Direct association between mouse PERIOD and CKIepsilon is critical for a functioning circadian clock.

Department of Neurobiology, LRB-728, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology (Impact Factor: 5.04). 02/2004; 24(2):584-94. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.2.584-594.2004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mPER1 and mPER2 proteins have important roles in the circadian clock mechanism, whereas mPER3 is expendable. Here we examine the posttranslational regulation of mPER3 in vivo in mouse liver and compare it to the other mPER proteins to define the salient features required for clock function. Like mPER1 and mPER2, mPER3 is phosphorylated, changes cellular location, and interacts with other clock proteins in a time-dependent manner. Consistent with behavioral data from mPer2/3 and mPer1/3 double-mutant mice, either mPER1 or mPER2 alone can sustain rhythmic posttranslational events. However, mPER3 is unable to sustain molecular rhythmicity in mPer1/2 double-mutant mice. Indeed, mPER3 is always cytoplasmic and is not phosphorylated in the livers of mPer1-deficient mice, suggesting that mPER3 is regulated by mPER1 at a posttranslational level. In vitro studies with chimeric proteins suggest that the inability of mPER3 to support circadian clock function results in part from lack of direct and stable interaction with casein kinase Iepsilon (CKIepsilon). We thus propose that the CKIepsilon-binding domain is critical not only for mPER phosphorylation but also for a functioning circadian clock.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genome-wide analyses have revolutionized our ability to study the transcriptional regulation of circadian rhythms. The advent of next-generation sequencing methods has facilitated the use of two such technologies, ChIP-seq and RNA-seq. In this chapter, we describe detailed methods and protocols for these two techniques, with emphasis on their usage in circadian rhythm experiments in the mouse liver, a major target organ of the circadian clock system. Critical factors for these methods are highlighted and issues arising with time series samples for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq are discussed. Finally, detailed protocols for library preparation suitable for Illumina sequencing platforms are presented. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mammalian circadian timekeeping arises from a transcription-based feedback loop driven by a set of dedicated clock proteins. At its core, the heterodimeric transcription factor CLOCK:BMAL1 activates expression of Period, Cryptochrome and Rev-Erb genes, which feed back to repress transcription and create oscillations in gene expression that confer circadian timing cues to cellular processes. The formation of different clock protein complexes throughout this transcriptional cycle helps to establish the intrinsic ~24-hour periodicity of the clock; however, current models of circadian timekeeping lack the explanatory power to fully describe this process. Recent studies confirm the presence of at least three distinct regulatory complexes: a transcriptionally active state comprising the CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer with its coactivator CBP/p300, an early repressive state containing PER:CRY complexes, and a late repressive state marked by a poised but inactive, DNA-bound CLOCK:BMAL1:CRY1 complex. In this review we analyze high-resolution structures of core circadian transcriptional regulators and integrate biochemical data to suggest how remodeling of clock protein complexes may be achieved throughout the 24-hour cycle. Defining these detailed mechanisms will provide a foundation for understanding the molecular basis of circadian timing and help to establish new platforms for the discovery of therapeutics to manipulate the clock.
    Biochemistry 10/2014; DOI:10.1021/bi500731f · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Perspective piece of a Current Topics Collection appears to not contain an abstract. I have copied in the first paragraph of the perspective that belongs to the collection of papers on circadian clocks: 'Timing is everything' appears to be a motto not limited to human existence. In fact, keeping track of time is so important that organisms ranging from algae and insects to mammals rely on circadian clocks, endogenous molecular oscillators with a period of approximately 24 hours, to regulate diverse processes that include the cell cycle, gene expression and metabolism. Although all biological clocks are characterized by three diagnostic properties, (i) an internal timer ticking with a ca. 24-hour period, (ii) entrainment of the endogenous timer by exogenous cues such as light, and (iii) temperature compensation, the molecular players constituting the clock are not conserved across all organisms. Beyond similarities and differences as far as the cogs and gears that assemble the clock are concerned, recent research has brought to light the increasingly complex nature of clock mechanism and regulation. Thus, the assumption that a so-called transcription/translation-based feedback loop (TTFL) is at the heart of all biological clocks appears to be an over-simplification at best; in all systems a post-translational component of the timing circuitry is becoming apparent. This issue of Biochemistry bears witness to the advances in clock research achieved over the last decade by presenting a collection of seven Current Topics articles.1-7 These papers penned by a diverse group of clock researchers attest to the universal importance of circadian timing and provide insight into progress in regard to clock structure, function and mechanism in all walks of life, from seasonal flowering to circadian rhythmicity in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy.
    Biochemistry 12/2014; DOI:10.1021/bi5014968 · 3.19 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from