Resistance Training Conserves Fat-free Mass and Resting Energy Expenditure Following Weight Loss

Department of Human Studies, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 3.73). 05/2008; 16(5):1045-51. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.38
Source: PubMed


To determine what effect diet-induced approximately 12 kg weight loss in combination with exercise training has on body composition and resting energy expenditure (REE) in premenopausal African-American (AA) and European-American (EA) women.
This study was a longitudinal, randomized weight loss clinical intervention, with either aerobic (AT), resistance (RT), or no exercise training (NT). Forty-eight AA and forty-six EA premenopausal overweight (BMI between 27 and 30) women underwent weight loss to a BMI<25. Body composition (densitometry), REE (indirect calorimetry), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), and muscular strength (isometric elbow flexion) were evaluated when subjects were in energy balance.
AA women lost less fat-free mass (FFM, P<or=0.05) (47.0+/-4.6 to 46.9+/-5.0 kg) than EA women (46.4+/-4.9 to 45.2+/-4.6 kg). Regardless of race, RT maintained FFM (P<or=0.05) following weight loss (46.9+/-5.2 to 47.2+/-5.0 kg) whereas AT (45.4+/-4.2 to 44.4+/-4.1 kg) and NT (47.9+/-4.7 to 46.4+/-5.1 kg) decreased FFM (P<or=0.05). Both AT and NT decreased in REE with weight loss but RT did not. Significant time by group interactions (all P<or=0.05) for strength indicated that RT maintained strength and AT did not.
AA women lost less FFM than EA women during equivalent weight losses. However, following weight loss in both AA and EA, RT conserved FFM, REE, and strength fitness when compared to women who AT or did not train.

Download full-text


Available from: Jose Fernandez, Oct 06, 2014
1 Follower
75 Reads
    • "They also concluded that exercise added to a low-calorie diet increases relative fat loss. However, studies are inconclusive on whether aerobic training and resistance training similarly preserve lean mass or resistance training is more beneficial [30] [31] [32] [33]. A meta-analysis comparing formerly obese persons and weight-matched controls found that the formerly obese have a higher body fat mass percentage by 2.5% [34]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achieving maintenance of weight loss is crucial to combat obesity. However, most individuals tend to regain weight. Data from successful maintainers show that they remain vigilant and constantly apply techniques to oppose the course of regaining. On the other hand, current advances in obesity research show that the reduced obese state is a state of altered physiology in terms of energy balance. This review describes the physiological adaptations occurring after weight loss that predispose to regaining. Specifically, changes regarding body composition, hormonal background, energy expenditure and control of food intake are discussed. Moreover, metabolites that can act as regain predictors and dietary techniques to oppose regaining are presented.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental 09/2015; 64(11). DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2015.08.006 · 3.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "muscle) (Byrne & Wilmore, 2001). Interestingly, these studies also found that the combination of endurance and resistance training leads to an overall decrease in REE (Westerterp et al., 1992; Byrne & Wilmore, 2001), but that this exercise-related decrease was evident with endurance training, while a net increase in REE was found after RT (Hunter et al., 2008). These results explain why in recent years there has been a lot of interest in the specific effects of RT on weight control, and it is also the case that resistance training (RT) has only been incorporated recently as an important component of exercise protocols for weight control in some guidelines (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2005; Donnelly et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although resistance training (RT) has long been accepted as a means for developing and maintaining muscular strength, endurance, power and muscle mass, its beneficial relationship with health factors and chronic disease has only recently been recognized in the scientific literature. Prior to 1990, resistance training was not a part of the recommended guidelines for exercise training and rehabilitation for either the American Heart Association or the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). In 1990, the ACSM recognized resistance training as a significant component of a comprehensive fitness programme for healthy adults of all ages, a position subsequently confirmed few years after. At present, even though interest in clinical applications of RT is increasing, there are still some concerns, among physicians, about the use of this exercise methodology in weight control programmes. This review aims to explore the metabolic effects of RT and its efficacy and feasibility in overweight subjects.
    Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 02/2014; 35(1). DOI:10.1111/cpf.12136 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Both aerobic endurance exercise and resistance training can promote substantial benefits in physical fitness and health-related factors in older individuals [2-4]. Endurance training seems to be more effective in decreasing fat mass, resting heart rate and blood pressure [1] whereas resistance training seems to be more effective for enhancing bone mineral density [5] muscle strength [6], basal metabolism [7,8] and muscle and connective tissue cross-sectional area [9]. Both training methods have been found to improve glucose metabolism and lipid profile even if with conflicting results [10-12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the physiological effects of an high-intensity circuit training (HICT) on several cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy, overweight middle-aged subjects, and to compare the effects of HICT to traditional endurance training (ET) and low-intensity circuit training (LICT). Fifty-eight participants (ages 61+/-3.3 yrs, BMI 29.8+/-0.9 ) were randomly assigned to one of the three exercise treatment groups: HICT, LICT and ET. The three groups exercised three times per week, 50 min per session for 12 weeks. Baseline and after intervention anthropometric characteristics: body weight (BW), fat mass (FM); blood pressure: diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP), blood parameters; CHOL-t (total cholesterol), LDL-C (low density lipoprotein-cholesterol), HDL-C (high density lipoprotein-cholesterol), TG (triglycerides), ApoB and ratio ApoB/ApoA1 were measured. Compared to other groups, HICT showed significantly higher reductions in FM, DBP, CHOLt, LDL-C, TG, ApoB and significantly greater increases in high density HDL-C. LICT resulted in the greatest reduction in SBP. All groups showed a significant improvement of BW without any significant differences between groups. Our findings indicate that high-intensity circuit training is more effective in improving blood pressure, lipoproteins and triglycerides than endurance training alone or lower intensity circuit training.
    Lipids in Health and Disease 09/2013; 12(1):131. DOI:10.1186/1476-511X-12-131 · 2.22 Impact Factor
Show more