Article

Turnover intention in new graduate nurses: a multivariate analysis

Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.69). 05/2008; 62(1):41-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04570.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper is a report of a study to determine the relationship of new nurse turnover intent with individual characteristics, work environment variables and organizational factors and to compare new nurse turnover with actual turnover in the 18 months of employment following completion of a residency.
Because of their influence on patient safety and health outcomes nurse turnover and turnover intent have received considerable attention worldwide. When nurse staffing is inadequate, especially during nursing shortages, unfavourable clinical outcomes have been documented.
Prospective data collection took place from 1999 to 2006 with 889 new paediatric nurses who completed the same residency. Scores on study instruments were related to likelihood of turnover intent using logistic regression analysis models. Relationships between turnover intent and actual turnover were compared using Kaplan-Meier survivorship.
The final model demonstrated that older respondents were more likely to have turnover intent if they did not get their ward choice. Also higher scores on work environment and organizational characteristics contributed to likelihood that the new nurse would not be in the turnover intent group. These factors distinguish a new nurse with turnover intent from one without 79% of the time. Increased seeking of social support was related to turnover intent and older new graduates were more likely to be in the turnover intent group if they did not get their ward choice.
When new graduate nurses are satisfied with their jobs and pay and feel committed to the organization, the odds against turnover intent decrease.

Full-text

Available from: Pauline C Beecroft, Apr 02, 2015
3 Followers
 · 
165 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences, motivations & consequences of nurses who have encountered aggressive behaviors in the workplace. It was proposed that the nurses' narratives would yield detailed, in depth information about their bullying experiences. Background/Significance: Bullying in the healthcare setting has been long-recognized internationally. However, in the US, workplace aggression is underreported which keeps it from emerging as the problem that it is. The fallout is disastrous; compromised work performance, absenteeism, and ultimately, increased job turnover and there may be a relationship between job satisfaction and negative patient outcomes. Newly graduates are at significant risk with resignation rates higher during the first year of practice. Methods: A constructivist grounded theory approach was used in this study. A convenience sample of 303 US RNs responded to an online survey identifying the frequency, type, perpetrators, and personal and professional consequences of bullying and aggressive behavior. The results of the main study have been reported elsewhere. Ninety-nine of the 303 respondents answered an open ended question in the online survey asking them to describe a bullying situation. Respondents who did not describe specific situations, e.g. opinion or commentary, were excluded from analysis. A preliminary reading of 81 narratives was followed by line by line and focused coding guided by the constant comparative method. Results: The findings of this qualitative study shape a grounded theory of how nurses "make things right" when confronted with bullying in their professional lives. The elements of "making things right" are "placing" bullying in a context, "assessing" the event, "taking action" and "judging outcomes". Time, milieu and interpersonal dynamics influence the actions of the nurse. A minority of respondents wrote about bullying events early in their careers. A majority of respondents wrote about how patient care is threatened, the humiliation of bullying and the more subtle acts of social aggression. Nurses also described how they assessed the situation and the actions they took to "make things right." Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The findings of this study reveal that nurses are not helpless victims of bullying. They are keenly aware that bullying compromises patient care and know it is their obligation to change a potentially harmful situation. New collaborative models between staff and administration are proposed.
    5th Annual NDNQI Conference; 01/2011
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New nurse burnout has personal and organizational costs. The combined effect of authentic leadership, person-job fit within areas of worklife, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new nurses' burnout and emotional wellbeing has not been investigated. This study tested a model linking authentic leadership, areas of worklife, occupational coping self-efficacy, burnout, and mental health among new graduate nurses. We also tested the validity of the concept of interpersonal strain at work as a facet of burnout. A cross-sectional national survey of Canadian new graduate nurses was conducted. Registered nurses working in direct patient care in acute care settings with less than 3 years of experience were selected from provincial registry databases of 10 Canadian provinces. A total of 1009 of 3743 surveyed new graduate nurses were included in the final sample (useable response rate 27%). Participants received a mail survey package that included a letter of information, study questionnaire, and a $2 coffee voucher. To optimize response rates non-responders received a reminder letter four weeks after the initial mailing, followed by a second survey package four weeks after that. Ethics approval was obtained from the university ethics board prior to starting the study. Descriptive statistics and scale reliabilities were analyzed. Structural equation modelling with maximum likelihood estimation was used to test the fit between the data and the hypothesized model and to assess the factor structure of the expanded burnout measure. The hypothesized model was an acceptable fit for the data (χ(2) (164)=1221.38; χ(2) ratio=7.447; CFI=.921; IFI=.921; RMSEA=.08). All hypothesized paths were significant. Authentic leadership had a positive effect on areas of worklife, which in turn had a positive effect on occupational coping self-efficacy, resulting in lower burnout, which was associated with poor mental health. Authentic leaders may play an important role in creating positive working conditions and strengthening new nurses' confidence that help them cope with job demands, thereby protecting them from developing burnout and poor mental health. Leadership training to develop supervisors' authentic leadership skills may promote the development of person-job fit, thereby increasing occupational self-efficacy and new nurses' wellbeing. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    International journal of nursing studies 03/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.002 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine predictors of clinical leadership skill (CLS) for RNs with 24 months of clinical experience or less. BACKGROUND: New graduate nurse transition programs (NGNTPs) have been proposed as a strategy to increase CLS. CLS is associated with positive patient outcomes. METHOD: Method used was hierarchical regression modeling to evaluate predictors of CLS among individual characteristics of RNs and characteristics of NGNTPs. RESULTS: Perceived overall quality of an NGNTP was the strongest predictor of CLS (R-2 = 0.041, P < .01). Clinical experience and NGNTP characteristics accounted for 6.9% of the variance in CLS and 12.6% of the variance among RNs with assigned mentors (P < .01). RNs participating in NGNTPs for more than 24 weeks were 21 times more likely to remain employed within the organization when compared with NGNTPs of 12 weeks or less, a significant cost-benefit to the organization. CONCLUSION: Although perceived overall quality of a NGNTP was the strongest predictor of CLS, much of the variance in CLS remains unexplained.
    JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration 12/2014; 44(12):659-68. DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000144 · 1.37 Impact Factor