Article

Bio-resorbable versus metal implants in wrist fractures: a randomised trial.

Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, postbus 5011, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.36). 05/2008; 128(12):1413-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0573-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Distal radius fractures are often surgically treated if insufficient reduction has been achieved or after conservative treatment has failed. Treatment using metal implants often demands a secondary operation to remove the implant. A bio-resorbable implant (in this study the Reunite osteosynthesis plate by Biomet Inc) should obviate the need for a secondary operation with equal functional results.
Thirty-two patients with a distal radius fracture were assigned to treatment with either a bio-resorbable implant (N = 19) or a metal implant (N = 13). Both groups received the same postoperative care and were followed for 52 weeks in the outpatient clinic. The hypothesis of this study was a decrease in re-operation rate in the experimental group with equal functional results.
Five out of 19 patients treated with the Reunite plate were re-operated and four out of 13 treated with metal implants needed a secondary operation. In both implants, equal functional results in Range of Motion and DASH scores were found.
There were no significant differences between the experimental and control group with respect to re-operations, DASH scores and Range of Motion. Because of the higher initial costs and equal results, the use of bio-resorbable implants must be considered carefully.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
62 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bioabsorbable internal fixation has been clinically available for nearly 20 years and has been used for hard tissue and/or soft tissue fixation from the head to toe. During this time, there has been a rapid evolution in bioabsorbable polymers as well as in the implants and their clinical applications. There is a plethora of bioabsorbable polymers now available for clinical use, and although all are related chemically, seemingly small changes in formulation can have a dramatic effect on their biomechanical and physiological properties. This article summarizes much of the relevant scientific, technical, and clinical literature in a simple, straightforward manner to help surgeons better understand and appreciate the nuances of bioabsorbable fixation. This up-to-date review should also help researchers establish a baseline of knowledge that can provide a platform for further developments in this exciting field.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 03/2011; 22(2):679-89. · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Volar plating is commonly used in the management of distal radius fractures; bioresorbable plates have attractive features. We compared a bioresorbable plate with a latest generation and an established locked titanium plate. Twenty-four fresh-frozen radii (12 pairs) were assigned to three mean bone mineral density-matched groups of eight radii each. A standardized extraarticular distal radius fracture was created and plated using one implant type per group. Postplating stiffness and displacement were studied in a first axial-loading test (15 cycles at 250 N). Next, biodegradation was simulated by 4 weeks' immersion in phosphate-buffered saline, followed by a second axial test. Finally, the specimens underwent cyclic loading (2,400 cycles at 250 N). It is clear from the initial test that the LCP plate was significantly stiffer and displaced less than the bioresorbable plate. The outcome of the postimmersion tests is that one bioresorbable plate failed early on after 4 weeks' immersion, and the remaining bioresorbable plates and the T plates did not differ significantly. Cyclic tests conclude that the LCP plate was significantly superior to the other systems. One T plate and four of the bioresorbable plates failed, but none of the LCP plates failed. In the bioresorbable constructs, stability, time to failure, and bone mineral density were significantly correlated. The LCP plate was biomechanically superior and may be generally recommended for the volar plating of distal radius fractures. Except one plate failure, the bioresorbable plate was similar to the T plate in the quasi-static tests and should, therefore, be considered for clinical studies, with patient selection confined, initially, only to candidates with good bone stock quality.
    The Journal of trauma 12/2009; 68(4):984-91. · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Magnesium alloys offer great advantages as degradable implant material for pediatric fracture fixation and hold the potential to overcome certain critical shortcomings inherent to currently used degradable (co)polymers. Besides good biocompatibility and appropriate degradation kinetics, sufficient implant anchorage in host bone is critical to prevent implant failure. Bone-implant anchorage of biodegradable magnesium alloys, however, has not yet been related and compared to that of copolymers, their degradable counterparts currently in clinical use. The aim of this study, therefore, was to comparatively assess bone-implant interface strength and the amount of peri-implant bone of a biodegradable magnesium alloy pin (Mg-Y-Nd-HRE) and a self-reinforced copolymeric control (85/15 poly(l-lactic-co-glycolic acid)). To this purpose, push-out testing, microfocus computed tomography (μCT), histological and scanning electron microscopic examination was performed after 4, 12 and 24 weeks of transcortical implantation in 72 rats. Biomechanical testing revealed significantly higher ultimate shear strength for the magnesium alloy pins than for the copolymeric controls at all 3 timepoints (P≤0.001 for all comparisons). As evaluated by μCT, the amount of bone present near the interface and in a wider radius (up to 0.5mm) around it was higher in the magnesium alloy implants at 4 weeks, without significant differences at 12 and 24 weeks. Histological examination confirmed direct bone-to-implant contact for both implant types. In vivo degradation of implants did not induce any noticeable local or systemic inflammation. This data suggests that the investigated degradable magnesium alloy rod exhibits markedly superior bone-implant interface strength and a greater amount of peri-implant bone than a self-reinforced copolymeric control currently in use; thus it fulfills a crucial prerequisite for its successful clinical deployment as an alternative degradable orthopedic implant material. Further studies, however, are warranted to evaluate the long-term degradation behavior and biocompatibility of the investigated degradable magnesium-based alloy.
    Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 08/2013; 28C:232-243.