Treatment of advanced-stage Kienböck's disease with proximal row carpectomy: an average 15-year follow-up.

Hand and Upper Extremity Center of Northeast Wisconsin, Appleton, WI, USA.
The Journal Of Hand Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.57). 05/2008; 33(4):493-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical results of a proximal row carpectomy with an average 15-year follow-up for the primary treatment of advanced-stage (Lichtman IIIA and IIIB) Kienböck's disease. This study is a follow-up to a paper by the senior author in a similar cohort of patients where the clinical results of a proximal row carpectomy were evaluated for the treatment of advanced-stage Kienböck's disease at an average 3-year follow-up.
Seventeen patients with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up were identified who met criteria for inclusion. Thirteen of these patients were located and agreed to participate. Patients were seen, examined, and queried regarding their wrists. Range of motion, grip strength, and subjective patient satisfaction were all obtained and quantified using a clinical outcomes scale.
Twelve of 13 patients demonstrated excellent or good results based on the clinical outcomes scale used (5 excellent, 7 good, 1 fair, and none poor). Total arc of motion averaged 73% of the uninvolved side. Grip strength averaged 92% of the uninvolved side. Compared with preoperative values, range of motion improved an average of 16% and grip strength improved an average of 129%, an overall average improvement of 12 degrees and 18 kg, respectively. At the most recent follow-up, all patients remained employed. Seven patients held manual labor positions, 2 were nurses, and 4 were employed in sedentary vocations. All patients demonstrated some degree of degenerative changes, usually localized to the radiocapitate articulation in the lunate fossa. Clinical results did not correlate with radiographic degeneration.
This study demonstrates proximal row carpectomy to be a reliable motion-preserving procedure with good clinical results maintained out to an average of 15 years postoperatively.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Proximal row carpectomy is a well-established technique for the management of wrist arthritis; however, patient selection and long-term durability of proximal row carpectomy is still a matter of controversy. Hence, we conducted a systematic review of the English literature to determine the best evidence on long-term outcomes following proximal row carpectomy. Methods A MEDLINE search using the term "proximal row carpectomy" was performed. A total of 192 studies were identified. All studies with 10 or more years of follow-up were included in the review. Data extracted included patient demographics, indications for surgery, previous surgery, outcome assessment, and information on complications and failures. Results A total of 147 patients from six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The majority of patients were male and involved in manual labor. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and long-term postoperative motion. The weighted mean for postoperative grip strength was 68.4% compared with the contralateral side. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand; patient-rated wrist examination; and Mayo wrist scores were comparable to those reported for four-corner arthrodesis. There were 21 failures (14.3%) requiring re-operation. Failures were not associated with a specific preoperative diagnosis but distributed among patients with Kienböck disease, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, and scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis. Conclusions This systematic review confirms the long-term durability of proximal row carpectomy when used for the treatment of wrist arthritis. Although radiocapitate arthritis develops over time in most patients, the clinical significance of this finding is undetermined and does not necessarily correlate with failure of proximal row carpectomy. Poorer long-term outcomes are likely to result in patients engaged in heavy manual labor, whereas better outcomes may be obtained in patients undergoing proximal row carpectomy for trauma or earlier-stage Kienböck disease.
    Journal of wrist surgery. 11/2012; 1(2):141-8.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advanced stages of Kienböck's disease are treated by several techniques, one of which is Graner's procedure, nearly abandoned nowadays. The results of long-term follow-up of a series of four cases Graner's procedure are presented. Four patients were reviewed with a follow-up of 25years. There were two women and two men mean aged 37years at the time of surgery. Two of them were manual workers. Graner's procedure was the first surgery in three cases and secondary to failure of radius shortening in one case of Stage IIIa. Three patients underwent bone healing and the fourth benefited secondarily from radiocarpal arthrodesis. At maximal follow-up, the mean DASH score was 36.6 and pain assessed by visual analogic scale was 3.25 out of 10; the range of movement was half of the opposite side; the wrist strength was 80.9% of the opposite side. In the three consolidated cases, a spontaneous remodeling of the radiocarpal articular surfaces was noted. Graner's procedure is logical as it aims at creating a new radiocarpal articulation, either by the fusion of the lunate with the capitate (Graner I) or by replacing the lunate with the head of the capitate (Graner II and III). However, this old procedure should no longer be one of the surgical procedures for Kienböck disease due to its drawbacks: necrosis or non-union of the head of the capitate, necessity to perform a wrist fusion in the long-term and side effects of bone graft harvesting. II. Retrospective study.
    Chirurgie de la Main 08/2013; · 0.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is an established surgical procedure used to treat post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the wrist with sparing of the midcarpal joint and advanced aseptic necrosis such as lunatomalacia. Proximalization of the distal carpal row following PRC may lead to secondary problems such as radiocarpal impingement. At follow-up, two of our patients complained about ulnar-sided wrist pain after proximal row carpectomy. Computed tomography (CT) scans were taken for both patients with an additional magnetic resonance imaging scan for one patient. The CT scan revealed clear osteolysis consistent with a pisiform bone impingement on the ulnar styloid process in both the cases, and also on the hamate in one patient. An impingement syndrome of this nature has not previously been described and should be kept in mind when patients report ulnocarpal symptoms after PRC.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 04/2014; · 1.36 Impact Factor