Article

Anthropometric Characteristics of Ultramarathoners

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 10535 Hospital Way (117), Sacramento, California 95655-1200, United States.
International Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.37). 04/2008; 29(10):808-11. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038434
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Little is known about the anthropometric characteristics of ultramarathon runners. The present work reports on the physical characteristics of the 392 (310 males, 82 females) starters and 270 (216 males, 54 females) finishers of the 2007 Western States Endurance Run, one of the largest 161-km trail runs in North America. Among the starters, mean (and 25th to 75th percentiles) body mass index (BMI) values were 23.2 (21.6 - 24.6) and 20.6 (19.4 - 21.9) kg . m (-2) for the men and women, respectively. Men were significantly taller, heavier and had greater BMI's across all age groups compared with the women. Among the top-5 overall finishers, mean BMI values were 23.2 (range 22.4 - 24.7) for the men and 19.8 (range 17.3 - 21.1) for the women. Average running speed and BMI were negatively correlated for both men (r (2) = 0.11, p < 0.0001) and women (r (2) = 0.10, p = 0.02). From this analysis, it is concluded that those participating in ultramarathon runs can vary widely in physical characteristics with BMI values that would classify some individuals as underweight and others as overweight. BMI varied considerably even among the top finishers, but lower BMI values were associated with faster running times.

1 Follower
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A variety of anthropometric and training characteristics have been identified as predictor variables for race performance in endurance and ultra-endurance athletes. Anthropometric characteristics such as skin-fold thicknesses, body fat, circumferences and length of limbs, body mass, body height, and body mass index were bi-variately related to race performance in endurance athletes such as swimmers in pools and in open water, in road and mountain bike cyclists, and in runners and triathletes over different distances. Additionally, training variables such as volume and speed were also bi-variately associated with race performance. Multi-variate regression analyses including anthropometric and training characteristics reduced the predictor variables mainly to body fat and speed during training units. Further multi-variate regression analyses including additionally the aspects of previous experience such as personal best times showed that mainly previous best time in shorter races were the most important predictors for ultra-endurance race times. Ultra-endurance athletes seemed to prepare differently for their races compared to endurance athletes where ultra-endurance athletes invested more time in training and completed more training kilometers at lower speed compared to endurance athletes. In conclusion, the most important predictor variables for ultra-endurance athletes were a fast personal best time in shorter races, a low body fat and a high speed during training units.
    06/2014; 5(2):73-90.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Marathon (42 km) and 100 km ultramarathon races are increasing in popularity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential associations of anthropometric and training variables with performance in these long-distance running competitions. Methods: Training and anthropometric data from a large cohort of marathoners and 100 km ultramarathoners provided the basis of this work. Correlations between training and anthropometric indices of subjects and race performance were assessed using bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Results: A combination of volume and intensity in training was found to be suitable for prediction of marathon and 100 km ultramarathon race pace. The relative role played by these two variables was different, in that training volume was more important than training pace for the prediction of 100 km ultramarathon performance, while the opposite was found for marathon performance. Anthropometric characteristics in terms of body fat percentage negatively affected 42 km and 100 km race performance. However, when this factor was relatively low (ie, less than 15% body fat), the performance of 42 km and 100 km races could be predicted solely on the basis of training indices. Conclusion: Mean weekly training distance run and mean training pace were key predictor variables for both marathon and 100 km ultramarathon race performance. Predictive correlations for race performance are provided for runners with a relatively low body fat percentage.
    Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 04/2015; 6. DOI:10.2147/OAJSM.S80637
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated the association of anthropometric, training, physiological and psychological variables with race performance in a 7-day running stage race. Participants: 12 recreational runners 49.6 +/- 6.8 years (mean +/- SD), 75.1 +/- 13.3 kg, 177.0 +/- 7.0 cm, body mass index value 23.8 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2). Methods: Questionnaires and physiological measurements. Results: We found the significant pre race minus post race difference in body mass (Delta) and the post race minus pre race difference (Delta) in a rating of perceived exertion. In contrast no significant correlations were between select variables and race time. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huseyin Uzunboylu
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 12/2012; 46:2362-2366. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.485