Article

Treatment disparities for disabled medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.18). 05/2008; 89(4):595-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.042
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Treatment disparities for disabled Medicare beneficiaries with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
To compare initial treatment and survival of nonelderly adults with and without disabilities newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer.
Retrospective analyses; population-based cohorts.
Eleven Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries.
Persons with disability Medicare entitlement (n=1016) and nondisabled persons (n=8425) ages 21 to 64 years when diagnosed with stage I, pathologically confirmed, first primary non-small cell lung cancer between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1999.
Not applicable.
Initial cancer treatments (surgery, radiotherapy), survival (through December 31, 2001). Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression estimated adjusted associations of disability status with treatments and survival.
Persons with disabilities were much more likely to be male, non-Hispanic black, and not currently married. Although 82.2% of nondisabled persons had surgery, 68.5% of disabled persons received operations. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) of receiving surgery were especially low for persons with respiratory disabilities (adjusted RR=.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], .67-.85), nervous system conditions (adjusted RR=.86; 95% CI, .76-.98), and mental health and/or mental retardation disorders (adjusted RR=.92; 95% CI, .86-.99). Persons with disabilities had significantly higher cancer-specific mortality rates (hazard ratio [HR]=1.37; 95% CI, 1.24-1.51) than persons without disabilities. Observed differences in cancer mortality persisted after adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics (adjusted relative HR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.39). Further adjustment for surgery use eliminated statistically significant differences in cancer mortality between persons with and without disabilities across disabling conditions.
Persons with disabilities were much less likely than nondisabled Medicare beneficiaries to receive surgery; statistically significant cancer-specific mortality differences disappeared after accounting for these treatment differences. Future research must explore reasons for these findings and whether survival of disabled Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer could improve if surgical treatment disparities were eliminated.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
65 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Personal control over end-of-life (EOL) care via advance care planning is a key component of high-quality care. Although this desire for control has been well documented in some populations, EOL care issues are not well understood within the disabilities community. Objective: The objective for this study was to describe the relationships between individual demographic characteristics, health-related quality of life, health locus of control, and attitudes toward advance directives (ADs) in individuals who are disabilities activists. Methods: We surveyed 55 participants attending a disability conference. Instruments included a demographic data sheet, the Advance Directive Attitude Survey (ADAS), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale, and the Functional Assessment of Non-Life Threatening Conditions quality of life (QOL) scale. Results: Most participants were Hispanic females with some college education. About 46% had a disability. Group means revealed a high level of QOL (M=75.72, SD=19.09) and a positive attitude about ADs (M=66.49, SD=8.03). On the Opportunities for Treatment Choices subscale of the ADAS, activists without disabilities (M=14.23) were more positive about their control over EOL decisions than were the activists with disabilities (M=12.97) [t(2,52)=2.116, p<0.05]. Conclusions: Although participants were positive about ADs, differences in attitudes about control over opportunities for treatment choices between the nondisabled and disabled groups support previous findings that people with disabilities may have concerns regarding undertreatment for serious health conditions. Further study of EOL care issues for persons with disabilities is warranted.
    Journal of palliative medicine 06/2013; · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a particularly devastating type of stroke which is responsible for one third of all stroke-related years of potential life lost before age 65. Surgical treatment has been shown to decrease both morbidity and mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage. We hypothesized that payer status other than private insurance is associated with lower allocation to surgical treatment for patients with SAH and worse outcomes.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(8):e105124. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. We examined disparities among US adults with disabilities and the degree to which health insurance attenuates disparities by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES). Methods. We pooled data from the 2001-2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey on individuals with disabilities aged 18 to 64 years. We modeled measures of access and use as functions of predisposing, enabling, need, and contextual factors. We then included health insurance and examined the extent to which it reduced observed differences by race, ethnicity, and SES. Results. We found evidence of disparities in access and use among adults with disabilities. Adjusting for health insurance reduced these disparities most consistently for emergency department use. Uninsured individuals experienced substantially poorer access across most measures, including reporting a usual source of care and experiencing delays in or being unable to obtain care. Conclusions. Although health insurance is an important enabling resource among adults with disabilities, its effect on reducing differences by race, ethnicity, and SES on health care access and use was limited. Research exploring the effects of factors such as patient-provider interactions is warranted. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print December 12, 2013: e1-e9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301478).
    American Journal of Public Health 12/2013; · 3.93 Impact Factor