Article

Impact of state and trait anxiety on the panic response to CCK-4.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.
Journal of Neural Transmission (Impact Factor: 2.87). 07/2008; 115(6):917-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-008-0047-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In order to elucidate the impact of psychological factors on panic severity the correlation between baseline anxiety and panic response to cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4), an established model of human anxiety, was investigated in 33 healthy volunteers. Baseline anxiety was assessed with the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI). Trait and state anxiety did not differ between panickers and nonpanickers nor were they correlated with panic severity. In conclusion, psychological factors are not major determinants for the subjective panic response to CCK-4 thus emphasising the importance of neurobiological factors.

0 Followers
 · 
95 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) is a method to study effects of psychopharmacological agents on neural activation. Changes of the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD), the basis of functional MRI (fMRI), are typically obtained at relatively high sampling frequencies. This has more recently been exploited in the field of fMRI by applying independent component analysis (ICA), an explorative data analysis method decomposing activation into distinct neural networks. While already successfully used to investigate resting network and task-induced activity, its use in phMRI is new. Further extension of this method to tensorial probabilistic ICA (tensor PICA) allows to group similar brain activation across the anatomical, temporal, subject or session domain. This approach is useful for pharmacological experiments when no pharmacokinetic model exists. We exemplify this method using data from a placebo-controlled cholecystokinine-4 (CCK-4) injection experiment performed on 16 neuropsychiatrically and medically healthy males (age 25.6 +/- 4.2 years). Tensor PICA identified strong increases in activity in 12 networks. Comparison with results gained from the standard approach (voxelwise regression analysis) revealed good reproduction of areas previously associated with CCK-4 action, such as the anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal cortex, cerebellum, temporolateral, left parietal and insular areas, striatum, and precuneus. Several other components such as the dorsal anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex were identified, suggesting higher sensitivity of the method. Exploration of the time courses of each activated network revealed differences, that might be lost when a fixed time course is modeled, e. g. neuronal responses to an acoustic warning signal prior to injection. Comparison of placebo and CCK-4 runs further showed that a proportion of networks are newly elicited by CCK-4 whereas other components are significantly active in the placebo conditions but further enhanced by CCK-4. In conclusion, group ICA is a promising tool for phMRI studies that allows quantifying and visualizing the modulation of neural networks by pharmacological interventions.
    Current pharmaceutical design 02/2008; 14(33):3492-507. DOI:10.2174/138161208786848801 · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study we examined how personality disposition may affect the response to cholecystokinin tetrapeptide (CCK-4; 50 microg) challenge in healthy volunteers (n=105). Personality traits were assessed with the Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP). Statistical methods employed were correlation analysis and logistic regression. The results showed that the occurrence of CCK-4-induced panic attacks was best predicted by baseline diastolic blood pressure, preceding anxiety and SSP-defined traits of lack of assertiveness, detachment, embitterment and verbal aggression. Significant interactions were noted between the above mentioned variables, modifying their individual effects. For different subsets of CCK-4-induced symptoms, the traits of physical aggression, irritability, somatic anxiety and stress susceptibility also appeared related to panic manifestations. These findings suggest that some personality traits and their interactions may influence vulnerability to CCK-4-induced panic attacks in healthy volunteers.
    Psychiatry Research 07/2010; 178(2):342-7. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.003 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is evidence that the anti-glycation enzyme glyoxalase-1 (GLO1) may play a role in anxiety-related behaviour. However, discordant findings between GLO1 expression and anxiety-related behaviour have been observed in animal models. Because no data are available on the relation between GLO1 mRNA expression and human anxiety so far, we investigated the expression of GLO1 mRNA in peripheral blood cells in relation to cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) induced panic anxiety in healthy subjects as an established model of human anxiety in healthy volunteers. Twenty-three healthy subjects underwent challenge with CCK-4. GLO1 mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction prior to CCK-4 injection. Baseline anxiety was assessed with the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI) and panic response was measured with the Panic Symptom Scale (PSS). CCK-4 elicited a marked anxiety response accompanied by a significant increase in heart rate. GLO1 mRNA expression did not correlate with state or trait anxiety nor with severity of CCK-4 induced anxiety. The lack of correlation between GLO1 mRNA expression and CCK-4 induced panic severity suggests that GLO1 is not involved into the acute panic response to CCK-4 in healthy volunteers. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the involvement of GLO1 in anxiety disorders at baseline and in anxiety challenge paradigms to resolve the apparent contradictions of preclinical studies concerning the relationship between GLO1 expression and anxiety.
    Journal of Psychiatric Research 01/2011; 45(1):60-3. DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.008 · 4.09 Impact Factor