The effect of name-based reporting and partner notification on HIV testing in New York State.

Office of Program Evaluation and Research, AIDS Institute, New York State Department of Health, Riverview Center, 150 Broadway, Suite 516, Menands, NY 12204, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 05/2008; 98(4):728-35. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.092742
Source: PubMed


We examined the effect of New York's HIV Reporting and Partner Notification law on HIV testing levels and on the HIV testing decisions of high-risk individuals.
In-person interviews were administered to 761 high-risk individuals to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding HIV testing and reporting. Trends in HIV testing were also assessed in publicly funded HIV counseling and testing programs, Medicaid, and New York's Maternal Pediatric Newborn Prevention and Care Program.
High-risk individuals had limited awareness of the reporting and notification law, and few cited concern about named reporting as a reason for avoiding or delaying HIV testing. HIV testing levels, posttest counseling rates, and anonymous-to-confidential conversion rates among those who tested HIV positive were not affected by the law. Medicaid-related HIV testing rates also remained stable. HIV testing during pregnancy continued to trend upward following implementation of the law. Findings held true within demographic and risk-related subgroups.
HIV reporting has permitted improved monitoring of New York's HIV/AIDS epidemic. This benefit has not been offset by decreases in HIV testing behavior, including willingness to test among those at high risk of acquiring HIV.

Download full-text


Available from: Chris Nemeth, Sep 15, 2014
19 Reads
  • Source
    • "There is also a rich, if less well organized, research literature on incidental public health law. For example, researchers have studied the unintended consequences of HIV reporting laws on attitudes towards testing, time of testing, and willingness to be tested (Hecht et al. 2000; Tesoriero et al. 2008). Research on the health effects of infrastructural health law has been more limited. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Public health law has received considerable attention in recent years and has become an essential field in public health. Public health law research, however, has received less attention. Expert commentary. This article explores public health law research, defined as the scientific study of the relation of law and legal practices to population health. The article offers a logic model of public health law research and a typology of approaches to studying the effects of law on public health. Research on the content and prevalence of public health laws, processes of adopting and implementing laws, and the extent to which and mechanisms through which law affects health outcomes can use methods drawn from epidemiology, economics, sociology, and other disciplines. The maturation of public health law research as a field depends on methodological rigor, adequate research funding, access to appropriate data sources, and policymakers' use of research findings. Public health law research is a young field but holds great promise for supporting evidence-based policy making that will improve population health.
    Milbank Quarterly 06/2010; 88(2):169-210. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00595.x · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • Journal Européen des Urgences 05/2007; 20(1):18-18. DOI:10.1016/j.jeur.2007.03.113
  • Source
    American Journal of Public Health 10/2008; DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2008.143313 · 4.55 Impact Factor
Show more