Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes.

American Institutes for Research, 921 E Fort Avenue, Suite 225, Baltimore, MD 21230, United States.
Drug and Alcohol Dependence (Impact Factor: 3.28). 07/2008; 95 Suppl 1:S5-S28. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Good Behavior Game (GBG), a method of classroom behavior management used by teachers, was tested in first- and second-grade classrooms in 19 Baltimore City Public Schools beginning in the 1985-1986 school year. The intervention was directed at the classroom as a whole to socialize children to the student role and reduce aggressive, disruptive behaviors, confirmed antecedents of later substance abuse and dependence disorders, smoking, and antisocial personality disorder. This article reports on impact to ages 19-21.
In five poor to lower-middle class, mainly African American urban areas, three or four schools were matched and within each set randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) GBG, (2) a curriculum-and-instruction program directed at reading achievement, or (3) the standard program. Balanced assignment of children to classrooms was made, and then, within intervention schools, classrooms and teachers were randomly assigned to intervention or control.
By young adulthood significant impact was found among males, particularly those in first grade who were more aggressive, disruptive, in reduced drug and alcohol abuse/dependence disorders, regular smoking, and antisocial personality disorder. These results underline the value of a first-grade universal prevention intervention. REPLICATION: A replication was implemented with the next cohort of first-grade children with the same teachers during the following school year, but with diminished mentoring and monitoring of teachers. The results showed significant GBG impact for males on drug abuse/dependence disorders with some variation. For other outcomes the effects were generally smaller but in the predicted direction.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The good behavior game (GBG) is an interdependent group contingency procedure designed to reduce disruptive behavior in classroom settings. In the GBG, a class is divided into groups, simple rules are made, and contingencies are placed on the students’ rule-following behavior. This procedure has been proven effective across various student ages, and its simplicity and long-term effects have contributed to its popularity in school settings. Although it has been systematically evaluated across a wide range of student ages, research on the GBG is lacking in the area of population- and setting-specific assessments. In this evaluation, the GBG was implemented in three classrooms (student ages 7-12) at a school for children with severe problem behavior; in particular, these students had already displayed behavior that might be described as “delinquent” or “predelinquent.” Disruptive behavior substantially decreased across all three classrooms as a result of the intervention. This application extends the current literature by systematically replicating the results of the GBG with a different population. Implementation of the GBG, population-specific obstacles, results, and future directions are discussed.
    12/2014; 4(3):1673-1682. DOI:10.1016/S2007-4719(14)70973-1
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction This review sought to determine the current evidence on the effectiveness of programmes available in the UK that aim to enhance the social and emotional skills development of children and young people aged 4-20 years. The review was commissioned by the Early Intervention Foundation (EIF), the Cabinet Office and the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission as part of wider efforts to encourage evidence-based commissioning and delivery of services for young people. Based on a systematic search of the literature, this report presents a narrative synthesis (i.e. a qualitative summary of findings as opposed to a statistical meta-analysis) of the review findings from evaluations of programmes implemented in the UK in both the school and out-of-school settings. This review addresses the question of ‘what works’ in enhancing children and young people’s social and emotional skills and the quality of existing provision in the UK. Extensive developmental research indicates that the effective mastery of social and emotional skills supports the achievement of positive life outcomes, including good health and social wellbeing, educational attainment and employment and the avoidance of behavioural and social difficulties. There is also a substantive international evidence base which shows that these skills can be enhanced and positive outcomes achieved through the implementation of effective interventions for young people. There are a number of ways of defining social and emotional skills. CASEL (2005) defined social and emotional skills as relating to the development of five interrelated sets of cognitive, affective and behavioural competencies: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills and responsible decision making. The Young Foundation (McNeil et al., 2012) identified a core set of social and emotional capabilities that are of value to young people. These capabilities have been grouped into seven clusters, each of which is supported by an evidence base that demonstrates their association with positive life outcomes. These capabilities include; managing feelings, communication, confidence and agency, planning and problem solving, relationships and leadership, creativity, resilience and determination. Drawing on existing models and frameworks, a list of these core social and emotional skills were included in this review. The key objective of this review was to systematically review the peer review and grey literature (2004- 2014) examining evidence on the effectiveness of school and out-of-school interventions implemented in the UK that are aimed at enhancing children and young people’s social and emotional skills. In reviewing the evidence, specific questions were addressed: • what programmes are effective in enhancing social and emotional skills in the (i) school setting and (ii) out-of-school setting? • what is the strength of the evidence? • what programmes/strategies are ineffective in enhancing social and emotional skills? • what are the key characteristics of effective programme? • what are the implementation requirements for these programmes / what implementation factors are important in achieving programme outcomes? • what interventions are effective according to age / gender / ethnicity /socio-economic background and level of vulnerability • what is the evidence on the costs and cost-benefits of these interventions?
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing interest in coaching to support teacher implementation of evidence-based interventions; yet, there is limited research examining the tailoring of coaching support to teachers’ needs. This paper examined coaching dosage across one school year, and the relationship between coaching contacts and teacher baseline and end-of-year data. Data came from a randomized controlled trial including 210 teachers in 18 schools implementing the Good Behavior Game (GBG), either as a stand alone or when integrated with a social-emotional learning curriculum. The overarching goal was to determine whether coaches provided varying levels of teacher contacts and how this support related to condition assignment, implementation, and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions data. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to examine the frequency of teacher contacts across the school year. GMM indicated three distinct patterns: about 58 % of teachers received a moderate number of contacts; 27 % received a consistently low number of contacts; and 15 % received high and increasing support. Teachers who received a high degree of support were more often implementing the integrated GBG and reported more negative beliefs and perceptions at the start of the school year than those in the low contact class. Teachers in the low contact class implemented the least number of games and minutes of GBG, but reported better perceptions of organizational health and burnout, at the end of the year. Coaching dosage was unrelated to observer ratings of implementation quality.
    School Mental Health 03/2015; 7(1). DOI:10.1007/s12310-015-9145-0

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014