Article

Disconnecting force from money: effects of basal ganglia damage on incentive motivation.

Laboratoire INSERM U610, Institut Fédératif de Recherches en Neurosciences, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France.
Brain (Impact Factor: 10.23). 06/2008; 131(Pt 5):1303-10. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn045
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Bilateral basal ganglia lesions have been reported to induce a particular form of apathy, termed auto-activation deficit (AAD), principally defined as a loss of self-driven behaviour that is reversible with external stimulation. We hypothesized that AAD reflects a dysfunction of incentive motivation, a process that translates an expected reward (or goal) into behavioural activation. To investigate this hypothesis, we designed a behavioural paradigm contrasting an instructed (externally driven) task, in which subjects have to produce different levels of force by squeezing a hand grip, to an incentive (self-driven) task, in which subjects can win, depending on their hand grip force, different amounts of money. Skin conductance was simultaneously measured to index affective evaluation of monetary incentives. Thirteen AAD patients with bilateral striato-pallidal lesions were compared to thirteen unmedicated patients with Parkinson's; disease (PD), which is characterized by striatal dopamine depletion and regularly associated with apathy. AAD patients did not differ from PD patients in terms of grip force response to external instructions or skin conductance response to monetary incentives. However, unlike PD patients, they failed to distinguish between monetary incentives in their grip force. We conclude that bilateral striato-pallidal damage specifically disconnects motor output from affective evaluation of potential rewards.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
120 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Apathy, characterized by lack of motivation and loss of initiative, is a non-cognitive symptom that affects a high proportion, but not all, of patients with all forms of dementia. To explore the phenomenon of apathy in people with dementia, we searched the PubMed and Google Scholar electronic databases for original research and review articles on apathetic behaviors in patients with dementia using the search terms "apathy, behavioral and psychological symptoms, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal dementia, Dementia associated with Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Vascular dementia". Some nosological aspects, neurobiological basis, and assessment of, as well as, potential benefits of non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions for apathy in dementia are discussed. Greater understanding of apathy will improve the identification, intervention, and treatment of this ubiquitous and pernicious syndrome.
    Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 10/2014; 202(10):718-724. · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, researchers have continued to make breakthroughs in understanding the clinical significance of motor symptoms in neurodevelopmental disorders, in particular, autism. With funding now available for assessment and therapy via the Federal Government's “Helping Children with Autism” initiative, there is an increased need for clinicians to have access to the latest research evidence which may both inform, and expedite the diagnostic process to ensure that this most vulnerable population is referred for timely interventions and therapies. This paper focuses on the importance of neuromotor impairment to the clinical conceptualisation of autism. There are three key ways in which motor function may be useful for improving our clinical and neurobiological understanding of autism: (a) as a quantifiable and pervasive feature of autism that may reflect a diagnostic marker; (b) as an endophenotype, for the identification of underlying genetic loci of impairment; and (c) as a potential “proxy” marker of degree and nature of social-communicative impairment. With the impending move towards neurobiological models of psychological disorder classification, motor as well as cognitive symptoms are beginning to matter to psychologists.
    Clinical Psychologist 11/2010; 14(3). · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All actions, even the simplest like moving an arm to grasp a pen, are associated with energy costs. Thus all mobile organisms possess the ability to evaluate resources and select those behaviors that are most likely to lead to the greatest accrual of valuable items (reward) in the near or, especially in the case of humans, distant future. The evaluation process is performed at all possible stages of the series of decisions that lead to the building of a goal-directed action or to its suppression. This is because all animals have a limited amount of energy and resources; to survive and be able to reproduce they have to minimize the costs and maximize the outcomes of their actions. These computations are at the root of behavioral flexibility. Two executive functions play a major role in generating flexible behaviors: (i) the ability to predict future outcomes of goal-directed actions; and (ii) the ability to cancel them when they are unlikely to accomplish valuable results. These two processes operate continuously during the entire course of a movement: during its genesis, its planning and even its execution, so that the motor output can be modulated or suppressed at any time before its execution. In this review, functional interactions of the extended neural network subserving generation and inhibition of goal-directed movements will be outlined, leading to the intriguing hypothesis that the performance of actions and their suppression are not specified by independent sets of brain regions. Rather, it will be proposed that acting and stopping are functions emerging from specific interactions between largely overlapping brain regions, whose activity is intimately linked (directly or indirectly) to the evaluations of pros and cons of an action. Such mechanism would allow the brain to perform as a highly efficient and flexible system, as different functions could be computed exploiting the same components operating in different configurations.
    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 11/2014; 8:206.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
50 Downloads
Available from
May 19, 2014