How Are Outcomes Affected by Combining the Pemberton and Salter Osteotomies?

MH Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Hospital for Research and Education, Istanbul, Turkey.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 05/2008; 466(4):837-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0153-3
Source: PubMed


The Pembersal operation combines features of the Pemberton and Salter osteotomies. Results have usually been reported in patients with dysplasia but without frank dislocation. We asked if the following factors influence the outcome of the Pembersal operation in patients with dislocated hips: triradiate cartilage damage causing early closure; the acetabular index improvement; and the age of the patient at time of operation. We assessed triradiate cartilage damage, a modified McKay clinical classification, acetabular index, center-edge angles, Reimers index, acetabular depth-to-width ratios, Severin classification and Tönnis grading of 33 patients (44 hips) have been evaluated in this retrospective study. The mean age at surgery was 5 years (range, 1.5-14 years). The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 10.5 years; range, 5-17 years). Preoperatively, three (7%) hips were Tönnis Grade 2, 10 (23%) were Grade 3, and 31 (70%) were Grade 4. Eight (18%) hips were Severin Class 1, 32 (73%) Class 2, and four (9%) were Class 3. According to McKay's criteria satisfactory results with a rate of 76% were obtained. Premature closure of the triradiate cartilage occurred in eight (18%) hips and postoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head in three (6%) hips. Satisfactory clinical and radiographic improvements in the aforementioned parameters can be obtained by Pembersal osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text


Available from: Aysegul Bursali, Aug 14, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJETIVO: Avaliar os resultados do tratamento cirúrgico da Displasia do Desenvolvimento do Quadril na idade da marcha. MÉTODOS: Avaliamos 33 quadris operados entre novembro de 1992 e setembro de 1997. A média de idade foi 4 anos e 5 meses na ocasião da cirurgia e 11 anos e 7 meses quando avaliamos os resultados. O seguimento médio foi de 10 anos e 2 meses. Realizamos o encurtamento femoral, redução cruenta e osteotomia pélvica (Salter ou Chiari). Radiograficamente avaliamos: grau da luxação, índice acetabular; ângulo acetabular; arco de Shenton; linha de Hilgenheiner; coeficientes c/b, c/h, centro-acetábulo e cabeça-acetábulo; largura da cartilagem trirradiada; relação cabeça trocânter; esfericidade da epífise femoral; ângulo de Wiberg; necrose avascular e anisomelia. Os parâmetros radiográficos foram avaliados nos períodos pré-operatório, pós-operatório imediato e tardio. RESULTADOS: Verificamos estatisticamente melhora significante destes no momento pré-operatório para o pós-operatório imediato (p=0,0001) porém não houve variação significante entre o pós-operatório imediato e o tardio (p=0.5958). CONCLUSÃO: Pela classificação utilizada para avaliação dos resultados observamos 23 (69,70%) bons, 5 (15,15%) regulares e 5 (15,15%) maus resultados.
    Acta Ortopédica Brasileira 12/2009; 18(4):218-223. · 0.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated the medium-term results of combined Chiari pelvic and femoral osteotomies performed at the Manchester Children's Hospitals between the years 1985 and 1994. The indications for these osteotomies were either hip dislocation or subluxation in children with neuromuscular disease. We clinically and radiologically evaluated 20 hips in 18 patients treated for hip subluxation and dislocation with Chiari osteotomy. The average post-operative clinical follow-up period was 11.32 years (range 10.1-12.9). The mean age at the time of surgery was 7.3 years (range 3.1-13.2 years). Clinically, 9 hips had a 'Good' outcome, 10 were "Fair" and 1 was "Poor" according to Osterkamp criteria. At last follow-up, radiologically the mean Sharp's angle improved from 51° to 44° (p = 0.09), the mean Centre-Edge angle improved from -16° to 18° (p = 0.067), the mean Migration Index improved from 59 to 29 % (p = 0.011), the mean femoral neck-shaft angle from 160° to 117° (p < 0.0001) and the Severin criteria improved from an average grade of 4.5-2.9 (p < 0.0001). Our results compared to previous studies confirm that combined femoral and Chiari osteotomies provide a favourable outcome both clinically and radiologically at least 10 years following surgery. Accepting that the numbers are small, we report no statistical difference in the mean age at the time of operation when comparing the children with an eventual 'good' outcome and those with an eventual 'fair' or 'poor' outcome.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 05/2012; 96(2):101-6. DOI:10.1007/s12306-012-0201-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Loss to follow-up weakens study results, but 100% patient return is typically unrealistic, especially in retrospective call-back studies. What follow-up rate should investigators strive to obtain? No articles evaluating this question could be found in a PubMed literature search. Thus, we proposed to identify an average rate of patient return in pediatric orthopaedic retrospective call-back studies. Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify pediatric orthopaedic retrospective call-back studies. The search was limited to orthopaedic journals, in which the titles and abstracts contained the key word, “retrospective.” The search also was limited to publications from 1999 through 2010 and in patient groups with an average age of 18 years old or younger. The search results were then reviewed to identify only call-back studies in which the authors clearly cited attempts at contacting patients for further data collection. Articles with insufficient data, fewer than 10 patients, or an average patient age over 18 years at time of treatment were excluded. The rate of follow-up, study location, length of follow-up, patient age, number of patients, and data collection methods were all recorded and analyzed statistically. Results: The PubMed search identified 1496 articles; 55 articles (59 cohorts) remained after application of the exclusion criteria. The average rate of patient follow-up was 69%, with considerable variability (SD±20%). Studies with more than 40 patients (64%) had poorer follow-up rates than those with fewer than 40 patients (76%) (P=0.014) and non-US articles (74%) trended toward better follow-up rates than US (64%) publications (P=0.06). Length of follow-up trended toward better follow-up with short-term studies, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.085). Conclusions: Retrospective call-back studies present challenges in obtaining further patient data. The patient population size and study location were two factors shown to affect follow-up rates. Interestingly, the length of follow-up did not significantly affect patient return rates. The average follow-up rate found in this study based on extensive literature review, 69%, may provide a general target for future publications of the same design. However, significant variation exists, and further investigation is needed to establish publication standards.
    Current Orthopaedic Practice 11/2012; 23(6):590-594. DOI:10.1097/BCO.0b013e31826efee5
Show more