Genetic dissection of neural circuits.

Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Neuron (Impact Factor: 15.98). 04/2008; 57(5):634-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Understanding the principles of information processing in neural circuits requires systematic characterization of the participating cell types and their connections, and the ability to measure and perturb their activity. Genetic approaches promise to bring experimental access to complex neural systems, including genetic stalwarts such as the fly and mouse, but also to nongenetic systems such as primates. Together with anatomical and physiological methods, cell-type-specific expression of protein markers and sensors and transducers will be critical to construct circuit diagrams and to measure the activity of genetically defined neurons. Inactivation and activation of genetically defined cell types will establish causal relationships between activity in specific groups of neurons, circuit function, and animal behavior. Genetic analysis thus promises to reveal the logic of the neural circuits in complex brains that guide behaviors. Here we review progress in the genetic analysis of neural circuits and discuss directions for future research and development.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is diffi cult because of the heterogeneous phenotypic manifestation of the disease and because of the complexity of its etiology. The estimated genetic heritability of ASD is high, about 80 %. The identifi cation of individual genes involved in this syndrome is essential for advancing in the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the development of the disease. Until now, more than 600 genes have been reported in human that could be related to ASDs, and over 70 % of them are orthologs to genes present in the genome of invertebrate animal models. This particular scenario is where invertebrate animals acquire special relevance as biological models, given the relative simplicity of their nervous system compared it to that of mammals. Moreover, many of the molecular mechanisms operating in neuronal synapses are evolutionarily conserved among vertebrates and invertebrates. Invertebrates are also easy to handle, and most of them are reproduced rapidly in the laboratory, which allows obtaining many individuals to study the effect of mutations and/or environmental factors in behavior. In this chapter, we review the features that make Drosophila melanogaster , Aplysia californica , and Caenorhabditis elegans exceptional models for the study of particular genes related to ASDs. We present some examples of the functional analysis of genes associated with these disorders in these organisms and discuss molecular basis of behaviors that might be signifi cant in the etiology of ASDs.
    Organism Models of Autism Spectrum Disorders., Edited by Pierre Roubertoux, 01/2015: chapter Invertebrate models of synaptic transmission in autism spectrum disorders.: pages 157-182; Humana Press, Springer Science, New York.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in optical manipulation and observation of neural activity have set the stage for widespread implementation of closed-loop and activity-guided optical control of neural circuit dynamics. Closing the loop optogenetically (i.e., basing optogenetic stimulation on simultaneously observed dynamics in a principled way) is a powerful strategy for causal investigation of neural circuitry. In particular, observing and feeding back the effects of circuit interventions on physiologically relevant timescales is valuable for directly testing whether inferred models of dynamics, connectivity, and causation are accurate in vivo. Here we highlight technical and theoretical foundations as well as recent advances and opportunities in this area, and we review in detail the known caveats and limitations of optogenetic experimentation in the context of addressing these challenges with closed-loop optogenetic control in behaving animals. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Neuron 04/2015; 86(1):106-139. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.034 · 15.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How the brain selects one action among multiple alternatives is a central question of neuroscience. An influential model is that action preparation and selection arise from subthreshold activation of the very neurons encoding the action. Recent work, however, shows a much greater diversity of decision-related and action-related signals coexisting with other signals in populations of motor and parietal cortical neurons. We discuss how such distributed signals might be decoded by biologically plausible mechanisms. We also discuss how neurons within cortical circuits might interact with each other during action selection and preparation and how recurrent network models can help to reveal dynamical principles underlying cortical computation. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 02/2015; 33C:40-46. DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.005 · 6.77 Impact Factor


Available from