Article

Health plans target advanced imaging services: cost, quality and safety concerns prompt renewed oversight.

Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change) 03/2008;
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Faced with double-digit annual increases in the use of advanced imaging services, health plans are stepping up efforts to manage imaging utilization, maintain imaging quality and ensure patient safety, according to findings from the Center for Studying Health System Change's (HSC) 2007 site visits to 12 nationally representative metropolitan communities. Plan strategies range from informing physicians about evidence-based imaging guidelines to requiring prior authorization of services to credentialing physicians and imaging equipment. Mindful of the physician backlash against managed care in the 1990s, plans are instituting requirements they perceive to be less intrusive and burdensome for physicians. Some physicians, however, view the requirements as administratively onerous and obstacles to patient care. Depending on the experience with imaging, plans may expand utilization management to other services with rapid volume increases.

0 Followers
 · 
79 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few standards exist for reporting results of voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG).
    Pediatric Radiology 05/2014; 44(12). DOI:10.1007/s00247-014-3028-7 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Self-referrals, or the practice of referring patients to an entity for ancillary services in which physicians have a financial interest, give physicians a moral hazard incentive to order more services than necessary. The Stark Law was passed to control potential abuse from self-referrals by prohibiting physician referrals of Medicare and Medicaid patients to ancillary care facilities in which the physicians or members of the physician's group have a financial interest. However, regulations like Stark Law typically have ―safe harbor‖ exceptions that allow physicians to escape regulatory prohibition if the referral is made within physician offices for ―in office ancillary services‖ or to a ―bona fide employee.‖ This draws a distinction between permissible referrals made within an integrated firm and impermissible referrals made to outside entities. In this paper, we investigate the impact of a Stark-Law like policy in Taiwan prohibiting physicians from dispensing drugs from physician-owned unless the physician has an onsite pharmacist employed by her group. We find that policy reduced drug expenditures by close to 30 percent among physicians that did not have an onsite pharmacist. However, these physicians responded by increasing the overprovision of diagnostic services not covered by the policy, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the policy. In addition, more than half of the physician groups already had an onsite pharmacist prior to the policy and therefore were exempt. And 45 percent of the clinics that did not have an onsite pharmacist prior to the policy hired one subsequent to the implementation of the policy. Overall, after integration, the policy only applied to only 17% of clinics, and only reduced average discretionary expenditures by about 2.5 percent. Our results show that moral hazard costs of self-referral incentives are large, that the ―safe harbor‖ exemption severely reduces the effectiveness of the policy, and that the exemption explains much of the recent integration of ancillary services into physician offices.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cultural competence advances global healthcare by promoting greater understanding of individual patients, combined interventions, and maximum adherence. However, the healthcare professional's culture and the culture of medicine itself must also be considered. In westernized medicine, especially America, improved technology and therapeutics profoundly impact medical culture; but medical economics is as significant. Managed care and Medicare Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) strongly affect American medical economics with resultant decreased physicians' incomes, increased patient volumes, decreased time spent with each patient, and decreased subjective/objective quality of care. Physicians' roles blur with duties delegated to lesser qualified healthcare professionals to maximize patients seen and generated incomes. In psychiatry, performing multiple psychopharmacology visits hourly is economically more productive than an hour therapy session. Doctors need to understand that in entering medicine they enter a life's career of nobility in which they serve others, do not expect to become wealthy, but at life's end are able to state "a job well done with caring for all." Perhaps then, less harm will be done to patients in doctors' haste to earn more money by seeing too many patients too briefly. Groups of doctors jammed into elevators maddeningly looking at their lists, checking off those seen and yet to be seen and occasionally looking up toward a colleague and bemoaning how many more consults to be done before the end of the day. When did doctoring stop being a noble profession of caring for others, of having time to care for others, and change so dramatically into making sure that all those who could be billed in a given day were seen and then billed for maximum charges? In retrospect, one could argue that we as physicians sold our souls to the insurance companies and that over the years the insurance companies realized their power, and having done such also realized that they controlled how much doctors were paid and even if services should be authorized [1]. Managed care companies now manage not only the health of patients but also physicians' lives. With decreased professional autonomy, managed care is associa-ted with decreased physician career satisfaction [2]. Authorization must be obtained not simply for admission to a hospital, but for outpatient procedures, for specific medications, and even for dosage of medications [1, 3-5]. Often these authorizations are obtained from individuals with no knowledge of the procedure or medication but reading from a handbook stating what should or should not be approved and taking valuable time from patient care for administrative tasks.
    The Open Social Science Journal 10/2008; 1(1). DOI:10.2174/1874945300801010001