Weekly Paclitaxel in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Philadelphia, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 04/2008; 358(16):1663-71. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707056
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared the efficacy of two different taxanes, docetaxel and paclitaxel, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
We enrolled 4950 women with axillary lymph node-positive or high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer. After randomization, all patients first received 4 cycles of intravenous doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide at 3-week intervals and were then assigned to intravenous paclitaxel or docetaxel given at 3-week intervals for 4 cycles or at 1-week intervals for 12 cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival.
As compared with patients receiving standard therapy (paclitaxel every 3 weeks), the odds ratio for disease-free survival was 1.27 among those receiving weekly paclitaxel (P=0.006), 1.23 among those receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks (P=0.02), and 1.09 among those receiving weekly docetaxel (P=0.29) (with an odds ratio >1 favoring the groups receiving experimental therapy). As compared with standard therapy, weekly paclitaxel was also associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 1.32; P=0.01). An exploratory analysis of a subgroup of patients whose tumors expressed no human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 protein found similar improvements in disease-free and overall survival with weekly paclitaxel treatment, regardless of hormone-receptor expression. Grade 2, 3, or 4 neuropathy was more frequent with weekly paclitaxel than with paclitaxel every 3 weeks (27% vs. 20%).
Weekly paclitaxel after standard adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves disease-free and overall survival in women with breast cancer. ( number, NCT00004125 [].).

Download full-text


Available from: William C Wood, Mar 26, 2014
  • Source
    • "They concluded that the group receiving weekly paclitaxel had significantly more moderate-to-severe neuropathy than the group receiving standard therapy which was consistent with our results. Moreover, the group receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks showed significantly more severe neutropenia and its associated complications which were more frequent in docetaxel group than paclitaxel [5]. Ishikawa and colleagues evaluated the feasibility of AC/EC every three weeks followed by weekly paclitaxel or four cycles of three consecutive weekly administration followed by a one-week rest (3 × 4) and reported during AC/EC, (68%) of patients developed grade 3/4 granulocytopenia, compared to (7.8%) receiving 12 PAC and (2.1%) receiving 3 × 4 PAC. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Adding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy has shown significant improvement in node-positive breast cancer patients but the optimal dose schedule has still remained undetermined. Objectives. The feasibility of dose-dense epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients was investigated. Methods. All patients were treated with epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every two weeks for four cycles with daily Pegfilgrastim (G-CSF) that was administered 3–10 days after each cycle of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide infusion which followed by (80 mg/m2) paclitaxel for twelve consecutive weeks. Results. Sixty consecutive patients were analyzed, of whom 57 patients (95%) completed the regimen and no case of toxicity-related death was observed. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was uncommon and the most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse event was neuropathy disorders. Conclusions. Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen in node-positive breast cancer patients without serious complications.
    09/2014; 2014:259312. DOI:10.1155/2014/259312
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene expression arrays have shown that breast cancer is comprised of at least four different molecular diseases. These are 1) basal-like breast cancer, 2) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2)-positive/estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer; 3) luminal A breast cancer; and 4) luminal breast B cancer. Basal-like cancer is characterized by ER-negative, progesterone receptor–negative, and Her2-negative expressions. Luminal breast cancer is characterized by ER-positive expression, with the luminal B subtype exhibiting a higher expression of proliferation genes. Several studies have shown that luminal A breast cancer exhibits a better outcome compared with other classes. Also, recent studies have shown that the same subclass is less chemosensitive. These data suggest that some selected luminal A breast cancer cases could be spared adjuvant chemotherapy given their better outcome and lesser chemosensitivity compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Although other subtypes are more chemosensitive, there is debate about whether some drugs could be active in specific subtypes. Anthracyclines have been reported to be more effective in Her2-overexpressing breast cancer, and cisplatin is currently under investigation in basal-like breast cancer. Finally, some data suggest that luminal B breast cancer exhibits higher sensitivity to aromatase inhibitors. Overall, molecular classes exhibit different sensitivity to conventional drugs. To what extent these data obtained in retrospective biomarker studies could be implemented in daily practice is a matter of debate given the heterogeneity of findings in different studies. KeywordsBreast cancer-Molecular classification-Endocrine therapy-Chemotherapy-ERBB2-positive
    Current Breast Cancer Reports 09/2010; 2(3):152-158. DOI:10.1007/s12609-010-0016-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer is more likely to affect younger premenopausal women and despite being responsive to traditional chemotherapy, continues to carry a poor overall prognosis. Traditional protective factors for breast cancer such as multiparity and early primaparity actually increase the risk for the triple-negative variant. Unlike other breast cancers, the incidence of this disease is also much higher in African American and West African women. Among those with triple-negative disease in the United States, the mortality rates are also highest in African American women. Variations in risk factors and socioeconomic status, lack of treatment, delays in treatment, and inadequate dosing of chemotherapy are just a few of the many reasons that may explain why this incidence and survival disparity persists.
    The Cancer Journal 01/2010; 16(1):17-22. DOI:10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181d3eef5 · 3.61 Impact Factor
Show more