The Importance of Location for Tobacco Cessation: Rural-Urban Disparities in Quit Success in Underserved West Virginia Counties

Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
The Journal of Rural Health (Impact Factor: 1.45). 02/2008; 24(2):106-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00146.x
Source: PubMed


Adults who live in rural areas of the United States have among the highest smoking rates in the country. Rural populations, including Appalachian adults, have been historically underserved by tobacco control programs and policies and little is known about their effectiveness.
To examine the end-of-class quit success of participants in A Tobacco Cessation Project for Disadvantaged West Virginia Communities by place of residence (rural West Virginia and the urban area of Greater Charleston).
This collaborative program was implemented in 5 underserved rural counties in West Virginia and consisted of 4 intervention approaches: (1) a medical examination; (2) an 8-session educational and behavioral modification program; (3) an 8-week supply of pharmacotherapy; and (4) follow-up support group meetings.
Of the 725 program participants, 385 (53.1%) had successfully quit using tobacco at the last group cessation class they attended. Participants who lived in rural West Virginia counties had a lower end-of-class quit success rate than those who lived in the urban area of Greater Charleston (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]= 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.48, 0.99), even after taking into account other characteristics known to influence quit success (adjusted OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.94).
Tobacco control programs in rural West Virginia would do well to build upon the positive aspects of rural life while addressing the infrastructure and economic needs of the region. End-of-class quit success may usefully be viewed as a stage on the continuum of change toward long-term quit success.

Download full-text


Available from: Mary Evelyn Northridge, Jul 25, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Few studies have investigated supplement use in relation to smoking among men in a rural population. Methods: We analyzed responses about the use of supplements from a cross-sectional, population-based sample of 4,502 North Dakota men. Results: 48% of respondents reported supplement use. After adjustment for confounders, supplement users were significantly more likely to be nonsmokers or former smokers than smokers (p < .0001) and to consume five or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables (p = .0003). Conclusion: Compared to nonsmoking rural men, supplement use is significantly less common among rural smokers. Rural smokers also are less likely to consume five or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables and may be at greater risk of vitamin deficiency.
    Journal of Dietary Supplements 01/2009; 6(3):280-9. DOI:10.1080/19390210903149493
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smoking is common among medically underserved populations. Accessible resources to encourage and support smoking cessation among these patients are limited. Volunteer medical student-run free smoking cessation clinics may provide an effective option to help these individuals achieve smoking abstinence. In order to demonstrate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a student-run clinic, we analyzed a case series of patients receiving care in a medical student-run Smoking Cessation Clinic (SCC) at the Rochester, Minnesota Salvation Army Good Samaritan Health Clinic (GSHC). Between January 2005 and March 2009, 282 cigarette smokers seeking care at the SCC were analyzed. Student providers at the SCC conducted 1652 weekly individual counseling sessions averaging 18 minutes per encounter. Patients were offered a choice of pharmacotherapies including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, and varenicline for up to 12 weeks. Smoking abstinence was confirmed with exhaled carbon monoxide (CO). Thirty-two patients completed the entire 12-week program (11.3%). At last contact, 94 patients (33.3%) abstained from smoking for ≥ 7 days and 39 patients (13.8%) were continuously abstinent for ≥ 4 weeks. The 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at last contact were 58.6% for varenicline, 41.2% for bupropion, 33.9% for NRT, and 23.5% for bupropion and NRT. Analyzing missing patients as smoking, the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates were 7.1%, 8.9%, and 8.2%, at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after program enrollment, respectively. No serious adverse drug reactions were recorded. Our medical student-run smoking cessation clinic provided an effective and safe experience for medically underserved patients who might not otherwise have access to conventional smoking cessation programs because of high cost, lack of insurance, or other disparities. Similar medical student initiatives focusing on healthy lifestyles may be feasible and beneficial for individuals with limited access to healthcare resources.
    BMC Research Notes 03/2011; 4(1):55. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-4-55
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services in the United States are underutilized and participation is particularly low for racial and ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic status patients, and rural residents. Reduced participation may not only indicate a failure in transitional cardiac care during the in hospital referral process but also could be due to barriers attributed to patients, providers, employers, or medical systems. In-depth analysis of this problem is impeded by difficulties with the identification of underserved groups in clinical settings. Disparities in CR participation certainly contribute to poor medical outcomes in these populations that stand to benefit greatly from lifestyle modifications. It is critical that CR providers survey their communities for underserved populations and coordinate creative efforts aimed at overcoming barriers to participation. Moreover, it is likely that referral to, and participation in, CR will soon be considered a quality indicator, providing further incentive for programs to optimize CR utilization among all eligible patients.
    Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention 06/2011; 31(4):203-10. DOI:10.1097/HCR.0b013e318220a7da · 1.58 Impact Factor
Show more