A Randomized Intervention Trial to Reduce the Lending of Used Injection Equipment Among Injection Drug Users Infected With Hepatitis C

Division of International Health and Cross Cultural Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, Mailstop 0622, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 06/2008; 98(5):853-61. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113415
Source: PubMed


We evaluated the efficacy of a peer-mentoring behavioral intervention designed to reduce risky distributive injection practices (e.g., syringe lending, unsafe drug preparation) among injection drug users with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
A randomized trial with a time-equivalent attention-control group was conducted among 418 HCV-positive injection drug users aged 18 to 35 years in 3 US cities. Participants reported their injection-related behaviors at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
Compared with the control group, intervention-group participants were less likely to report distributive risk behaviors at 3 months (odds ratio [OR]=0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.27, 0.79) and 6 months (OR=0.51; 95% CI=0.31, 0.83), a 26% relative risk reduction, but were no more likely to cite their HCV-positive status as a reason for refraining from syringe lending. Effects were strongest among intervention-group participants who had known their HCV-positive status for at least 6 months. Peer mentoring and self-efficacy were significantly increased among intervention-group participants, and intervention effects were mediated through improved self-efficacy.
This behavioral intervention reduced unsafe injection practices that may propagate HCV among injection drug users.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard S Garfein, Oct 05, 2015
15 Reads
  • Source
    • "In lieu of SEPs, behavioral and clinical interventions may be applicable. Peer-driven and other behavioral interventions could also be considered as a way to reduce HCV risk behavior in this population [Garfein et al., 2007; Latka et al., 2008; Sacks-Davis et al., 2011]. Programs and funding to improve residents' access to health care and to drug treatment also could help to prevent and/or mitigate the long-term consequences of HCV infection. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has demonstrated that hepatitis C (HCV) genotype distribution varies geographically and demographically. This exploratory study examines HCV viremia, viral concentration, and genotype distribution among anti-HCV positive, rural Appalachian nonmedical prescription drug users. The study population was randomly selected from a pool of 200 anti-HCV positive participants in a longitudinal study. Those randomly chosen were representative of the overall pool in terms of demographics, drug use, and other risk behaviors. Participants were tested serologically for HCV RNA, viral concentration, and genotype, and interview-administered questionnaires examined behavioral and demographic characteristics. Of the 81 participants, 69% tested RNA positive, 59% of which had viral loads exceeding 800,000 IU/ml. Approximately 66% of the RNA positive sample had genotype 1a; types 2b (16%) and 3a (13%) were less common. RNA positive participants were not significantly different than RNA negative participants demographically or behaviorally. Likewise, with the exception of education, genotype 1 participants were not significantly different than those with genotype 2 or 3. The prevalence of active HCV infection highlights a need for prevention and treatment in this population. However, the predominance of genotype 1 may present challenges due to its association with decreased responsiveness to drug treatment, although the novel class of direct-acting antivirals such as telaprevir and boceprevir offer new hope in this regard. The prevalence of genotype 1 may also foreshadow heightened burden of hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated healthcare expenditures. More research is needed to characterize HCV infection and genotype in this population.
    Journal of Medical Virology 09/2012; 84(9):1376-87. DOI:10.1002/jmv.23252 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It was based on components from two multi-site randomized behavioral intervention trials conducted in the U.S. that focused on reducing injection risks among HIV-negative IDUs who were HCV-positive or HCV-negative, respectively; STRIVE (Study To Reduce Intravenous Exposures)[37] and DUIT (Drug User Intervention Trial)[30]. Both interventions were shown to be highly efficacious in significantly reducing receptive and distributive sharing of injection equipment [38,39], and were listed as evidence based interventions by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention ([40]. Details on how components of these interventions were adapted for Mujer Mas Segura are described in the Additional file 1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Female sex workers who inject drugs (FSW-IDUs) are at risk of acquiring HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STI) and blood-borne infections through unprotected sex and sharing injection equipment. We conducted a 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial to evaluate combination interventions to simultaneously reduce sexual and injection risks among FSW-IDUs in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Methods/design FSW-IDUs ≥18 years reporting sharing injection equipment and unprotected sex with clients within the last month were randomized to one of four conditions based on an a priori randomization schedule, blinding interviewer/counselors to assignment. Due to the extreme vulnerability of this population, we did not include a control group that would deny some women access to preventive information. All women received similar information regardless of group allocation; the difference was in the way the information was delivered and the extent to which women had an interactive role. Each condition was a single 60-minute session, including either an interactive or didactic version of an injection risk intervention and sexual risk intervention. Women underwent interviewer-administered surveys and testing for HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Trichomonas at baseline and quarterly for 12 months. Combined HIV/STI incidence will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are proportionate reductions in sharing of injection equipment and unprotected sex with clients. Discussion Of 1,132 women, 548 (48.4%) were excluded (88.9% were ineligible; 11.1% refused to participate or did not return); 584 eligible women enrolled (284 in Tijuana; 300 in Ciudad Juarez). All 584 participants completed the baseline interview, provided biological samples and were randomized to one of the four groups. During follow-up, 17 participants (2.9%) were lost to follow-up, of whom 10 (58.8%) had died, leaving 567 participants for analysis. This study appears to be the first intervention to attempt to simultaneously reduce injection and sexual risk behaviors among FSW-IDUs. The factorial design will permit analysis to determine whether the combination of the two interactive interventions and/or its respective components are effective in reducing injection and/or sexual risks, which will have direct, tangible policy implications for Mexico and potentially other resource-poor countries. Trial registration NCT00840658
    BMC Public Health 08/2012; 12(1):653. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-653 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Gaining HCV vaccine trial and prevention knowledge may generate benefits that are twofold; it may serve to directly increase individual knowledge as well as providing an opportunity for PWID to accomplish altruistic goals of communicating knowledge within their social networks, which, in turn, may increase the value of trial participation for individual PWID. Peer-driven interventions are increasingly important and have been shown to be effective in reducing injection risk behaviours among HCV negative (Garfein et al., 2007; Mackesy-Amiti et al., 2011), HCV positive (Latka et al., 2008) and mixed (Tobin et al., 2011) populations of PWID, and may optimise prevention efforts in future vaccine trials. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A safe and efficacious vaccine may be the most efficient and cost-effective strategy for controlling the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic among people who inject drugs (PWID) and several candidates are in development. However, little is known about the factors that influence willingness to participate (WTP) in candidate HCV vaccine trials among this group. HCV seronegative PWID recruited between 2008 and 2010 as part of a prospective observational cohort study in Sydney, Australia were asked whether they would be willing to participate in a future candidate hepatitis C vaccine trial and to provide reasons to explain their decision. Of 113 participants, 74% indicated WTP, 15% were unwilling to participate and 11% reported WTP that was contingent on vaccine characteristics and trial design issues. The most commonly reported motivator for hypothetical trial participation was altruism, followed by potential health benefits, financial remuneration, and knowledge gain. Barriers to hypothetical participation included fears about possible harms to health, such as concerns about vaccine safety, side effects, and acquiring HCV from the vaccine; other barriers included mistrust of biomedical research and time constraints. These results may be useful in designing strategies to enhance HCV vaccine trial recruitment and retention and have ethical implications for developing informed consent processes and standards of care.
    Drug and alcohol dependence 11/2011; 123(1-3):35-40. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.009 · 3.42 Impact Factor
Show more