Complications and Risk Factors for Failure of Rotationplasty: Review of 25 Patients

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.88). 07/2008; 466(6):1302-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0231-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rotationplasty is one treatment option for femoral bone sarcomas in skeletally immature patients. This procedure enables patients to avoid phantom pain, limb length discrepancy, or loosening of an endoprosthesis, and good functional outcome has been reported. However, rotationplasty is only rarely indicated and the surgical complications or risk factors for failure of the procedure that might influence choices of treatment or patient counseling have not been well described. We reviewed 25 patients who underwent rotationplasty focusing on risk factors for failure and postoperative complications. Three of 25 patients had vascular compromise resulting in amputation. All three had vascular anastomosis and were resistant to chemotherapy with less than 95% of tumor necrosis. Two of the three patients who underwent amputation had a pathologic fracture before surgery. Late complications included one patient with a tibial fracture, two with wound complications treated with skin grafts, one with nonunion, and one with subsequent slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Rotationplasty was successfully accomplished in 22 of the 25 patients. Patients with large tumors unresponsive to chemotherapy or preoperative pathologic fracture appear at higher risk for failure of rotationplasty presumably as a result of compromise of venous drainage of the leg. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lack of education, coupled with apathy, socioeconomic conditions, the need to travel vast geographical distances to access health care, reliance on alternate medical practices, and a shortage of trained orthopaedic oncologists all contribute to late presentations of malignant bone tumors in the developing world. Balancing the two opposing goals of ensuring adequate resection of involved bone and soft tissue so as to minimize the chance of local recurrence while yet preserving adequate function of the limb after reconstruction often can be a challenge, especially in patients with large tumors. In a resource-challenged setting, the ingenuity of the treating team often is tested when deciding on reconstruction modalities, resulting in more inexpensive and locally applicable solutions for limb salvage as compared with conventional modalities. This article seeks to illustrate some such options for limb salvage in late presenting or large malignant bone tumors.
    Current Orthopaedic Practice 01/2013; 24(1):5-10. DOI:10.1097/BCO.0b013e31827bc17a
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rotationplasty is used most often as a function-preserving salvage procedure after resection of sarcomas of the lower extremity; however, it is also used after infection of prosthetic knee joints. Conventional vascular management during rotationplasty is to preserve and coil major vessels, but recently, transection and reanastomosis of the major vessels has been widely performed. However, there has been little discussion regarding the optimal vascular management of rotationplasty after infection of prosthetic knee joints because rotationplasty is rarely performed for this indication. We reviewed four patients who had undergone resection of osteosarcomas of the femur, placement of a prosthetic knee joint, and rotationplasty with vascular reconstruction from 2010 to 2013. The mean interval between prosthetic joint replacement and rotationplasty was 10.4 years and the mean interval between the diagnosis of prosthesis infection and rotationplasty was 7.9 years. Rotationplasty was successful in all patients; however, in one patient, arterial thrombosis developed and necessitated urgent surgical removal and arterial reconstruction. All patients were able to walk independently with a prosthetic limb after rehabilitation. Although there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate method of vascular management during rotationplasty for revision of infected prosthetic joints, vascular transection and reanastomosis is a useful option.
    01/2015; 2015:241405. DOI:10.1155/2015/241405
  • Current Orthopaedic Practice 01/2014; DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000000164


1 Download
Available from