Article

Lentigo maligna in a young adult

Pathologic Anatomy Unit, Gaetano Rummo General Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Dermatology (Impact Factor: 1.69). 02/2008; 217(1):66-8. DOI: 10.1159/000125549
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Lentigo maligna is mainly diagnosed in the elderly with severely sun-damaged skin.
We describe a case of lentigo maligna in a 51-year-old woman with Fitzpatrick skin type III. Based on private photographs of the patient, we were able to ascertain that the lesion was already present at the age of 22 years. Despite the 29-year clinical history, the lesion was still entirely intraepidermal on histologic examination.
Lentigo maligna in young adults is extremely rare, and therefore represents a diagnostic challenge for both clinicians and histopathologists.

0 Followers
 · 
64 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of lentigo maligna (LM) is often challenging for both clinicians and pathologists. LM is widely regarded as a form of melanoma in situ occurring in severely sun-damaged skin with characteristic clinical and pathologic features. However, compared with other forms of in situ melanoma, it often has a long-term clinical course for evolution to invasive melanoma. Some authorities advocate dividing LM into premalignant/precursor and in situ melanoma (LM in situ melanoma) phases, implying a lesser risk of the former for developing invasive melanoma. However, this subtle morphologic distinction does not necessarily correlate well with clinical outcome. An initial tissue sample for histologic diagnosis is commonly a small proportion of the lesion and may not be representative/diagnostic of LM. New clinical diagnostic tools including dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy have improved the accuracy of both clinical diagnosis of LM and also defining the peripheral extent of the lesion for definitive treatment. In this review, the authors discuss these challenges and controversies in LM and provide recommendations for clinicopathologic diagnosis and management.
    Expert Review of Dermatology 04/2013; 8(2):195-214. DOI:10.1586/edm.13.17
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The clinical recognition of lentigo maligna (LM) in the mottled chronic sun-damaged skin can be challenging, because it shares many clinical features with other pigmented macules that commonly arise on sun-damaged skin. These include solar lentigo, flat seborrheic keratosis, and pigmented actinic keratosis, but almost never "nevus." The reason nevus is not included in the differential diagnosis of LM can be explained by the fact that the stereotypical appearance of a facial nevus differs remarkably from that of an LM. Facial nevi in adults are usually nodular, dome-shaped, well-defined, and hypopigmented (ie, intradermal nevus of the Miescher type), whereas LM typically appears as a flat, ill-defined, and pigmented macule. Although this concept based on clinical observations sounds reasonable, clinicians apply it often only unconsciously and accept a given histopathologic diagnosis of a "junctional or lentiginous nevus" of a flat pigmented facial macule without the necessary criticism about its clinicopathologic validity.
    Clinics in dermatology 01/2014; 32(1):88-93. DOI:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.029 · 1.93 Impact Factor