MacPherson P, McGaffigan R, Wahlsten D, Nguyen PV. Impaired fear memory, altered object memory and modified hippocampal synaptic plasticity in split-brain mice. Brain Res 1210: 179-188

University of Alberta School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7.
Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.84). 06/2008; 1210:179-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.008
Source: PubMed


The hippocampus is critical for memory formation. However, the contributions of the hippocampal commissure (HC) and the corpus callosum (CC) are less clear. To elucidate the role of the forebrain commissures in learning and memory, we performed a behavioural and electrophysiological characterization of an inbred mouse strain that displays agenesis of the CC and congenitally reduced HC (BTBR T+ tf/J; 'BTBR'). Compared to a control strain, BTBR mice have severely impaired contextual fear memory, with normal object recognition memory. Interestingly, continuous environmental "enrichment" significantly increased object recognition in BTBR, but not in control C57BL/6 ('BL/6') mice. In area CA1 of hippocampal slices, BTBR displayed intact expression of long-term potentiation (LTP), paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) and basal synaptic transmission, compared to BL/6 mice. However, BTBR hippocampal slices show an increased susceptibility to depotentiation (DPT), an activity-induced reversal of LTP. We conclude that the HC and CC are critical for some forms of hippocampal memory and for synaptic resistance to DPT. Agenesis of the CC and HC may unmask some latent ability to encode, store or retrieve certain forms of recognition memory. We suggest that the increased susceptibility to DPT in BTBR may underlie the memory phenotype reported here.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "In mice 40 days post-injury, we found elevated levels of activated microglia in the corpus callosum as assessed by Iba1 immunoreactivity. The corpus callosum carries interhemispheric connections that are important for the processing of social and emotional information in humans [38,39], and loss of the corpus callosum in mice impacts emotional memory more than object memory [40]. Iba1 positive cells were elevated in the corpus callosum of rcTBI injured animals compared to shams, regardless of their shock stress status. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The debilitating effects of repetitive concussive traumatic brain injury (rcTBI) have been increasingly recognized in both military and civilian populations. rcTBI may result in significant neurological, cognitive, and affective sequelae, and is often followed by physical and/or psychological post-injury stressors that may exacerbate the effects of the injury and prolong the recovery period for injured patients. However, the consequences of post-injury stressors and their subsequent effects on social and emotional behavior in the context of rcTBI have been relatively little studied in animal models. Here, we use a mouse model of rcTBI with two closed-skull blunt impacts 24 hours apart and social and emotional behavior testing to examine the consequences of a stressor (foot shock fear conditioning) following brain injury (rcTBI). rcTBI alone did not affect cued or contextual fear conditioning or extinction compared to uninjured sham animals. In the sucrose preference test, rcTBI animals had decreased preference for sucrose, an anhedonia-like behavior, regardless of whether they experienced foot shock stress or were non-shocked controls. However, rcTBI and post-injury foot shock stress had synergistic effects in tests of social recognition and depression-like behavior. In the social recognition test, animals with both injury and shock were more impaired than either non-shocked injured mice or shocked but uninjured mice. In the tail suspension test, injured mice had increased depression-like behavior compared with uninjured mice, and shock stress worsened the depression-like behavior only in the injured mice with no effect in the uninjured mice. These results provide a model of subtle emotional behavioral deficits after combined concussive brain injury and stress, and may provide a platform for testing treatment and prevention strategies for social behavior deficits and mood disorders that are tailored to patients with traumatic brain injury.
    PLoS ONE 09/2013; 8(9):e74510. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0074510 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Deficits in fear conditioning have been consistently noted in several rodent models of autism, including the vasoactive intestinal peptide knockout mice [10], prenatal exposure to valproic acid mouse model [21], and the BTBR inbred strain[20] [41]. However, there are two conflicting reports of Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning humans with ASD in the normal IQ range, either no differences were discovered [1] or there were differences in the amplitude and timing of the conditioned response [33]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The BTBR T+tf/J (BTBR) strain of mice is a model for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs). These mice display reduced social behavior, altered communication, and high levels of repetitive behavior. BTBR mice have shown a deficit in learning cued and contextual fear conditioning. In this study, experiments were conducted to determine if either changes in training or drug administration would improve learning in BTBR mice when compared to C57BL/6 (B6) mice in contextual and cued fear conditioning. The first experiment examined the effects of three conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) training paradigms; a 1P (1 CS-US pairing), 4P (4 CS-US pairings), and 10P (10 CS-US pairings). Increasing the number of CS-US pairings to 10 caused an increase in freezing behavior by the BTBR mice in contextual and cued conditioning indicating that more training facilitated BTBR learning. B6 mice had a more complex reaction to the increased training; the mice increased freezing behavior in the cued fear conditioning but not contextual fear conditioning. The second experiment determined whether atomoxetine, a noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor that has been shown to improve attention and decrease hyperactivity, impulsivity, and social withdrawal, would enhance learning. There was a significant increase in freezing behavior in contextual fear conditioning following atomoxetine administration in BTBR mice but not in B6 mice. Our data demonstrates that contextual and cued learning in BTBR mice is facilitated by increased training. Furthermore, contextual learning is improved in BTBR mice with use of atomoxetine, which helps to improve attention. Both increased training and pharmacological intervention improved learning in the BTBR mice suggesting a role for the combination of the two.
    Neuroscience Letters 07/2013; 549. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.06.032 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Reversal learning deficits also feature in human patients with schizophrenia [58] as well as in mouse models for autism and schizophrenia [41], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65]. Similarly, contextual and cue fear conditioning deficits in GluD1 knockout mice also occur in mice models implicated in ASDs and schizophrenia [61], [62], [66], [67], [68] and may represent impaired conditioned association in schizophrenic and ASD individuals [69], [70], [71], [72]. Interestingly, GluD1 knockout mouse manifested an enhanced working memory. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glutamate delta-1 (GluD1) receptors are expressed throughout the forebrain during development with high levels in the hippocampus during adulthood. We have recently shown that deletion of GluD1 receptor results in aberrant emotional and social behaviors such as hyperaggression and depression-like behaviors and social interaction deficits. Additionally, abnormal expression of synaptic proteins was observed in amygdala and prefrontal cortex of GluD1 knockout mice (GluD1 KO). However the role of GluD1 in learning and memory paradigms remains unknown. In the present study we evaluated GluD1 KO in learning and memory tests. In the eight-arm radial maze GluD1 KO mice committed fewer working memory errors compared to wildtype mice but had normal reference memory. Enhanced working memory in GluD1 KO was also evident by greater percent alternation in the spontaneous Y-maze test. No difference was observed in object recognition memory in the GluD1 KO mice. In the Morris water maze test GluD1 KO mice showed no difference in acquisition but had longer latency to find the platform in the reversal learning task. GluD1 KO mice showed a deficit in contextual and cue fear conditioning but had normal latent inhibition. The deficit in contextual fear conditioning was reversed by D-Cycloserine (DCS) treatment. GluD1 KO mice were also found to be more sensitive to foot-shock compared to wildtype. We further studied molecular changes in the hippocampus, where we found lower levels of GluA1, GluA2 and GluK2 subunits while a contrasting higher level of GluN2B in GluD1 KO. Additionally, we found higher postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) and lower glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) expression in GluD1 KO. We propose that GluD1 is crucial for normal functioning of synapses and absence of GluD1 leads to specific abnormalities in learning and memory. These findings provide novel insights into the role of GluD1 receptors in the central nervous system.
    PLoS ONE 04/2013; 8(4):e60785. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0060785 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more