Article

Dermatological implications of skeletal aging: a focus on supraperiosteal volumization for perioral rejuvenation.

Le Col, Les Escombes, Roussas, France.
Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD (Impact Factor: 1.32). 04/2008; 7(3):209-20.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is becoming widely accepted that volume changes in the skin and soft tissue contribute greatly to age-related facial reshaping. A significant contribution to these volume changes is the loss of craniofacial skeletal support to the overlying soft tissue. Gravity, once considered the major culprit in facial aging, is now recognized to determine the direction, rather than the extent, of tissue deflation. Although the sequence of events observed in aging is somewhat predictable, its pace among individuals is variable and may be influenced by both intrinsic (e.g., gender, genetics) and extrinsic (e.g., photoaging, smoking, stress) factors. Changes in different tissue layers within a single individual do not occur independently, but interdependently; changes in one tissue within an individual may influence subsequent changes in other tissues. Midfacial soft tissue descent has been observed in response to decreased craniofacial support in both congenital craniofacial hypoplasia and following trauma, leading to a hypothesis that the loss of underlying bony support for any reason, including aging, leads to soft tissue descent in the face. As craniofacial support (the "table") decreases, it leaves less surface area for the outer soft tissue envelope (the "tablecloth") causing it to fold or sag. Replacing this deep support with craniofacial implants has been shown to reposition the overlying soft tissue. Following a brief review of the current literature on aging changes in the skin, soft tissue, and bone; the authors describe their experience with the use of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), both as a soft tissue volumizer and as an injectable craniofacial implant in a supraperiosteal location to address both soft tissue volume loss and loss of craniofacial support. In the cases presented, the most striking result noted was the ability to restore a youthful proportion to the perioral area, which had not been achieved previously with soft tissue treatment alone.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
72 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Facial aging is a gradual process that involves a complex interaction of multiple factors including cutaneous photodamage and laxity, subcutaneous tissue volume loss, and bony resorption. These features have all been show to significantly improve with intense pulsed light (IPL), microfocused ultrasound (MFUS, Ultherapy), and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA).
    Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 06/2014; 13(2):109-18. · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Soft-tissue augmentation with injectable fillers is commonly performed in the malar area. A four-point scale, the Medicis Midface Volume Scale, was developed and validated as an objective measure of the severity of midface volume loss. : Using a separate photographic guide, four investigators rated photographs (front and right and left sides, to provide a full view of the face) of 60 untreated subjects in random order during two sessions 2 or more weeks apart. Both sides of the midface were scored separately as follows: 1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing. : Most subjects (mean age, 45.7 years; range, 23 to 80 years) were women (72 percent) and white (87 percent). Intraobserver agreement between sessions was "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.918; 95 percent CI, 0.887 to 0.949) and left (0.911; 95 percent CI, 0.878 to 0.943) sides. Intraobserver exact agreement between sessions was 87.1 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the right side and 86.3 percent (range, 76.7 to 95.0 percent) for the left. Interobserver agreement was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (weighted kappa scores) for the right (0.759 to 0.893) and left (0.758 to 0.888) sides. Interobserver exact agreement was 72.5 to 87.5 percent for the right side and 72.5 to 86.7 percent for the left. Overall, results were similar in nonwhite and white subjects. : Consistent agreement by different evaluators and the same evaluator at different times validates the four-point Medicis Midface Volume Scale as suitable to objectively measure the severity of midface volume loss. : Diagnostic IV.
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 12/2012; 130(6):1330-6. · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improved understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the aging face has laid the foundation for adopting an earlier and more comprehensive approach to facial rejuvenation, shifting the focus from individual wrinkle treatment and lift procedures to a holistic paradigm that considers the entire face and its structural framework. This article presents an overview of a comprehensive method to address facial aging. The key components to the reported strategy for improving facial cosmesis include, in addition to augmentation of volume loss, protection with sunscreens and antioxidants; promotion of epidermal cell turnover with techniques such as superficial chemical peels; microlaser peels and microdermabrasion; collagen stimulation and remodeling via light, ultrasound, or radiofrequency (RF)-based methods; and muscle control with botulinum toxin. For the treatment of wrinkles and for the augmentation of pan-facial dermal lipoatrophy, several types of fillers and volumizers including hyaluronic acid (HA), autologous fat, and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) or injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) are available. A novel bimodal, trivector technique to restore structural facial volume loss that combines supraperiosteal depot injections of volume-depleted fat pads and dermal/subcutaneous injections for panfacial lipoatrophy with PLLA is presented. The combination of treatments with fillers; toxins; light-, sound-, and RF-based technologies; and surgical procedures may help to forestall the facial aging process and provide more natural results than are possible with any of these techniques alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 01/2013; · 1.26 Impact Factor