Enquiring minds want to know: Topics requested by users of a children's health information website

UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Patient Education and Counseling (Impact Factor: 2.2). 08/2008; 72(1):168-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.014
Source: PubMed


To investigate health information needs of users of a health information website for children and young people.
A prospective analysis was conducted of unsolicited information requests to the Children First for Health ( website, an NHS-run health and hospital online information resource for children, young people and families. All specific and general enquiries were recorded prospectively and coded according to health topic, age of the enquirer and web pages accessed.
There were 2865 (62%) general health information and 924 (21%) specific enquiries received over an 18-month period (6.3 enquiries per day). More general enquiries were received about adolescent (64%) than children's (36%) health issues. The most common topics were psychosocial issues, hospital and health services, and normal growth and development. Only 1% of requests for information related to smoking, alcohol and drugs.
Children and adolescents are active users of the Internet for health information. The results of this study highlight the health topics that are of greatest interest to children and young people.
The findings provide objective data on health information topics of interest to UK children and young people and can be used to guide development of health information aimed at UK youth.

10 Reads
  • The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology, 11/2009: pages 355 - 372; , ISBN: 9781444314786
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Statistical risk models hold substantial promise for the practice of cancer prevention by helping to identify high risk populations and subsequently guide decisions about surveillance, further testing and treatments. They have come under criticism for creating new categories of disease-free but ‘at risk’ individuals. We analysed the debate over the interpretation of risk estimates to assess the importance of these models for the practice of cancer prevention. In particular, we focused on the Gail model for breast cancer risk assessment as a case study, because it is widely used and has been promoted directly to consumers. We describe the critiques that have been offered of the Gail model for individualised risk assessment, such as that classification of a new ‘high risk’ category may increase the use of medical intervention in otherwise healthy individuals. We then analyse the primary methodological limitations of individualised risk models, which are often overlooked in the application of these models and interpretation of their results. In particular, the application of statistical risk models like the Gail model to individuals fails to acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding estimates of individual risk. Moreover, putting the focus of risk management at the individual level minimises the influence of important environmental factors on risk, such as social influences and policies that may impact behaviour or outcomes. Overall, the increasing use of individualised risk estimates for individual decision-making may obscure the fact that successful disease prevention requires intervention on all levels, including the political, social, economic and individual level.
    Health Risk & Society 10/2010; 12(5):441-452. DOI:10.1080/13698575.2010.508835 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study is to assess the use of a web-based tool to calculate the 5-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, the German Diabetes Risk Score (DRS), in a real-life setting. Recorded web server log information and user entered data (n=24,495) was analyzed. To distinguish information seeking behavior between high- and low-risk DRS records, a sub-sample was created to compare data entries of the highest and lowest risk quintile (n=5046). To learn more on the information seeking behavior of DRS users we created a dataset on the characteristics of those who calculate more than one DRS (n=11,902). Most users (61%) entered the DRS without a referring website. Forty percent of users did not know their waist circumference. Visit duration among high-risk DRS records was almost 1.5 min longer compared to low-risk DRS records (p-value<0.001). Those who calculated multiple DRS were associated with a higher first DRS and male gender. Understanding users' website utilization is an important step to evaluate risk calculator websites. A range of media should be used conjointly to raise type 2 diabetes mellitus risk awareness. Risk websites should be linked to patient information pages.
    Patient Education and Counseling 04/2011; 83(1):106-12. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.021 · 2.20 Impact Factor
Show more