Article

Bridging science and practice in violence prevention: addressing ten key challenges.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop F63, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
American Journal of Community Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.74). 07/2008; 41(3-4):197-205. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-008-9171-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article illustrates ideas for bridging science and practice generated during the Division of Violence Prevention's (DVP) dissemination/implementation planning process. The difficulty of moving what is known about what works into broader use is near universal, and this planning process pushed us to look beyond the common explanations (e.g., providers were resistant/unwilling to change practice) and think about the multiple layers and systems involved. As part of this planning process, the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation (ISF) was developed and then applied to the fields of child maltreatment and youth violence prevention. Challenges for each of the three systems in the ISF are discussed as well as and action and research ideas to address the challenges. Also described are actions taken by DVP in response to the planning process to illustrate how a funder can use the ISF to bridge science and practice.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
116 Views
  • Criminology & Public Policy 05/2013; 12(2).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At Home/Chez Soi, a large, $110-million, randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of Housing First services for 2,235 individuals who are homeless and experiencing mental illness, was implemented in five Canadian cities, beginning in fall 2009. This paper describes initial implementation of the Housing First model, focusing on specific strategies, including centrally coordinated training/technical assistance and local site coordinators as change agents in each city. Implementation of this complex intervention varied across sites but was remarkably consistent regarding the essential ingredients of the program model. A strategy that balanced a strong centrally coordinated approach to technical assistance with customization and adaptation on the local level was essential for achieving a high fidelity implementation.
    American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation 10/2013; 16(4).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review examined 140 outcome evaluations of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. The review had two goals: 1) to describe and assess the breadth, quality, and evolution of evaluation research in this area; and 2) to summarize the best available research evidence for sexual violence prevention practitioners by categorizing programs with regard to their evidence of effectiveness on sexual violence behavioral outcomes in a rigorous evaluation. The majority of sexual violence prevention strategies in the evaluation literature are brief, psycho-educational programs focused on increasing knowledge or changing attitudes, none of which have shown evidence of effectiveness on sexually violent behavior using a rigorous evaluation design. Based on evaluation studies included in the current review, only three primary prevention strategies have demonstrated significant effects on sexually violent behavior in a rigorous outcome evaluation: Safe Dates ( Foshee et al., 1996); Shifting Boundaries (building-level intervention only, Taylor, Stein, Woods, Mumford, & Forum, 2011); and funding associated with the 1994 U.S. Violence Against Women Act (VAWA; Boba & Lilley, 2009). The dearth of effective prevention strategies available to date may reflect a lack of fit between the design of many of the existing programs and the principles of effective prevention identified by Nation et al. (2003).
    Aggression and Violent Behavior 07/2014; · 1.95 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
136 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014