Article

Cost of antipsychotic polypharmacy in the treatment of schizophrenia

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
BMC Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.24). 04/2008; 8(1):19. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-19
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study compared the costs of antipsychotic polypharmacy for patients who initiated on 1 of the 3 most commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics - olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone.
Data were drawn from a large, prospective, naturalistic, multi-site, nonrandomized study of treatment for schizophrenia in the United States conducted between July 1997 and September 2003. Participants who were initiated on olanzapine (N = 405), quetiapine (N = 115), or risperidone (N = 276) were followed for 1 year post initiation and compared on: (a) average daily cost of the index antipsychotic while on the index antipsychotic, (b) average daily cost of the coprescribed antipsychotics while on the index antipsychotic, (c) average daily cost of the index antipsychotic and the coprescribed antipsychotics while on the index antipsychotic, (d) total annual cost of antipsychotic medications prescribed in the year following initiation on the index antipsychotic, using propensity score-adjusted bootstrap resampling method. Average daily antipsychotic costs and total annual antipsychotic costs were also estimated using more recent (2004) antipsychotic drug prices.
During the 1 year following initiation on the index antipsychotic, the total average daily cost of the index antipsychotic was higher for quetiapine ($15.33) than olanzapine ($13.90, p < .05) and risperidone ($11.04, p < .01), although the average daily cost of the index antipsychotic was higher for olanzapine ($10.08) than risperidone ($6.74, p < .01) or quetiapine ($6.63, p < .01). Lower total average daily costs were observed in risperidone than olanzapine or quetiapine. Significantly lower average daily cost of concomitant antipsychotic medications for olanzapine ($3.82) compared to quetiapine ($8.70, p < .01) or risperidone-initiated patients ($4.30, p < .01) contributed to the lower average daily cost of all antipsychotic medication for olanzapine-initiated patients. Each dollar spent on the index antipsychotic was accompanied by spending an additional $1.31 on concomitant antipsychotics for quetiapine compared to $0.64 for risperidone and $0.38 for olanzapine-initiated patients. A separate intent-to-treat analysis of the total annual antipsychotic cost found a significantly higher total annual antipsychotic cost for quetiapine-initiated patients ($5320) compared to olanzapine ($4536, p < .01) or risperidone ($3813, p < .01).
Prevalent antipsychotic polypharmacy adds substantial cost to the treatment of schizophrenia. Comparison of medication costs need to address the costs of all antipsychotics. A better understanding of concomitant antipsychotic costs provides a more accurate portrayal of antipsychotic medication costs in the treatment of schizophrenia.

0 Followers
 · 
105 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeGiven the metabolic and neurologic side effects of antipsychotics and concerns about the increased risks associated with concomitant use, antipsychotic polypharmacy is a quality concern. This study assessed the operating characteristics of a Medicaid claims-based measure of antipsychotic polypharmacy. MethodsA random sample from 10 public mental health clinics and 312 patients met criteria for this study. Medical record extractors were blind to measure status. We examined the prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) in Medicaid claims, testing nine different definitions of antipsychotic polypharmacy, including >14, >60, or >90days concurrent use of 2 antipsychotic agents, each with allowable gaps of up to 0, 14, or 32days in days' supply of antipsychotic medications. ResultsAll Medicaid claims measure definitions tested had excellent specificity and PPV (>91%). Good to excellent sensitivity was dependent upon use of a 32-day gap allowance, particularly as duration of concurrent antipsychotic use increased. The proposed claims-based measure (90-day concurrent use of 2 or more antipsychotics, allowing for a 32-day gap) had excellent specificity (99.1%, 95%CI: 98.2-99.6) and PPV (90.9%, 95%CI: 83.1-95.7) with good sensitivity (79.4%, 95%CI: 70.4-86.6). The overall level of concordance between claims and medical record-based categorization of antipsychotic polypharmacy was high (96.4%, n=301/312 clients, Cohen's K=84.7, 95%CI: 75.9-93.5). Discrepant cases were reviewed, and implications are discussed. Conclusions Administrative claims data can be used to construct valid measures of antipsychotic polypharmacy. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 06/2014; 23(6). DOI:10.1002/pds.3609 · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: This study had two aims: to measure the prevalence of long-term prescribing of high doses of antipsychotics and antipsychotic polypharmacy in a large Canadian province and to estimate the relative contributions of patient-, physician-, and hospital-level factors. Methods: Government hospital discharge, physician, and pharmaceutical claims data were linked to identify individuals with schizophrenia who in 2004 had antipsychotics available to them for at least 11 months. Individuals on a high dose throughout that period, as well as individuals on multiple concurrent antipsychotics (polypharmacy), were identified. Logistic and generalized linear mixed models using patient-, physician-, and hospitallevel predictors were estimated. Results: Among the 12,150 individuals identified, 11.9% were on a high dose and 10.4% on antipsychotic polypharmacy continually, with 3.7% in both groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, analyses showed that systematic propensity for physicians to prescribe high doses accounted for 10.9% of the remaining unexplained variance, and physicians as a group who prescribed high doses across a hospital or psychiatry department accounted for 3.0%. For antipsychotic polypharmacy the corresponding percentages were 9.7% and 6.2%. Even after adjustment, the variation in high-dose prescribing and antipsychotic polypharmacy remained substantial. Conclusions: Long-term high-dose and antipsychotic polypharmacy prescribing appeared partly driven by some physicians' and some hospitals' propensities to prescribe in this way independently of patient characteristics. Given the weight of the evidence against high-dose prescribing and antipsychotic polypharmacy, measures addressed to physicians and hospitals most likely to prescribe high doses, antipsychotic polypharmacy, or both should be considered.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 07/2014; 65(10). DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201300217 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patterns of pharmacologic treatment in U.S. outpatients with schizophrenia across multiple health care settings were investigated. Antipsychotic drug utilization by patients with schizophrenia and related disorders was analyzed using data on 119,662 patients served by the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system in fiscal years 2005-09, data on 5,440 enrollees in two health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in 2002-09, and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data reflecting the experience of 17.6 million U.S. residents seeking care outside federal systems during the same eight-year period. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of more than one antipsychotic agent during one year (in the VA sample) or one week (in the HMO and NAMCS samples). The association of polypharmacy with hospital admissions was assessed via multivariable logistic regression. Rates of antipsychotic use in the VA sample ranged from 74% to 78%, with lower and more variable rates in the NAMCS sample (69-84%) and the HMO sample (22-67%). VA patients were found to have lower polypharmacy rates (20-22%) than patients in the HMO and NAMCS samples (19-31%). In all samples evaluated, polypharmacy was associated with an increased likelihood of hospital admission (odds ratio range, 1.4-2.4). A multisystem study revealed that antipsychotic use among patients with schizophrenia varied substantially among health care systems and that nearly one fifth of patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in most of the health care systems experienced antipsychotic polypharmacy.
    American journal of health-system pharmacy: AJHP: official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 05/2014; 71(9):728-38. DOI:10.2146/ajhp130471 · 2.21 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from