. Children living in socio-economic disadvantage are at a greater risk of unintentional injury than their more affluent counter-parts. Methods Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews; content data analysis was undertaken. Participants included 37 mothers with a child aged less than five years; 16 living in an area of disadvantage (and high rate of childhood unintentional injury) and 21 living in an advantaged area (and low rate of childhood unintentional injury). Findings Parents in both areas described the importance of parental supervision in reducing child unintentional injury risks. Parents in both areas used listening as a supervision strategy. Parents in both areas described how ‘when the child goes quiet’ that is a cue for them to make a visual check on the child. Listening was used more for boys than girls in both areas, but parents in the advantaged area used listening as a supervision strategy more frequently than those in the disadvantaged area. Parents described supervision strategies as being shaped by child character and age rather than child gender. Parents in both areas described similar strategies for managing distractions. An important difference was found with regard to older siblings; parents living in the advantaged area described older siblings as an injury risk to younger children. Parents in the disadvantaged area described older siblings as providing some supervision for younger children. Parents living in disadvantaged circumstances may face greater challenges with regard to supervision than parents living in advantaged circumstances and this may partly explain differences in injury risk.
    Primary Health Care Research & Development 05/2014; 16(04):1-10. DOI:10.1017/S1463423614000218
Show more